Development and validation of the NCC-BC-A scale to assess patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer patients in China

被引:0
|
作者
Ma, Fei [1 ]
Yan, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Guan, Xiuwen [1 ]
Liu, Tianmou [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Clin Res Inst, Inst Adv Clin Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER INNOVATION | 2024年 / 3卷 / 06期
关键词
breast cancer; patient-reported outcome; quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EORTC QLQ-C30; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/cai2.141
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe commonly used international patient-reported outcome scales for breast cancer were developed before the advent of multiple targeted therapies and immunotherapies, rendering them potentially insufficient for current clinical practices. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a specific patient-reported outcome scale tailored for breast cancer patients in China to optimize the management model for these patients.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, and CNKI databases to extract dimensions and items for a potential patient-reported outcome scale. The Delphi method was used to modify, add, subtract, and adjust the language of items until the experts reached a consensus on the first draft. This draft was further refined using a cognitive test and a presurvey. The optimized scale was used for a formal survey, and the items were further analyzed and screened using metrics such as the coefficient of variation, correlation coefficient, internal item consistency, factor analysis, reliability, and validity.ResultsA total of 10,954 articles were analyzed, and 237 were used to create a pool of 277 patient-reported outcome items. Through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, the experts' authority coefficients were 0.739 and 0.826. After a cognitive test, several items were adjusted to enhance understanding. Further adjustments were made following a presurvey of 200 advanced breast cancer patients, resulting in a 38-item patient-reported outcomes scale, termed NCC-BC-A. In the national formal survey, 588 advanced breast cancer patients participated. Principal component analysis showed good consistency among the items and sufficient difference between the dimensions. The results were normally distributed with good variation. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.925 and the test-retest reliability was 0.9041.ConclusionThe NCC-BC-A scale has high validity and reliability. It comprehensively considered the characteristics of systemic treatment for breast cancer, and the specific context within China. Its implementation may help clinicians to pay more attention to quality of life of breast cancer patients and to optimize the system for managing this condition. This study developed a NCC-BC-A scale with relatively high validity and reliability for breast cancer (BC) patients. NCC-BC-A scale fully considered the characteristics of systemic treatment status for BC and the realistic situation in China, which may help clinicians to pay more attention to QOL of BC patients and to optimize management system for BC. image
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and validation of a NCC-BC-A scale to assess patient-reported outcomes for advanced breast cancer patients in China
    Guan, Xiuwen
    Ma, Fei
    Yan, Xiaoyan
    Liu, Tianmou
    Shen, Ning
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [2] BC-PROM: validation of a patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with breast cancer
    Hu, Xiaojuan
    Zhang, Chunsen
    Zhang, Yanbo
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (17)
  • [3] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A PATIENT-REPORTED QUESTIONNAIRE TO ASSESS THE QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES OF INDIAN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
    Deshpande, P.
    Chittkathopottamal, A. N.
    Bommareddy, L. S.
    Mallasamy, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A236 - A236
  • [4] Development and validation of patient-reported outcomes scale for hypertension
    Li Zhi
    Liu Qiaojun
    Zhang Yanbo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 27 (05) : 369 - 376
  • [5] The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery
    Dawson, J.
    Doll, H.
    Boller, I.
    Fitzpatrick, R.
    Little, C.
    Rees, J.
    Jenkinson, C.
    Carr, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (04): : 466 - 473
  • [6] Development and Validation of a Prognostic Survival Model With Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With Cancer
    Seow, Hsien
    Tanuseputro, Peter
    Barbera, Lisa
    Earle, Craig
    Guthrie, Dawn
    Isenberg, Sarina
    Juergens, Rosalyn
    Myers, Jeffrey
    Brouwers, Melissa
    Sutradhar, Rinku
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (04)
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Cancer
    Tevis, Sarah E.
    James, Ted A.
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Yao, Katharine A.
    Merlino, James
    Dietz, Jill
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) : 2839 - 2845
  • [8] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Cancer
    Sarah E. Tevis
    Ted A. James
    Henry M. Kuerer
    Andrea L. Pusic
    Katharine A. Yao
    James Merlino
    Jill Dietz
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 2839 - 2845
  • [9] Patient-reported outcomes to assess symptoms in patients with metastatic breast cancer: Pilot implementation project
    Sinkar, Shruti
    Too, Faith
    Carr, Kelly
    Jelinek, Jessica
    Saylor, Elizabeth
    Bacon, Jacqueline
    Fetting, John H.
    Wilkinson, Mary
    Nunes, Raquel
    Sheng, Jennifer Y.
    Stearns, Vered
    Smith, Karen L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (28)
  • [10] Validation study of the Emoji scale in evaluating patient reported outcomes for breast cancer patients
    Suzuki, Yoko
    Taira, Naruto
    Kajiwara, Yukiko
    Kochi, Mariko
    Iwamoto, Takayuki
    Ikeda, Hirokuni
    Shien, Tadahiko
    Doihara, Hiroyoshi
    Kikawa, Yuichiro
    Uemura, Yukari
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)