Evaluating energy balance and environmental footprint of sludge management in BRICS countries

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Zhenyao [1 ]
Li, Xuan [1 ]
Liu, Huan [1 ]
Mou, Jinhua [2 ]
Khan, Stuart J. [3 ]
Lin, Carol Sze Ki [2 ]
Wang, Qilin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ctr Technol Water & Wastewater, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Kowloon, Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Civil Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
WATER RESEARCH X | 2024年 / 25卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Sludge management; BRICS countries; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; Energy balance; Carbon neutrality; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; RECOVERY; WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100255
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change is driving global endeavours to achieve carbon neutrality and renewable energy expansion. Sludge, a nutrient-rich waste, holds energy potential yet poses environmental challenges that need proper management. We conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment to evaluate the energy balance and environmental footprint of the most commonly used sludge management scenarios in BRICS countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Technologies such as incineration and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery units (i.e., cogeneration unit) maximize energy balance and minimize the environmental footprint, with incineration showing a superior performance. Shifting sludge management scenarios from the worst to the best can boost energy production by 1.4-98.4 times and cut the environmental footprint by 1.5-21.4 times. In 2050, these improvements could lead to a 98-fold boost in energy generation and a 25-fold drop in carbon emissions, according to the Announced Pledges Scenarios. Optimizing parameters such as volatile solids and anaerobic digestion efficiency further boosts energy output and minimizes the environmental footprint. This study offers robust evidence to support sustainable sludge management and thus promote energy recovery and carbon neutrality goals, guide technological transitions, and inform policymaking for sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How to Predict Energy Consumption in BRICS Countries?
    Khan, Atif Maqbool
    Osinska, Magdalena
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (10)
  • [22] Evaluating the influence of technology, energy consumption, and financial progress on material footprint in GCC countries
    Ulussever, Talat
    Pata, Ugur Korkut
    Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2024, 23
  • [23] Mitigating ecological footprint in BRICS countries: unveiling the role of disaggregated clean energy, green technology innovation and political stability
    Behera, Biswanath
    Behera, Puspanjali
    Sucharita, Sanhita
    Sethi, Narayan
    DISCOVER SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [24] The impact of private equity investment and renewable energy on environmental degradation: evidence from BRICS countries
    Malik, Kunjana
    Sharma, Sakshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2024, 18 (04) : 685 - 706
  • [25] Green finance, renewable energy investment, and environmental protection: empirical evidence from BRICS countries
    Zeng Hailiang
    Iqbal, Wasim
    Chau, Ka Yin
    Shah, Syed Ale Raza
    Ahmad, Wasim
    Hua, Huang
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022,
  • [26] Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries
    Danish
    Wang, Zhaohua
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 670 : 1075 - 1083
  • [27] Impact of energy and industrial structure on environmental quality and urbanization: evidence from a panel of BRICS countries
    Jikun Jiang
    Shenglai Zhu
    Shuning Gao
    Bilal Aslam
    Weihao Wang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 114183 - 114200
  • [28] Impact of energy and industrial structure on environmental quality and urbanization: evidence from a panel of BRICS countries
    Jiang, Jikun
    Zhu, Shenglai
    Gao, Shuning
    Aslam, Bilal
    Wang, Weihao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (53) : 114183 - 114200
  • [29] Fossil Energy Demand and Economic Development in BRICS Countries
    Wang, Hong
    Amjad, Muhammad Asif
    Arshed, Noman
    Mohamed, Abdullah
    Ali, Shamsher
    Jafri, Muhammad Afaq Haider
    Khan, Yousaf Ali
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [30] Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS.
    Nathaniel, Solomon Prince
    Yalciner, Kursat
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 70