Exploratory study of antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 using an indirect immunoperoxidase assay in COVID-19 patients and vaccinated volunteers

被引:0
|
作者
Katoh, Shungo [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yasuda, Ikkoh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kitakawa, Kazuhiro [5 ]
Hamaguchi, Sugihiro [1 ,6 ]
Sando, Eiichiro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fukushima Med Univ, Dept Gen Internal Med & Clin Infect Dis, Fukushima, Japan
[2] Kita Fukushima Med Ctr, Dept Gen Internal Med & Infect Dis, Fukushima, Japan
[3] Kita Fukushima Med Ctr, Inst Rickettsioses, Fukushima, Japan
[4] Imadachi Internal Med Clin, Fukuoka, Japan
[5] Fukushima Prefectural Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Microbiol, Fukushima, Japan
[6] Fukushima Med Univ, Dept Gen Internal Med, Fukushima, Japan
关键词
COVID-19; Antibody test; Indirect immunoperoxidase assay; ELISA; ROC analysis; Accuracy; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s41182-024-00635-y
中图分类号
R188.11 [热带医学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background A number of antibody test kits for detecting prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and post-immunization status have been commercialized. Indirect immunoperoxidase assay (IIP) is a conventional method to test antibodies. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and antibody titer profile of the IIP in COVID-19 and pre- and post-vaccination. Methods We conducted a hospital-based observational study in Fukushima prefecture, Japan. We enrolled COVID-19 inpatients who tested positive by PCR. We used serum samples collected > 10 years before the pandemic as the negative control. We also included volunteers vaccinated at the hospital. All participants were tested using an IIP with whole-cell antigen of the six SARS-CoV-2 variants isolated in Japan during the epidemic and an IgG ELISA kit. Negative controls and vaccinated volunteers were also tested using a lateral flow assay (LFA) kit. We conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and performed logistic regression analysis to explore factors associated with antibody titer. Results We included 146 COVID-19 inpatients, 38 negative controls, and 36 vaccinated volunteers. Most participants had the highest titer for IgG and IgM in the wild type-A antigen among the six variants. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the IgG ELISA kit were 60.3%, 100%, and 68.5%; of the IIP for IgG with the cutoff titer at 1:80, 82.2%, 94.7%, and 84.8%, respectively. The ROC curves of the ELISA and IIP for IgG were almost identical. In the IgG tests of the 36 volunteers, 35 were positive for ELISA and IIP and 34 for LFA after two vaccinations. IgM titers in the IIP were < = 1:40 in 114 patients and 32 volunteers after two vaccinations; therefore, the IgM titer is unsuitable for diagnosis. In COVID-19 patients, age, days from disease onset, > = 7 days after the second vaccination, and immunosuppressants for comorbidity were associated with IgG titer of > = 1:640 in the IIP. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of the IIP for detecting IgG antibodies in COVID-19 or after two vaccinations is equivalent to that of an ELISA. Further investigations are required to address the association between antibody titers in the IIP and their protective or harmful effects against COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers analysis in immune mediated inflammatory disease patients after COVID-19 vaccination: a monocentric retrospective study
    Delaleeuwe, I.
    Aoun, J.
    Hoyois, A.
    Brasseur, C.
    Di Romana, S.
    Muls, V.
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2023, 17 : 968 - 969
  • [42] SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19
    Sheng, Wang-Huei
    Ko, Wen-Chien
    Huang, Yhu-Chering
    Hsueh, Po-Ren
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 53 (03) : 363 - 364
  • [43] Infectivity assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in samples from patients with COVID-19
    Hiroi, Satoshi
    Kubota-Koketsu, Ritsuko
    Sasaki, Tadahiro
    Morikawa, Saeko
    Motomura, Kazushi
    Nakayama, Emi E.
    Okuno, Yoshinobu
    Shioda, Tatsuo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (10) : 5917 - 5923
  • [44] Analysis of IgG Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and Seasonal Coronaviruses in Vaccinated Adults against COVID-19, 2021
    Recalde-Reyes, Delia Piedad
    Rodriguez-Salazar, Carlos Andres
    INFECTIO, 2024, 28 (03) : 145 - 151
  • [45] The role of serum specific- SARS-CoV-2 antibody in COVID-19 patients
    Chen, Hao
    Zhang, Xinyu
    Liu, Wanjun
    Xue, Mingshan
    Liao, Chenxi
    Huang, Zhifeng
    Hu, Haisheng
    Sun, Baoqing
    INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 91
  • [46] Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Relation to the Contributing Factors in COVID-19 Patients
    Aziz, Hafsa
    Fatima, Shazia
    Mahmood, Humera
    Muhammad, Shahkhalid
    Saeed, Mohammad Adnan
    Khurshid, Shaista
    Aslam, Wardah
    Aziz, Saeeda
    Faheem, Mohammad
    VIRAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 35 (02) : 142 - 149
  • [47] Factors affecting antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with severe COVID-19
    Shang, Yufeng
    Liu, Tao
    Li, Jingfeng
    Wang, Xinghuan
    Zhou, Fuling
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (02) : 612 - 614
  • [48] Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in COVID-19 Patients and Neutralizing Antibody Level
    Ayhanci, Tugba
    Toptan, Hande
    Ozer, Yunus Emre
    Uzar, Serdar
    Enul, Hakan
    Adiay, Cumhur
    Sarac, Fahriye
    Dheir, Hamad
    Koroglu, Mehmet
    Hasoksuz, Mustafa
    Altindis, Mustafa
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2022, 56 (03): : 416 - 431
  • [49] Persistence of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of haemodialysis patients with COVID-19
    Forbes, Suzanne
    Davari, Maria
    Gnanasampanthan, Sahana
    Roth, Noam
    Young, Gregor
    Rajakariar, Ravindra
    Cove-Smith, Andrea
    Yaqoob, Muhammed Magdi
    Cutino-Moguel, Teresa
    Mahalingasivam, Viyaasan
    McCafferty, Kieran
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 36 (07) : 1292 - 1297
  • [50] Dynamic changes of serum SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in COVID-19 patients
    He, Lu
    Xu, Wanzhou
    Zeng, Cheng
    Li, Ying
    Lin, Ren
    Xie, Xiaojie
    Xia, Hongmiao
    Tang, Shiqi
    Xu, Lijuan
    Chen, Changzheng
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2022, 85 (01) : 90 - 92