Development and validation of the NCC-BC-A scale to assess patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer patients in China

被引:0
|
作者
Ma, Fei [1 ]
Yan, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Guan, Xiuwen [1 ]
Liu, Tianmou [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Clin Res Inst, Inst Adv Clin Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER INNOVATION | 2024年 / 3卷 / 06期
关键词
breast cancer; patient-reported outcome; quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EORTC QLQ-C30; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/cai2.141
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe commonly used international patient-reported outcome scales for breast cancer were developed before the advent of multiple targeted therapies and immunotherapies, rendering them potentially insufficient for current clinical practices. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a specific patient-reported outcome scale tailored for breast cancer patients in China to optimize the management model for these patients.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, and CNKI databases to extract dimensions and items for a potential patient-reported outcome scale. The Delphi method was used to modify, add, subtract, and adjust the language of items until the experts reached a consensus on the first draft. This draft was further refined using a cognitive test and a presurvey. The optimized scale was used for a formal survey, and the items were further analyzed and screened using metrics such as the coefficient of variation, correlation coefficient, internal item consistency, factor analysis, reliability, and validity.ResultsA total of 10,954 articles were analyzed, and 237 were used to create a pool of 277 patient-reported outcome items. Through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, the experts' authority coefficients were 0.739 and 0.826. After a cognitive test, several items were adjusted to enhance understanding. Further adjustments were made following a presurvey of 200 advanced breast cancer patients, resulting in a 38-item patient-reported outcomes scale, termed NCC-BC-A. In the national formal survey, 588 advanced breast cancer patients participated. Principal component analysis showed good consistency among the items and sufficient difference between the dimensions. The results were normally distributed with good variation. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.925 and the test-retest reliability was 0.9041.ConclusionThe NCC-BC-A scale has high validity and reliability. It comprehensively considered the characteristics of systemic treatment for breast cancer, and the specific context within China. Its implementation may help clinicians to pay more attention to quality of life of breast cancer patients and to optimize the system for managing this condition. This study developed a NCC-BC-A scale with relatively high validity and reliability for breast cancer (BC) patients. NCC-BC-A scale fully considered the characteristics of systemic treatment status for BC and the realistic situation in China, which may help clinicians to pay more attention to QOL of BC patients and to optimize management system for BC. image
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality of Life and Patient-reported Outcomes in the Older Breast Cancer Patient
    Ballinger, R. S.
    Fallowfield, L. J.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 21 (02) : 140 - 155
  • [32] Coffee and tea consumption (CTC), patient-reported (PRO), and clinical outcomes in a longitudinal study of patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC)
    Soldato, D.
    Havas, J.
    Presti, D.
    Lapidari, P.
    Rassy, N.
    Pistilli, B.
    Martin, E.
    Del Mastro, L.
    Martin, A-L.
    Jacquet, A.
    Coutant, C.
    Cottu, P. H.
    Merimeche, A.
    Lerebours, F.
    Tredan, O.
    Vanlemmens, L.
    Andre, F.
    Vaz-Luis, I.
    Di Meglio, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S1184 - S1184
  • [33] Patient-reported outcomes for immediate breast reconstruction with mastectomy among breast cancer patients in Pakistan
    Afzal, Sidra
    Parvaiz, Muhammad Asad
    Javed, Nida
    Abu Bakar, Muhammad
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 74 (07) : 1235 - 1239
  • [34] Patient-reported Outcomes Associated with Surgical Intervention for Breast Cancer
    Bacelar, Karina Okajima
    Cordeiro, Natalia
    Nazario, Afonso
    Bromberg, Silvio
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S649 - S649
  • [35] The Future of Quality Improvement in Breast Cancer: Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Sharma, Ranjna
    Shulman, Lawrence N.
    James, Ted
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2017, 32 (05) : 469 - 471
  • [36] The Value of Patient-reported Outcomes in the Management of Women with Breast Cancer
    Nikitina, T.
    Kurbatova, K.
    Ionova, T.
    Novik, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S155 - S156
  • [37] Patient-reported outcomes in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Shinn, Eileen H.
    Gregrowski, Sophie
    Kimmick, Gretchen
    Dominici, Laura S.
    Frank, Elizabeth S.
    Smith, Karen Lisa
    Rocque, Gabrielle
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    Pollastro, Teri
    Melisko, Michelle
    Ballinger, Tarah J.
    Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M.
    Wolff, Antonio C.
    CANCER, 2020, 126 (05) : 922 - 930
  • [38] Prioritization of Patient-Reported Outcomes by Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Mougalian, Sarah S.
    Aminawung, Jenerius A.
    Presley, Carolyn J.
    Canavan, Maureen E.
    Holland, Margaret L.
    Hu, Xin
    Gross, Cary P.
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2019, 3
  • [39] Patient-reported distress screening outcomes in breast cancer.
    Smart, Bridget
    Vallow, Laura
    Hollant, Laeticia
    Single, Megan
    Gaines, Katherine
    Habboush, Jacob
    Biers, Heather
    Day, Atiya
    Tzou, Katherine S.
    Miller, Robert Clell
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (28)
  • [40] Patient-reported outcomes in the rehabilitation of patients with colorectal cancer
    Schmiesing, T.
    Neuner, B.
    Schilling, G.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 46 : 141 - 142