The impact of public procurement on the adoption of circular economy practices

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Shuxiao [1 ]
Li, Wentao [2 ]
Sun, Xiaowei [3 ]
Lin, Xiao [4 ]
机构
[1] Minjiang Univ, Newhuadu Business Sch, 200 Xiyuangong Rd, Fuzhou 350108, Minhou County, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Management, 161 Yinglong Rd, Guangzhou 510520, Tianhe County, Peoples R China
[3] Ocean Univ China, Sch Econ, 238 Songling Rd, Qingdao 266100, Laoshan County, Peoples R China
[4] Univ York, Sch Business & Soc, Church Lane Bldg, York YO10 5ZF, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Public procurement; Circular economy; Secondary data analysis; Market power; Institutional ownership; China; MARKET POWER; INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP; GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT; SUPPLY CHAIN; MANAGEMENT; CHINA; INVESTMENT; CONTRACTS; BARRIERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100907
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In recent years, the circular economy (CE) has drawn considerable attention from both academia and industry alike, with public procurement emerging as a widely adopted public policy tool for achieving economic goals and sustainable social development. However, the impact of public procurement on firms' adoption of the CE and the mechanism affecting this relation are not fully understood. By analyzing a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2010 to 2020 based on logit regression models, we find that supplier firms engaging in public procurement are more likely to adopt CE practices. In addition, we find that an increase in firms' market power weakens the positive effect of public procurement on CE adoption, whereas government attention and institutional ownership strengthen this effect. Furthermore, we distinguish between local governments and the Chinese central government as buyers and find that local governments play a more significant role in promoting CE adoption than the central government. This study provides the first empirical evidence of the relation between public procurement and CE adoption and identifies the mechanism by which public procurement affects CE adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFICIENCY VERSUS ECONOMY IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
    Nemec, Juraj
    Sumpikova, Marketa
    Klazar, Stanislav
    Grega, Matus
    [J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2014, : 1054 - 1063
  • [32] A Review of Bioplastics and Their Adoption in the Circular Economy
    Di Bartolo, Alberto
    Infurna, Giulia
    Dintcheva, Nadka Tzankova
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [33] Informal practices and efficiency in public procurement
    Rodionova, Yuliya
    Nemec, Juraj
    Tkachenko, Andrey
    Yakovlev, Andrei
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 44 (03) : 225 - 233
  • [34] Tourist practices in the circular economy
    Sorensen, Flemming
    Baerenholdt, Jorgen Ole
    [J]. ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2020, 85
  • [35] The impact of public procurement system on the development of competition in the economy in the light of empirical research
    Borowiec, Arkadiusz
    [J]. OECONOMIA COPERNICANA, 2017, 8 (01) : 37 - 50
  • [36] Precursors of circular economy practices
    Agyapong, Daniel
    Agyapong, Gloria
    Frimpong, Stephanie Efua
    [J]. CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 12
  • [37] The impact of public procurement rules and the administrative practices of public procurers on bid rigging: the case of Vietnam
    Tam Thanh Tran
    Bevacqua, John
    Hang Minh Nguyen
    Hoang Tien Nguyen
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC LAW REVIEW, 2018, 26 (01) : 36 - 58
  • [38] Circular economy tourist practices
    Sorensen, Flemming
    Baerenholdt, Jorgen Ole
    Greve, Kim Andreas Gjetting Moller
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2020, 23 (22) : 2762 - 2765
  • [39] The Circular Economy and Circular Building Practices in Luxembourg
    Hild P.
    [J]. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2023, 3 (4): : 1963 - 1988
  • [40] Adoption intentions of electronic procurement among public sector organisations (PSOs) in Ghana: emerging economy perspective
    Ofori, Daniel
    Light, Osman
    Ankomah, Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 2023, 23 (02) : 179 - 199