Esophageal Cancer Outcomes After Definitive Chemotherapy With Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Abana, Chike O. [1 ]
Damen, Pim J. [2 ]
van Rossum, Peter S. N. [3 ]
Bravo, Pablo Lopez [1 ]
Wei, Xiong [1 ]
Pollard-Larkin, Julianne M. [4 ]
Nitsch, Paige L. [4 ]
Murphy, Mariela Blum [5 ]
Hofstetter, Wayne L. [6 ]
Liao, Zhongxing [1 ]
Lin, Steven H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Radiat Oncol, Unit 97,1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Inst, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Esophageal cancer; IMPT; Pencil beam proton therapy; Passive scatter proton therapy; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY PLUS SURGERY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; BEAM THERAPY; CARCINOMA; CHEMORADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The effectiveness of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy remains inadequately explored. We investigated long-term outcomes and toxicity experienced by patients who received IMPT as part of definitive esophageal cancer treatment. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified and analyzed 34 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received IMPT with concurrent chemotherapy as a definitive treatment regimen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2011 to 2021. The median IMPT dose was 50.4 GyRBE in 28 fractions; concurrent chemotherapy consisted of fluorouracil and/or taxane and/or platinum. Survival outcomes were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: The median age of all patients was 71.5 years. Most patients had stage III (cT3 cM0) adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus. At a median follow-up time of 39 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 41.1%; progression-free survival, 34.6%; local regional recurrence-free survival, 78.1%; and distant metastasis-free survival, 65.0%. Common acute chemoradiation therapy-related toxicities included hematologic toxicity, esophagitis (and late-onset), fatigue, weight loss, and nausea (and late-onset); grade 3 toxicity rates were 26.0% for hematologic, 18.0% for esophagitis and 9.0% for nausea. No patient had grade >= 3 wt loss or radiation pneumonitis, and no patients had pulmonary fibrosis or esophageal fistula. No grade >= 4 events were observed except for hematologic toxicity (lymphopenia) in 2 patients. Conclusion: Long-term survival and toxicity were excellent after IMPT for locally advanced esophageal cancer treated definitively with concurrent chemoradiation therapy. When available, IMPT should be offered to such patients to minimize treatment-related cardiopulmonary toxicity without sacrificing outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pericardial effusion after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
    Pao, Tzu-Hui
    Chang, Wei-Lun
    Chiang, Nai-Jung
    Lin, Chia-Ying
    Lai, Wu-Wei
    Tseng, Yau-Lin
    Lin, Forn-Chia
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [2] Pericardial effusion after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
    Tzu-Hui Pao
    Wei-Lun Chang
    Nai-Jung Chiang
    Chia-Ying Lin
    Wu-Wei Lai
    Yau-Lin Tseng
    Forn-Chia Lin
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [3] Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis
    Xi, Mian
    Xu, Cai
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Chang, Joe Y.
    Gomez, Daniel R.
    Jeter, Melenda
    Cox, James D.
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Mehran, Reza
    Blum, Mariela A.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Bhutani, Manoop S.
    Lee, Jeffrey H.
    Weston, Brian
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Lin, Steven H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (03): : 667 - 676
  • [4] Esophageal fistula after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Pao, Tzu-Hui
    Chen, Ying-Yuan
    Chang, Wei-Lun
    Chang, Jeffrey Shu-Ming
    Chiang, Nai-Jung
    Lin, Chia-Ying
    Lai, Wu-Wei
    Tseng, Yau-Lin
    Yen, Yi-Ting
    Chung, Ta-Jung
    Lin, Forn-Chia
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [5] Long-Term Outcomes and Toxicity in Esophageal Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant or Definitive Concurrent Chemotherapy with Proton Beam Therapy
    Abana, C. O.
    Carriere, P. P.
    Damen, P.
    van Rossum, P. S. N.
    Bravo, P. Lopez
    Wei, X.
    Pollard, J. M.
    Nitsch, P. L.
    Murphy, M. Blum
    Hofstetter, W.
    Liao, Z.
    Lint, S. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E280 - E281
  • [6] Recent advances in intensity modulated radiotherapy and proton therapy for esophageal cancer
    Xi, Mian
    Lin, Steven H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2017, 17 (07) : 635 - 646
  • [7] Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy as definitive treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer
    Roeder, Falk
    Nicolay, Nils H.
    Tam Nguyen
    Saleh-Ebrahimi, Ladan
    Askoxylakis, Vasilis
    Bostel, Tilman
    Zwicker, Felix
    Debus, Juergen
    Timke, Carmen
    Huber, Peter E.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [8] Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy as definitive treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer
    Falk Roeder
    Nils H Nicolay
    Tam Nguyen
    Ladan Saleh-Ebrahimi
    Vasilis Askoxylakis
    Tilman Bostel
    Felix Zwicker
    Juergen Debus
    Carmen Timke
    Peter E Huber
    Radiation Oncology, 9
  • [9] Work Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) versus Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy (IMRT) for Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Smith, Grace L.
    Fu, Shuangshuang
    Ning, Matthew S.
    Nguyen, Diem-Khanh
    Busse, Paul M.
    Foote, Robert L.
    Garden, Adam S.
    Gunn, Gary B.
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    Morrison, William H.
    Chronowski, Gregory M.
    Shah, Shalin J.
    Mayo, Lauren L.
    Phan, Jack
    Reddy, Jay P.
    Snider, James W.
    Patel, Samir H.
    Katz, Sanford R.
    Lin, Alexander
    Mohammed, Nasiruddin
    Dagan, Roi
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Rosenthal, David, I
    Frank, Steven J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2021, 8 (01) : 319 - 327
  • [10] Definitive Reirradiation of Intracranial Neoplasms With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy: Early Outcomes and Toxicities
    Maillie, L.
    Sharma, S.
    Yang, J. T.
    Ohri, N.
    Choi, I. J.
    Yeh, B. K.
    Press, R. H.
    Chhabra, A.
    Garg, M. K.
    Yamada, Y.
    Simone, C. B., II
    Lazarev, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E594 - E594