Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for discrimination of hypertensive heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Qingyuan [1 ]
Chen, Zhiyu [1 ]
Qi, Chengcheng [1 ]
Xu, Sunan [1 ]
Ren, Ruichen [1 ]
Li, Wenting [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxue [1 ]
Zhang, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Radiol, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
hypertensive heart disease; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; T1; mapping; ECV; strain; LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY; EXTRACELLULAR VOLUME; EJECTION FRACTION; NATIVE T1; 3-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL STRAIN; DIFFERENTIATION; CONTRACTION; FAILURE; BIAS;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2024.1421013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Differentiating hypertensive heart disease (HHD) from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is crucial yet challenging due to overlapping clinical and morphological features. Recent studies have explored the use of various cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters to distinguish between these conditions, but findings have remained inconclusive. This study aims to identify which CMR parameters effectively discriminate between HHD and HCM and to investigate their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms through a meta-analysis. Methods: The researchers conducted a systematic and comprehensive search for all studies that used CMR to discriminate between HHD and HCM and calculated the Hedges'g effect size for each of the included studies, which were then pooled using a random-effects model and tested for the effects of potential influencing variables through subgroup and regression analyses. Results: In this review, 26 studies encompassing 1,349 HHD and 1,581 HCM cases were included for meta-analysis. Analysis revealed that HHD showed a significant lower in T1 mapping (g = -0.469, P < 0.001), extracellular volume (g = -0.417, P = 0.024), left ventricular mass index (g = -0.437, P < 0.001), and maximal left ventricular wall thickness (g = -2.076, P < 0.001), alongside a significant higher in end-systolic volume index (g = 0.993, P < 0.001) and end-diastolic volume index (g = 0.553, P < 0.001), compared to HCM. Conclusion: This study clearly demonstrates that CMR parameters can effectively differentiate between HHD and HCM. HHD is characterized by significantly lower diffuse interstitial fibrosis and myocardial hypertrophy, along with better-preserved diastolic function but lower systolic function, compared to HCM. The findings highlight the need for standardized CMR protocols, considering the significant influence of MRI machine vendors, post-processing software, and study regions on diagnostic parameters. These insights are crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy and optimizing treatment strategies for patients with HHD and HCM.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk stratification using late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kamp, Nicholas J.
    Chery, Godefroy
    Kosinski, Andrzej S.
    Desai, Milind Y.
    Wazni, Oussama
    Schmidler, Gillian Sanders
    Patel, Manesh
    Lopes, Renato D.
    Morin, Daniel P.
    Al-Khatib, Sana M.
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 66 : 10 - 16
  • [2] Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking strain analysis for discrimination between hypertensive heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Neisius, Ulf
    Myerson, Lana
    Fahmy, Ahmed S.
    Nakamori, Shiro
    El-Rewaidy, Hossam
    Joshi, Gargi
    Duan, Chong
    Manning, Warren J.
    Nezafat, Reza
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (08):
  • [3] Myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Mallikethi-Reddy, Sagar
    Palla, Mohan
    Alesh, Issa
    Afonso, Luis
    HEART, 2015, 101 (17) : 1406 - 1411
  • [4] Meta-Analysis of Penetrance and Systematic Review on Transition to Disease in Genetic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
    Topriceanu, Constantin-Cristian
    Pereira, Alexandre C.
    Moon, James C.
    Captur, Gabriella
    Ho, Carolyn Y.
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 149 (02) : 107 - 123
  • [5] Claustrophobia in magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Munn, Zachary
    Moola, Sandeep
    Lisy, Karolina
    Riitano, Dagmara
    Murphy, Fred
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2015, 21 (02) : E59 - E63
  • [6] Tissue mapping by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the prognostication of cardiac amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cai, Sean
    Haghbayan, Hourmazd
    Chan, Kelvin K. W.
    Deva, Djeven P.
    Jimenez-Juan, Laura
    Connelly, Kim A.
    Ng, Ming-Yen
    Yan, Raymond T.
    Yan, Andrew T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 403
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmad, Rani
    Ajlan, Amr M.
    Eskander, Ayman A.
    Alhazmi, Turki A.
    Khashoggi, Khalid
    Wazzan, Mohammad A.
    Abduljabbar, Ahmed H.
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [8] Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rani Ahmad
    Amr M. Ajlan
    Ayman A. Eskander
    Turki A. Alhazmi
    Khalid Khashoggi
    Mohammad A. Wazzan
    Ahmed H. Abduljabbar
    Insights into Imaging, 12
  • [9] Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis
    Zhen Weng
    Raymond H Chan
    Jialu Yao
    Yafeng Zhou
    Yang He
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 18 (Suppl 1)
  • [10] Strain imaging with cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Lario, C.
    Arese, C.
    Mabritto, B.
    Bianco, M.
    Seitun, S.
    Macera, A.
    Petracchini, M.
    Balbo-Mussetto, A.
    Fornari, A.
    Milan, A.
    Negro, G.
    De Benedictis, M.
    Conte, M. R.
    Cirillo, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 20 : 354 - 354