Erector spinae plane block level does not impact analgesic efficacy in enhanced recovery for lumbar spine surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Liou, Jing-Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Hsin-Yi [2 ,3 ]
Yao, Yu-Cheng [3 ,4 ]
Chou, Po-Hsin [3 ,4 ]
Sung, Chun-Sung [2 ,3 ]
Teng, Wei-Nung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Su, Fu-Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tsou, Mei-Yung [2 ,3 ]
Ting, Chien-Kun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lo, Chun-Liang [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, 155,Sec 2,Linong St, Taipei City 155, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 201,Sec 2,Shipai Rd, Taipei City 11217, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Sch Med, Coll Med, 155,Sec 2,Linong St, Taipei City 112304, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, 201,Sec 2,Shipai Rd, Taipei City 11217, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Med Device Innovat & Translat Ctr, 155,Sec 2,Linong St, Taipei City 112304, Taiwan
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2024年 / 24卷 / 08期
关键词
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); Erector spinae plane block (ESPB); Multimodal analgesia; Opioid consumption; Postoperative pain management; Regional anesthesia; Spine surgery; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2024.04.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative pain control following spine surgery can be difficult. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs use multimodal approaches to manage postoperative pain. While an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is commonly utilized, the ideal distance for injection from the incision, referred to as the ES (ESPB to mid-surgical level) distance, remains undetermined. PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of varying ES distances for ESPB on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures of postoperative pain within the ERAS protocol. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients who underwent elective lumbar spine fusion surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures include the comparative postoperative NRS scores across groups at immediate (T1), 24 (T2), 48 (T3), and 72 (T4) hours postsurgery. For secondary outcomes, a propensity matching analysis compared these outcomes between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups, with opioid-related recovery metrics also assessed. METHODS: All included patients were assigned to one of three ERAS groups according to the ES distance: Group 1 (G1, ES > 3 segments), Group 2 (G2, ES = 2-3 segments), and Group 3 (G3, ES<2 segments). Each patient underwent a bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with 60 mL of diluted ropivacaine or bupivacaine. RESULTS: Patients within the ERAS cohort reported mild pain (NRS < 3), with no significant NRS variation across G1 to G3 at any time. Sixty-five patients were matched across ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The ERAS group exhibited significantly lower NRS scores from T1 to T3 than the non-ERAS group. Total morphine consumption during hospitalization was 26.7 mg for ERAS and 41.5 mg for non-ERAS patients. The ERAS group resumed water and food intake sooner and had less postoperative nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: ESPBs can be effectively administered at or near the mid-surgical level to the low thoracic region for lumbar spine surgeries. Given challenges with sonovisualization, a lumbar ESPB may be preferred to minimize the risk of inadvertent pleural injury. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1416 / 1423
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Letter to the Editor Regarding "Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Terms of Analgesic Efficacy in Elderly Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery"
    Sethuraman, Raghuraman M.
    Arulmozhi, Shanmuga Priya
    Sathyaprakash, Divyashree
    Murugan, Raj
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2024, 13 (02) : 287 - 288
  • [12] Letter to the Editor Regarding “Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Terms of Analgesic Efficacy in Elderly Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery”
    Raghuraman M. Sethuraman
    Shanmuga Priya Arulmozhi
    Divyashree Sathyaprakash
    Raj Murugan
    Pain and Therapy, 2024, 13 : 287 - 288
  • [13] Erector spinae plane block at lower thoracic level for analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Jing-Jing Zhang
    Teng-Jiao Zhang
    Zong-Yang Qu
    Yong Qiu
    Zhen Hua
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2021, 9 (19) : 5126 - 5134
  • [14] Erector spinae plane block at lower thoracic level for analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Jing-Jing
    Zhang, Teng-Jiao
    Qu, Zong-Yang
    Qiu, Yong
    Hua, Zhen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (19) : 5126 - 5134
  • [15] Assessing the Evidence for Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgery
    Peng, Qing
    Zhang, Liang
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 40 (09): : 560 - 561
  • [16] EFFICACY OF THE ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE (ESP) BLOCK FOR LUMBAR SPINAL SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Ueshima, Hironobu
    Niihara, Fumihiro
    Inagaki, Mayumi
    Otake, Hiroshi
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128 : 891 - 891
  • [17] Transient paraplegia in lumbar spine surgery—a potential complication following erector spinae plane block
    K. Guna Pratheep
    Kartik Sonawane
    Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
    Ajoy Prasad Shetty
    Balavenkat J Subramanian
    Rishi Mugesh Kanna
    European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 3719 - 3723
  • [18] Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane blocks for lumbar spine surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Avis, Geoffrey
    Gricourt, Yann
    Vialatte, Pierre Baptiste
    Meunier, Victor
    Perin, Mikael
    Simon, Natacha
    Claret, Pierre-Geraud
    El Fertit, Hassan
    Lefrant, Jean-Yves
    Bertrand, Martin
    Cuvillon, Philippe
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (10) : 610 - 616
  • [19] The Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Fracture
    Yu, Yulong
    Wang, Mingcang
    Ying, Haifeng
    Ding, Jinfeng
    Wang, Hongzhu
    Wang, Yu
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 147 : E1 - E7
  • [20] Analgesic efficacy of the bilateral erector spinae plane block for colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Kekul O.
    Ustun Y.B.
    Kaya C.
    Turunç E.
    Dost B.
    Bilgin S.
    Ozkan F.
    Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, 2 (1):