共 41 条
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric-metabolic surgery. Are we still expecting to overcome the learning curve? A propensity score-matched analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database
被引:2
|作者:
Aeschbacher, Pauline
[1
,2
,3
]
Garoufalia, Zoe
[4
]
Rogers, Peter
[4
]
Dourado, Justin
[4
]
Liang, Hong
[5
]
Pena, Ana
[1
,2
]
Szomstein, Samuel
[1
,2
]
Lo Menzo, Emanuele
[1
,2
]
Rosenthal, Raul J.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Gen Surg, 2950 Cleveland Clin Blvd, Weston, FL 33331 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Bariatr & Metab Inst, Weston, FL USA
[3] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Visceral Surg & Med, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Cleveland Clin Florida, Ellen Leifer Shulman & Steven Shulman Digest Dis C, Weston, FL USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Clin Res, Weston, FL USA
关键词:
Robotic surgery;
Bariatric surgery;
Minimal invasive surgery;
Conventional laparoscopic;
Postoperative outcomes;
Y GASTRIC BYPASS;
OBESITY;
COMPLICATIONS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.soard.2024.03.017
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Robotic surgery is becoming increasingly popular in bariatric-metabolic surgery. However, its superiority regarding postoperative outcomes compared with conventional laparoscopy has not been clearly proven. With growing adoption of robotic surgery and improved technologies, benefits should become more evident. Objectives: Evaluate readmission and reoperation rates after bariatric-metabolic surgery performed by conventional laparoscopy versus robotic-assisted from 2015 to 2021. Setting: Academic institution. Methods: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) was reviewed for primary bariatric operations performed with conventional laparoscopy versus robotic-assisted. Postoperative outcomes were compared in a propensity score-matched sample. Results: Of 1,059,348 cases meeting inclusion criteria, 921,322 (87%) were conventional laparoscopic bariatric-metabolic surgeries, which were matched 1:1 with robotic-assisted cases (138,026). Reoperation (odds ratio [OR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.15, P = .0463), postoperative morbidity (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01-1.12, P = .0193), readmission (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09-1.18, P <.0001), and emergency department visits (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03-1.09, P = .0003) at 30 days postoperatively were significantly greater for robotic-assisted cases. Robotic-assisted cases had a similar mortality rate at 30 days postoperatively and length of stay >3 days when compared with conventional laparoscopic cases. Similar results were observed in cases from 2020 to 2021, except for reoperation and emergency department visits, which showed no difference between groups and length of stay >3 days, which was greater in robotic-assisted cases. Conclusions: Our results show a greater readmission and reoperation rate and greater morbidity at 30 days postoperatively in robotic-assisted bariatric-metabolic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy. Analyzing only cases performed between 2020 and 2021, robotic surgery also does not American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 839
页数:9
相关论文