Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric-metabolic surgery. Are we still expecting to overcome the learning curve? A propensity score-matched analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database

被引:2
|
作者
Aeschbacher, Pauline [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Garoufalia, Zoe [4 ]
Rogers, Peter [4 ]
Dourado, Justin [4 ]
Liang, Hong [5 ]
Pena, Ana [1 ,2 ]
Szomstein, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Lo Menzo, Emanuele [1 ,2 ]
Rosenthal, Raul J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Gen Surg, 2950 Cleveland Clin Blvd, Weston, FL 33331 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Bariatr & Metab Inst, Weston, FL USA
[3] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Visceral Surg & Med, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Cleveland Clin Florida, Ellen Leifer Shulman & Steven Shulman Digest Dis C, Weston, FL USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Clin Res, Weston, FL USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Bariatric surgery; Minimal invasive surgery; Conventional laparoscopic; Postoperative outcomes; Y GASTRIC BYPASS; OBESITY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2024.03.017
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Robotic surgery is becoming increasingly popular in bariatric-metabolic surgery. However, its superiority regarding postoperative outcomes compared with conventional laparoscopy has not been clearly proven. With growing adoption of robotic surgery and improved technologies, benefits should become more evident. Objectives: Evaluate readmission and reoperation rates after bariatric-metabolic surgery performed by conventional laparoscopy versus robotic-assisted from 2015 to 2021. Setting: Academic institution. Methods: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) was reviewed for primary bariatric operations performed with conventional laparoscopy versus robotic-assisted. Postoperative outcomes were compared in a propensity score-matched sample. Results: Of 1,059,348 cases meeting inclusion criteria, 921,322 (87%) were conventional laparoscopic bariatric-metabolic surgeries, which were matched 1:1 with robotic-assisted cases (138,026). Reoperation (odds ratio [OR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.15, P = .0463), postoperative morbidity (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01-1.12, P = .0193), readmission (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09-1.18, P <.0001), and emergency department visits (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03-1.09, P = .0003) at 30 days postoperatively were significantly greater for robotic-assisted cases. Robotic-assisted cases had a similar mortality rate at 30 days postoperatively and length of stay >3 days when compared with conventional laparoscopic cases. Similar results were observed in cases from 2020 to 2021, except for reoperation and emergency department visits, which showed no difference between groups and length of stay >3 days, which was greater in robotic-assisted cases. Conclusions: Our results show a greater readmission and reoperation rate and greater morbidity at 30 days postoperatively in robotic-assisted bariatric-metabolic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy. Analyzing only cases performed between 2020 and 2021, robotic surgery also does not American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 839
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [11] Outcomes after metabolic and bariatric surgery in preteens versus teens using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database and center-specific data
    Shah, Adil
    Liang, Norah E.
    Bruzoni, Mattias
    Pratt, Janey S. A.
    Zitsman, Jeffrey
    Nadler, Evan P.
    OBESITY, 2024, 32 (01) : 150 - 155
  • [12] EFFECT OF OPERATIVE TIMES IN BARIATRIC SURGERY ON OVERALL OUTCOMES: A MATCHED ANALYSIS OF THE METABOLIC AND BARIATRIC SURGERY ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DATABASE Post-operative complications
    Marrero, K.
    Clapp, B.
    Corbett, J.
    Sharma, I.
    Vahibe, A.
    McKenzie, T.
    Ghanem, O.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (SUPPL 2) : 164 - 165
  • [13] Comparative analysis of sleeve conversions of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program 2020 Database
    Clapp, Benjamin
    Cottam, Samuel
    Salame, Marita
    Marr, John D.
    Galvani, Carlos
    Ponce, Jaime
    English, Wayne J.
    Ghanem, Omar M.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2024, 20 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [14] Racial disparities in the utilization and outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: an 8-year analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program data
    Abuhasan, Qais
    Miller, Payton M.
    Li, Wendy S.
    Burney, Charles P.
    Yuce, Tarik K.
    Stefanidis, Dimitrios
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2025, 21 (02) : 158 - 165
  • [15] Indications and Outcomes of Endoscopic Gastric Pouch Plications After Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database
    Wills, Melissa V.
    Barajas-Gamboa, Juan S.
    Romero-Velez, Gustavo
    Strong, Andrew
    Navarrete, Salvador
    Corcelles, Ricard
    Abril, Carlos
    Pantoja, Juan Pablo
    Guerron, Alfredo D.
    Rodriguez, John
    Kroh, Matthew
    Dang, Jerry
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2025, 35 (03) : 725 - 732
  • [16] Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery Compared to Standard Laparoscopic Approach Using a Standardized Definition: First Look at the 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) Data
    El Chaar, Maher
    Petrick, Anthony
    Clapp, Benjamin
    Stoltzfus, Jill
    Alvarado, Luis A. A.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (07) : 2025 - 2039
  • [17] Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery Compared to Standard Laparoscopic Approach Using a Standardized Definition: First Look at the 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) Data
    Maher El Chaar
    Anthony Petrick
    Benjamin Clapp
    Jill Stoltzfus
    Luis A. Alvarado
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 2025 - 2039
  • [18] Impact of progressive chronic kidney disease stage on postoperative outcomes in metabolic surgery-a propensity-matched analysis using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement database
    Corpodean, Florina
    Kachmar, Michael
    LapPenna, Kyle B.
    Danos, Denise
    Cook, Michael
    Schauer, Philip R.
    Albaugh, Vance L.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2024, 20 (09) : 872 - 879
  • [19] Comparison of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus surgical sleeve gastrectomy: a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database analysis
    Gudur, Anuragh R.
    Geng, Calvin X.
    Kshatri, Sonia
    Martin, David
    Haug, Rebecca
    Radlinski, Mark
    Lei, Yang
    Buerlein, Ross C. D.
    Strand, Daniel S.
    Sauer, Bryan G.
    Shami, Vanessa M.
    Hallowell, Peter
    Schirmer, Bruce
    Wang, Andrew Y.
    Podboy, Alexander
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (01) : 11 - +
  • [20] Comment on: Outcomes in racial and ethnic minorities following revisional robotic-assisted metabolic and bariatric surgery: a matched analysis of the MBSAQIP database
    Corcelles, Ricard
    Del Gobbo, Gabriel Diaz
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2020, 16 (12) : 1937 - 1938