Screening log: Challenges in community patient recruitment for gynecologic oncology clinical trials

被引:0
|
作者
Ratnaparkhi, Rubina [1 ]
Doolittle, Gary C. [2 ,3 ]
Krebill, Hope [2 ,3 ]
Springer, Michelle [2 ,3 ]
Calhoun, Elizabeth [4 ]
Jewell, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Mudaranthakam, Dinesh Pal [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Canc Ctr, 4001 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[3] Masonic Canc Alliance, 4350 Shawnee Mission Pkwy, Fairway, KS 66205 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Off Vice Chancellor Hlth Affairs, 914 S Wood St, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Clinical trials; Gynecologic oncology; Patient recruitment; Electronic screening; ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA; RACIAL DISPARITIES; RURAL PATIENTS; CANCER CARE; PARTICIPATION; ENROLLMENT; BARRIERS; METAANALYSIS; OUTREACH; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101379
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Clinical trial participation can improve overall survival and mitigate healthcare disparities for gynecologic cancer patients in low-volume community centers. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a centrally regulated but administratively decentralized electronic screening log system to identify eligible patients across a large catchment area for a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer center's open clinical trials. Methods: Electronic screening log data collected between 2014 and 2021 from ten community partner sites in a single NCI-designated cancer center's catchment area were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical factors assessed included cancer site, primary versus recurrent disease status, and histology. Identification efficiency (the ratio of patients screened identified with an available trial) was calculated. Identification inefficiencies (failures to identify patients with a potentially relevant trial) were assessed, and etiologies were characterized. Results: Across ten community partner sites, 492 gynecologic cancer patients were screened for seven open clinical trials during the study period. This included 170 (34.5 %) ovarian cancer patients, 156 (31.7 %) endometrial cancer patients, and 119 (24.2 %) cervical cancer patients. Over 40 % had advanced stage disease, and 10.6 % had recurrent disease. Only three patients were identified as having a relevant open trial; none ultimately enrolled due to not meeting trial eligibility criteria. An additional 2-52 patients were retrospectively found to have a relevant trial available despite not being identified as such within the electronic screening log system. Up to 14.4 % of patients had one or more missing minimum data elements that hindered full evaluation of clinical trial availability. Re-screening patients when new trials open may identify 12-15 additional patients per recurrent disease trial. Conclusions: An electronic screening log system can increase awareness of gynecologic oncology clinical trials at a NCI-designated cancer center's community partner sites. However, it is inadequate as a single intervention to increase clinical trial enrollment. Providing adequate support staff, documenting clinical factors consistently, rescreening patients at relevant intervals, and coordinating with central study personnel may increase its utility.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Participation of Patients With Limited English Proficiency in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trials
    Jorge, Soledad
    Masshoor, Shatreen
    Gray, Heidi J.
    Swisher, Elizabeth M.
    Doll, Kemi M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2023, 21 (01): : 27 - +
  • [42] Clinical Trials in Gynecologic Oncology: Past, Present, and Future EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Annunziata, Christina M.
    Kohn, Elise C.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2018, 73 (05) : 278 - 279
  • [43] Increasing patient participation in oncology clinical trials
    Chen, Jie
    Lu, Ying
    Kummar, Shivaani
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (03): : 2219 - 2226
  • [44] A prospective study of patient accrual to clinical trials at a NCI-funded Community Clinical Oncology Program
    Soori, G. S.
    Wilwerding, M. B.
    Carlson, M.
    Verdirame, J.
    Townley, P.
    Hutchins, M.
    Silberstein, P.
    McKenna, P.
    Mahacek, L.
    Madcharo, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)
  • [45] A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF BARRIERS TO PATIENT RECRUITMENT IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY TRIALS
    Frary, A.
    Price, S.
    Jefferies, S.
    Harris, F.
    Burnet, N.
    Jena, R.
    Watts, C.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 : 3 - 3
  • [46] Challenges in launching multinational oncology clinical trials in India
    Saini, Kamal S.
    Agarwal, Gaurav
    Jagannathan, Ramesh
    Metzger-Filho, Otto
    Saini, Monika L.
    Mistry, Khurshid
    Ali, Raghib
    Gupta, Sudeep
    [J]. SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 2 (01) : 44 - 49
  • [47] Erratum to: Overcoming organizational challenges of integrating patient-reported outcomes in oncology clinical trials
    A. Gnanasakthy
    C. DeMuro
    [J]. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2016, 50 : 517 - 517
  • [48] BARRIERS TO CONDUCTING CLINICAL TRIALS AND ONCOLOGY RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY IN THE US
    Nabhan, C.
    Feinberg, B. A.
    Fillman, J.
    Ernst, F. R.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A134 - A134
  • [49] Defining the denominator: A meaningful clinical trial screening process in gynecologic oncology
    King, Fraya
    Jernigan, Amelia
    Nair, Navya
    Castellano, Tara
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 176 : S276 - S276
  • [50] PATIENT RECRUITMENT AND COMPLIANCE ISSUES IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    CRAMER, JA
    [J]. EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 1993, : 211 - 222