Evaluating energy balance and environmental footprint of sludge management in BRICS countries

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Zhenyao [1 ]
Li, Xuan [1 ]
Liu, Huan [1 ]
Mou, Jinhua [2 ]
Khan, Stuart J. [3 ]
Lin, Carol Sze Ki [2 ]
Wang, Qilin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ctr Technol Water & Wastewater, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Kowloon, Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Civil Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
WATER RESEARCH X | 2024年 / 25卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Sludge management; BRICS countries; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; Energy balance; Carbon neutrality; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; RECOVERY; WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100255
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change is driving global endeavours to achieve carbon neutrality and renewable energy expansion. Sludge, a nutrient-rich waste, holds energy potential yet poses environmental challenges that need proper management. We conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment to evaluate the energy balance and environmental footprint of the most commonly used sludge management scenarios in BRICS countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Technologies such as incineration and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery units (i.e., cogeneration unit) maximize energy balance and minimize the environmental footprint, with incineration showing a superior performance. Shifting sludge management scenarios from the worst to the best can boost energy production by 1.4-98.4 times and cut the environmental footprint by 1.5-21.4 times. In 2050, these improvements could lead to a 98-fold boost in energy generation and a 25-fold drop in carbon emissions, according to the Announced Pledges Scenarios. Optimizing parameters such as volatile solids and anaerobic digestion efficiency further boosts energy output and minimizes the environmental footprint. This study offers robust evidence to support sustainable sludge management and thus promote energy recovery and carbon neutrality goals, guide technological transitions, and inform policymaking for sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption on the ecological footprint: the role of environmental policy in BRICS countries
    Nattapan Kongbuamai
    Quocviet Bui
    Suthep Nimsai
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 27885 - 27899
  • [2] The effects of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption on the ecological footprint: the role of environmental policy in BRICS countries
    Kongbuamai, Nattapan
    Bui, Quocviet
    Nimsai, Suthep
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (22) : 27885 - 27899
  • [3] The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries
    Mucahit Aydin
    Yunus Emre Turan
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 43233 - 43245
  • [4] The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries
    Aydin, Mucahit
    Turan, Yunus Emre
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (34) : 43233 - 43245
  • [5] Determinants of material footprint in BRICS countries: an empirical analysis
    Sahoo, Malayaranjan
    Saini, Seema
    Villanthenkodath, Muhammed Ashiq
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (28) : 37689 - 37704
  • [6] Determinants of material footprint in BRICS countries: an empirical analysis
    Malayaranjan Sahoo
    Seema Saini
    Muhammed Ashiq Villanthenkodath
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 37689 - 37704
  • [7] The influence of institutional quality on environmental efficiency of energy consumption in BRICS countries
    Rasheed, Noman
    Khan, Dilawar
    Magda, Robert
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [8] Nonlinear impacts of energy consumption and globalization on ecological footprint: Empirical research from BRICS countries
    Sun, Qingru
    Ma, Ruxia
    Xi, Zenglei
    Wang, He
    Jiang, Ce
    Chen, Hanyu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 396
  • [9] Determinants of ecological footprint in BRICS countries: a panel data analysis
    Ucan, Okyay
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    Turgut, Ecem
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 26 (10) : 26839 - 26852
  • [10] Energy Cooperation between BRICS Countries(Ⅱ)
    Alina Steblyanskaya
    Wang Zhen
    Iskritskaya Nataliya
    Svetlana Razmanova
    China Oil & Gas, 2018, 25 (01) : 55 - 63