Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs

被引:0
|
作者
Riley, Taylor [1 ,2 ]
Fiastro, Anna E. [3 ]
Benson, Lyndsey S. [4 ]
Khattar, Anuj [5 ]
Prager, Sarah [4 ]
Godfrey, Emily M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Hans Rosling Ctr Populat Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Cedar River Clin, Renton, WA USA
关键词
INTERRUPTED TIME-SERIES; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13847
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance The Supreme Court decision Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) overturned federal protections to abortion care and altered the reproductive health care landscape. Thus far, aggregated state-level data reveal increases in the number of abortions in states where abortion is still legal, but there is limited information on delays to care and changes in the characteristics of people accessing abortion in these states after Dobbs. Objective To examine changes in abortion provision and delays to care after Dobbs. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective cohort study of all abortions performed at an independent, high-volume reproductive health care clinic network in Washington state from January 1, 2017, to July 31, 2023. Using an interrupted time series, the study assessed changes in abortion care after Dobbs. ExposureAbortion care obtained after (June 24, 2022, to July 31, 2023) vs before (January 1, 2017, to June 23, 2022) Dobbs. Main Outcome and Measure Primary outcomes included weekly number of abortions and out-of-state patients and weekly average of gestational duration (days) and time to appointment (days). Results Among the 18 379 abortions during the study period, most were procedural (13 192 abortions [72%]) and funded by public insurance (11 412 abortions [62%]). The mean (SD) age of individuals receiving abortion care was 28.5 (6.44) years. Following Dobbs, the number of procedural abortions per week increased by 6.35 (95% CI, 2.83-9.86), but then trended back toward pre-Dobbs levels. The number of out-of-state patients per week increased by 2 (95% CI, 1.1-3.6) and trends remained stable. The average gestational duration per week increased by 6.9 (95% CI, 3.6-10.2) days following Dobbs, primarily due to increased gestations of procedural abortions. The average gestational duration among out-of-state patients did not change following Dobbs, but it did increase by 6 days for in-state patients (5.9; 95% CI, 3.2-8.6 days). There were no significant changes in time to appointment. Conclusions and Relevance These findings provide a detailed picture of changes in abortion provision and delays to care after Dobbs in a state bordering a total ban state. In this study, more people traveled from out of state to receive care and in-state patients sought care a week later in gestation. These findings can inform interventions and policies to improve access for all seeking abortion care.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Abortion after Dobbs: Defendants, denials, and delays
    Kimport, Katrina
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (36)
  • [2] Tubal Sterilization Rates by State Abortion Laws After the Dobbs Decision
    Xu, Xiao
    Chen, Ling
    Desai, Vrunda B.
    Gross, Cary P.
    Pollack, Craig Evan
    Schwartz, Peter E.
    Wright, Jason D.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024,
  • [3] State Abortion Policy and Provider Moral Distress Levels After Dobbs
    Rivlin, Katherine
    Bornstein, Marta
    Tomu, Taylor
    Norris, Alison H.
    Howard, Dana
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 143 (5S): : 78S - 78S
  • [4] State Abortion Policy and Moral Distress Among Clinicians Providing Abortion After the Dobbs Decision
    Rivlin, Katherine
    Bornstein, Marta
    Wascher, Jocelyn
    Turner, Abigail Norris
    Norris, Alison H.
    Howard, Dana
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (08)
  • [5] Virtual Clinic Telehealth Abortion Services in the United StatesOne Year After Dobbs:Landscape Review
    Koenig, Leah R.
    Ko, Jennifer
    Upadhyay, Ushma D.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [6] Abortion Care After the Dobbs Decision: An Academic Health System's Response to a Statewide Ban
    Larin, Katherine Q.
    Rouse, Caroline E.
    Bernard, Caitlin
    Castor, Tory Callaghan
    Kremer, Brian
    Ingram, David A.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2024, 99 (04) : 388 - 394
  • [8] Use of Abortion Services in Massachusetts After the Dobbs Decision Among In-State vs Out-of-State Residents
    Keefe-Oates, Brianna
    Fulcher, Isabel
    Fortin, Jennifer
    Goldberg, Alisa B.
    Chen, Jarvis T.
    Gottlieb, Barbara
    Janiak, Elizabeth
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (09) : E2332400
  • [9] Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision
    Aiken, Abigail R. A.
    Wells, Elisa S.
    Gomperts, Rebecca
    Scott, James G.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (18): : 1558 - 1564
  • [10] Ambiguities in Washington State hospital policies, irrespective of Catholic affiliation, regarding abortion and contraception service provision
    Schwandt, Hilary M.
    Sparkle, Bethany
    Post-Kinney, Moriah
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2018, 15