From design to implementation: Lessons from planning the first marine protected area network in Canada

被引:0
|
作者
Beaty, Fiona [1 ]
Brown, Kil Hltaanuwaay Tayler [2 ]
Braun, Julien [2 ]
Diggon, Steve [1 ]
Hartley, Emery [3 ]
Heidt, Aaron [1 ]
Maddin, Heather [3 ]
Maloney, Avery [1 ]
Martone, Rebecca [4 ]
Mcdougall, Chris [5 ]
Reid, Mike [6 ,7 ]
Robb, Carrie [7 ]
Rubidge, Emily [7 ]
Short, Charles
Worsley, Kristin
机构
[1] Coastal First Nations Great Bear Initiat, 409 Granville St Su 1660, Vancouver, BC V6C 1T2, Canada
[2] Council Haida Nation, POB 87, Massett, BC V0T 1M0, Canada
[3] BC Minist Water Land & Resource Stewardship, Victoria, BC V8W 9C3, Canada
[4] Tula Fdn, Ocean Decade Collaborat Ctr NE Pacific, POB 25039, Campbell River, BC V9W 0B7, Canada
[5] Pk Canada, 711 Broughton St, Victoria, BC V8W 1E2, Canada
[6] Heiltsuk Integrated Resource Management Dept, Hailzaqv Nation, Waglisla, BC, Canada
[7] Fisheries & Oceans Canada, 3190 Hammond Bay Rd, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7, Canada
关键词
Marine protected areas; MPA Network; Co-governance; Multiple ways of knowing; Conservation planning; Marine spatial planning; OUTCOMES; RESERVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106360
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The social-ecological outcomes of marine protected areas (MPAs) can be amplified when sites are designed in networks that function cooperatively and synergistically. From 2015-2024, seventeen First Nations, the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada collaboratively developed a Network Action Plan to establish an MPA Network for the Northern Shelf Bioregion (NSB). The NSB is a diverse and complex social-ecological region in British Columbia that spans an area of 102,000 km(2) from Northern Vancouver Island to the Alaska border. Here, we describe the MPA Network planning process and the transition from Network planning to implementation. We discuss key elements of success that enabled the Network Action Plan's collaborative development and lessons learned to inform and improve regional MPA Network implementation and global MPA Network planning and implementation. All phases of the planning process, including governance, development, engagement, design, and analysis, were guided by the following principles: collaborative governance, multiple ways of knowing, participatory engagement, and adaptation to new information. The Network Action Plan's dynamic design process resulted in innovative approaches and tools to protect conservation objectives throughout the NSB. As the NSB MPA Network process transitions from planning toward implementation, collaborative governance, network monitoring, and ongoing participatory engagement processes will play a central role in advancing the goals and objectives articulated in the Network Action Plan and ensuring equitable social-ecological outcomes. Overall, the NSB MPA Network planning process provides a model for collaborative design of MPA Networks and can inform co-governance and co-management processes throughout the world.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using Ostrom's principles to assess institutional dynamics of conservation: Lessons from a marine protected area in Brazil
    Tebet, Guilherme
    Trimble, Micaela
    Medeiros, Rodrigo Pereira
    MARINE POLICY, 2018, 88 : 174 - 181
  • [42] Climate change, biodiversity conservation and protected area planning in Canada
    Lemieux, CJ
    Scott, DJ
    CANADIAN GEOGRAPHER-GEOGRAPHE CANADIEN, 2005, 49 (04): : 384 - 399
  • [43] Bridging the divide: Social-ecological coherence in Marine Protected Area network design
    Rees, Sian E.
    Pittman, Simon J.
    Foster, Nicola
    Langmead, Olivia
    Griffiths, Charly
    Fletcher, Steve
    Johnson, David E.
    Attrill, Martin
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2018, 28 (03) : 754 - 763
  • [44] Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: A successful case study from north central California
    Gleason, Mary
    McCreary, Scott
    Miller-Henson, Melissa
    Ugoretz, John
    Fox, Evan
    Merrifield, Matt
    McClintock, Will
    Serpa, Paulo
    Hoffman, Kathryn
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 53 (02) : 52 - 68
  • [45] Progress in marine geoconservation in Scotland's seas: assessment of key interests and their contribution to Marine Protected Area network planning
    Gordon, John E.
    Brooks, Anthony J.
    Chaniotis, Peter D.
    James, Ben D.
    Kenyon, Neil H.
    Leslie, Alick B.
    Long, David
    Rennie, Alistair F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE GEOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION, 2016, 127 (06) : 716 - 737
  • [46] Adaptive Comanagement of a Marine Protected Area Network in Fiji
    Weeks, Rebecca
    Jupiter, Stacy D.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (06) : 1234 - 1244
  • [47] Incorporating climate change adaptation into marine protected area planning
    Wilson, Kristen L.
    Tittensor, Derek P.
    Worm, Boris
    Lotze, Heike K.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (06) : 3251 - 3267
  • [48] Capacity building and community involvement in marine protected area implementation
    Pomeroy, RS
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTY-FOURTH ANNUAL GULF AND CARIBBEAN FISHERIES INSTITUTE, 2003, : 689 - 693
  • [49] Key lessons from the implementation of an ERP at Pratt & Whitney Canada
    Tchokogué, A
    Bareil, C
    Duguay, CR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2005, 95 (02) : 151 - 163
  • [50] Finding harmony in Marine Protected Area design guidelines
    Burns, Echelle S. S.
    Lopazanski, Cori
    Flower, Jason
    Thomas, Lennon R. R.
    Bradley, Darcy
    Lester, Sarah E. E.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2023, 5 (06)