共 50 条
Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in Medicare patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective claims analysis (2015-2020)
被引:0
|作者:
Jun, Monika P.
[1
]
Mutebi, Alex
[1
]
Chhibber, Anindit
[1
]
Liang, Chenxue
[2
]
Keshishian, Allison
[2
]
Wang, Anthony
[3
]
Navarro, Fernando Rivas
[4
]
Kalsekar, Anupama
[1
]
He, Jing
[1
]
Wang, Tongsheng
[1
]
机构:
[1] Genmab, Plainsboro, NJ USA
[2] Genesis Res, Hoboken, NJ USA
[3] AbbVie, N Chicago, IL USA
[4] Genmab AS, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词:
Large B cell lymphoma;
chimeric antigen receptor therapy;
cost of illness;
economic burden;
event-free survival;
hospitalization;
non-Hodgkin lymphoma;
standard of care;
treatment patterns;
healthcare resource utilization;
I10;
I1;
I;
I19;
LINE;
D O I:
10.1080/13696998.2024.2399435
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
AimsTo understand treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and the economic burden of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in elderly adults in the US.Materials and methodsThis retrospective database analysis utilized US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data from 2015 to 2020 to describe DLBCL patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs among patients aged >= 66 years. Patients were indexed at DLBCL diagnosis and required to have continuous enrollment from 12 months pre-index until 3 months post-index. HCRU and costs (USD 2022) are reported as per-patient per-month (PPPM) estimates.ResultsA total of 11,893 patients received >= 1-line (L) therapy; 1,633 and 391 received >= 2 L and >= 3 L therapies, respectively. Median (Q1, Q3) age at 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L initiation, respectively, was 76 (71, 81), 77 (72, 82), and 77 (72, 82) years. The most common therapy was R-CHOP (70.9%) for 1 L and bendamustine +/- rituximab for 2 L (18.7%) and 3 L (17.4%). CAR T was used by 14.8% of patients in 3 L. Overall, 39.6% (1 L), 42.1% (2 L), and 47.8% (3 L) of patients had all-cause hospitalizations. All-cause mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM during each line were $22,060 ($20,121 [$16,676-$24,597]) in 1 L, $30,027 ($20,868 [$13,416-$31,016]) in 2 L, and $47,064 ($25,689 [$15,555-$44,149]) in 3 L, with increasing costs driven primarily by inpatient expenses. Total all-cause 3 L mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM for patients with and without CAR T were $153,847 ($100,768 [$26,534-$253,630]) and $28,466 ($23,696 [$15,466-$39,107]), respectively.ConclusionsNo clear standard of care exists in 3 L therapy for older adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. The economic burden of DLBCL intensifies with each progressing line of therapy, thus underscoring the need for additional therapeutic options.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1167
页数:11
相关论文