Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for discrimination of hypertensive heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Qingyuan [1 ]
Chen, Zhiyu [1 ]
Qi, Chengcheng [1 ]
Xu, Sunan [1 ]
Ren, Ruichen [1 ]
Li, Wenting [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxue [1 ]
Zhang, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Radiol, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
hypertensive heart disease; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; T1; mapping; ECV; strain; LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY; EXTRACELLULAR VOLUME; EJECTION FRACTION; NATIVE T1; 3-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL STRAIN; DIFFERENTIATION; CONTRACTION; FAILURE; BIAS;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2024.1421013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Differentiating hypertensive heart disease (HHD) from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is crucial yet challenging due to overlapping clinical and morphological features. Recent studies have explored the use of various cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters to distinguish between these conditions, but findings have remained inconclusive. This study aims to identify which CMR parameters effectively discriminate between HHD and HCM and to investigate their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms through a meta-analysis. Methods: The researchers conducted a systematic and comprehensive search for all studies that used CMR to discriminate between HHD and HCM and calculated the Hedges'g effect size for each of the included studies, which were then pooled using a random-effects model and tested for the effects of potential influencing variables through subgroup and regression analyses. Results: In this review, 26 studies encompassing 1,349 HHD and 1,581 HCM cases were included for meta-analysis. Analysis revealed that HHD showed a significant lower in T1 mapping (g = -0.469, P < 0.001), extracellular volume (g = -0.417, P = 0.024), left ventricular mass index (g = -0.437, P < 0.001), and maximal left ventricular wall thickness (g = -2.076, P < 0.001), alongside a significant higher in end-systolic volume index (g = 0.993, P < 0.001) and end-diastolic volume index (g = 0.553, P < 0.001), compared to HCM. Conclusion: This study clearly demonstrates that CMR parameters can effectively differentiate between HHD and HCM. HHD is characterized by significantly lower diffuse interstitial fibrosis and myocardial hypertrophy, along with better-preserved diastolic function but lower systolic function, compared to HCM. The findings highlight the need for standardized CMR protocols, considering the significant influence of MRI machine vendors, post-processing software, and study regions on diagnostic parameters. These insights are crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy and optimizing treatment strategies for patients with HHD and HCM.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in unusual form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Sustar, Aleksandra
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (02) : 199 - 200
  • [32] UTILITY OF CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY
    Mangalindan, Kristin
    Hulten, Edward
    Woods, Kevin
    Lichtenberger, John
    Peterson, Paul G.
    Hood, Maureen
    Ho, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 : S631 - S631
  • [33] Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Rickers, C
    Wilke, NM
    Jerosch-Herold, M
    Casey, SA
    Panse, P
    Panse, N
    Weil, J
    Zenovich, AG
    Maron, BJ
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (06) : 855 - 861
  • [34] Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy - Diagnosed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Ates, Mehmet
    Kwong, Raymond Y.
    Lipton, Martin J.
    Tatli, Servet
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2006, 33 (03) : 408 - 409
  • [35] CARDIAC MYOSIN INHIBITORS IN OBSTRUCTIVE HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Guida, Camila Mota
    Carvalho Ferreira, Andre Luiz
    Neves, Henrique Alexsander
    Benitez Gonzalez, Maria E.
    Lima, Ana Emanuela
    Neves, Lucca Laperriere De M.
    Junqueira De Castro, Ana Beatriz
    Vilalva, Kelvin Henrique
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 640 - 640
  • [36] The human amygdala: a systematic review and meta-analysis of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging
    Brierley, B
    Shaw, P
    David, AS
    BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2002, 39 (01) : 84 - 105
  • [37] Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Dong Hwan
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Shim, Ju Hyun
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Choi, Joon-Il
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (09)
  • [38] Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Morris, Zoe
    Whiteley, William N.
    Longstreth, W. T., Jr.
    Weber, Frank
    Lee, Yi-Chung
    Tsushima, Yoshito
    Alphs, Hannah
    Ladd, Susanne C.
    Warlow, Charles
    Wardlaw, Joanna M.
    Salman, Rustam Al-Shahi
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 547 - 550
  • [39] Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in epilepsy surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Englman, Cameron
    Malpas, Charles B.
    Harvey, A. Simon
    Maixner, Wirginia J.
    Yang, Joseph Yuan-Mou
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 91 : 1 - 8
  • [40] MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING -RADIOMICS IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Cuccu, Ilaria
    Di Donato, Violante
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    D'Auge, Tullio Golia
    Perniola, Giorgia
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Tomao, Federica
    Giannini, Andrea
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Bogani, Giorgio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A156 - A156