Virtual Clinic Telehealth Abortion Services in the United StatesOne Year After Dobbs:Landscape Review

被引:1
|
作者
Koenig, Leah R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ko, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Upadhyay, Ushma D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth, 330 Broadway,Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[2] Univ Calif Oakland, Global Hlth Inst, Ctr Gender & Hlth Justice, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
medication abortion; telehealth; virtual clinics; abortion; access; policy; health equity;
D O I
10.2196/50749
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Telehealth abortion has taken on a vital role in maintaining abortion access since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision. However, little remains known about the landscape of new telehealth-only virtual clinic abortion providers that have expanded since telehealth abortion first became widely available in the United States in 2021. Objective: This study aimed to (1) document the landscape of telehealth-only virtual clinic abortion care in the United States,(2) describe changes in the presence of virtual clinic abortion services between September 2022, following the Dobbs decision, and June 2023, and (3) identify structural factors that may perpetuate inequities in access to virtual clinic abortion care. Methods: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study by reviewing web search results and abortion directories to identify virtual abortion clinics in September 2022 and June 2023 and described changes in the presence of virtual clinics between these2 periods. In June 2023, we also described each virtual clinic's policies, including states served, costs, patient age limits, insurance acceptance, financial assistance available, and gestational limits. Results: We documented 11 virtual clinics providing telehealth abortion care in 26 states and Washington DC in September2022. By June 2023, 20 virtual clinics were providing services in 27 states and Washington DC. Most (n=16) offered care to minors, 8 provided care until 10 weeks of pregnancy, and median costs were US $259. In addition, 2 accepted private insurance and 1 accepted Medicaid, within a limited number of states. Most (n=16) had some form of financial assistance available. Conclusions: Virtual clinic abortion providers have proliferated since the Dobbs decision. We documented inequities in the availability of telehealth abortion care from virtual clinics, including age restrictions that exclude minors, gestational limits for care, and limited insurance and Medicaid acceptance. Notably, virtual clinic abortion care was not permitted in 11 states wherein-person abortion is available.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] One Year After Dobbs-Vast Changes to the Abortion Legal Landscape
    Gostin, Lawrence O.
    Wetter, Sarah
    Reingold, Rebecca B.
    JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2023, 4 (08): : E233091
  • [2] Telehealth vs In-Clinic Medication Abortion Services
    Fiastro, Anna E.
    Zheng, Zihan
    Ruben, Molly R.
    Gipson, Jessica
    Godfrey, Emily M.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (09) : E2331900
  • [3] LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON ABORTION IN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE AFTER THE DOBBS CASE
    Garcia-Anton Palacios, Elena
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2023, (63):
  • [4] Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs
    Riley, Taylor
    Fiastro, Anna E.
    Benson, Lyndsey S.
    Khattar, Anuj
    Prager, Sarah
    Godfrey, Emily M.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (05) : E2413847
  • [5] EVALUATING AFFORDABILITY OF TELEHEALTH MEDICATION ABORTION SERVICES IN CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES
    Ebadani, L.
    Fiastro, A.
    Godfrey, E.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 72 (01) : 461 - 461
  • [6] DOBBS V. JACKSON, A YEAR LATER. ABORTION AND RELIGION IN THE UNITED STATES
    Palomino Lozano, Rafael
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2023, (63):
  • [7] The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review
    Brown, Camille
    Neerland, Carrie E.
    Weinfurter, Elizabeth V.
    Saftner, Melissa A.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 68 (06) : 744 - 758
  • [8] Patient Acceptability of Asynchronous vs Synchronous Telehealth Abortion Care: A Cohort Study of Telehealth Abortion Care Provided by Virtual Clinics in the United States
    Koenig, L. R.
    Ko, J.
    Valladares, E.
    Coeytaux, F.
    Wells, E.
    Lyles, C.
    Upadhyay, U. D.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2023, 121
  • [9] Telehealth vs In-Clinic Medication Abortion Services (vol 6, e2331900, 2023)
    Fiastro, A. E.
    Zheng, Z.
    Ruben, M. R.
    Gipson, J.
    Godfrey, E. M.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (09)
  • [10] Use of Abortion Services in Massachusetts After the Dobbs Decision Among In-State vs Out-of-State Residents
    Keefe-Oates, Brianna
    Fulcher, Isabel
    Fortin, Jennifer
    Goldberg, Alisa B.
    Chen, Jarvis T.
    Gottlieb, Barbara
    Janiak, Elizabeth
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (09) : E2332400