共 50 条
Cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF vaccine and nirsevimab for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in Canadian infants
被引:3
|作者:
Gebretekle, Gebremedhin B.
[1
]
Yeung, Man Wah
[1
]
Ximenes, Raphael
[1
]
Cernat, Alexandra
[1
,2
]
Simmons, Alison E.
[1
,3
]
Killikelly, April
[1
]
Siu, Winnie
[1
,4
]
Rafferty, Ellen
[5
,6
]
Brousseau, Nicholas
[7
,8
]
Tunis, Matthew
[1
]
Tuite, Ashleigh R.
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Publ Hlth Agcy Canada, Ctr Immunizat Programs, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hlth Policy PhD Program, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Inst Hlth Econ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[6] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[7] Inst Natl Sante Publ Quebec, Biol Risks Unit, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[8] Univ Laval, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源:
基金:
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词:
RSV;
RSVpreF;
Nirsevimab;
Cost-effectiveness;
Cost-utility;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
UNITED-STATES;
GESTATIONAL-AGE;
IMPACT;
RSV;
D O I:
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126164
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background: Health Canada recently authorized the RSVpreF pregnancy vaccine and nirsevimab to protect infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease. Objective: Assess the cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF and nirsevimab programs in preventing RSV disease in infants, compared to a palivizumab program. Methods: We used a static cohort model of a Canadian birth cohort during their first RSV season to estimate sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for nine strategies implemented over a one-year time period, from the health system and societal perspectives. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties on the results. Results: All-infants nirsevimab programs averted more RSV-related outcomes than year-round RSVpreF programs, with the most RSV cases averted in a seasonal nirsevimab program with catch-up. Assuming list prices for these immunizing agents, all-infants nirsevimab and year-round RSVpreF programs were never cost-effective, with ICERs far exceeding commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. Seasonal nirsevimab with catch-up for infants born outside the RSV season was a cost-effective program if prioritized for infants at moderate/high-risk (ICER <$28,000 per QALY) or those living in settings with higher RSV burden and healthcare costs, such as remote communities where transport would be complex (ICER of $5700 per QALY). Using a $50,000 per QALY threshold, an all-infants nirsevimab program could be optimal if nirsevimab is priced at <$110-190 per dose. A year-round RSVpreF for all pregnant women and pregnant people plus nirsevimab for infants at high-risk was optimal if nirsevimab is priced at >$110-190 per dose and RSVpreF priced at <$60-125 per dose. Interpretation: Prophylactic interventions can substantially reduce RSV disease in infants, and more focused nirsevimab programs are the most cost-effective option at current product prices.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文