Behavioral interventions for teaching perspective-taking skills: A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Diaz-Borda, Gisell Andrea [1 ]
Garcia-Zambrano, Sebastian [2 ]
Flores, Eileen Pfeiffer [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brasilia, Behav Sci, Brasilia, Brazil
[2] Mt St Marys Univ, Emmitsburg, MD USA
[3] Univ Brasilia, Dept Basic Psychol Proc, Brasilia, Brazil
关键词
Perspective taking; Behavioral interventions; Training protocols; Behavioral approach; Scoping review; DEICTIC RELATIONAL REPERTOIRE; THEORY-OF-MIND; CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCE; CHILDREN; AUTISM; REINFORCEMENT; METAANALYSIS; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100816
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This scoping review examines 29 experimental studies on behavioral interventions aimed at teaching perspective-taking (PT) skills, identified through a comprehensive search strategy (PROSPERO: CRD42021252722) and adhering to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The review aimed to (1) identify PT enhancement protocols and their components, (2) assess behavioral measures of protocol efficacy, and (3) describe demographic, bibliometric, and ethical study characteristics. Key findings include a diversity in PT conceptualization aligned with two main theoretical approaches, the Non-Derived and the Derived Response approach, which can hinder comparability. Despite methodological differences, common teaching strategies such as prompting, modeling, and differential reinforcement are prevalent. The results indicate a notable shift from the Non-Derived to the Derived Response approach over time. Most participants were boys under ten with autism or other neurodivergences, and Single-Subject Designs were predominant. Additionally, many studies did not report the geographical origins of participants, which is crucial for understanding the cultural context in perspectivetaking research. There were also notable shortcomings in some methodological and ethical aspects, including the lack of participant diversity, insufficient assent from minors, and inadequate reporting of social validity and conflict of interest. The review underscores the need for improved methodological rigor and ethical standards to enhance study comparability and replicability. Future research should calculate effect sizes to provide quantitative measures of intervention effectiveness, thereby advancing the field's understanding of the practical implications of behavioral interventions for PT skills.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Teaching a perspective-taking component skill to children with autism in the natural environment
    Welsh, Fernanda
    Najdowski, Adel C.
    Strauss, Danielle
    Gallegos, Lindabeth
    Fullen, Jesse A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2019, 52 (02) : 439 - 450
  • [32] SPATIAL PERSPECTIVE-TAKING IN CONVERSATION
    SCHOBER, MF
    COGNITION, 1993, 47 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [33] SPATIAL PERSPECTIVE-TAKING IN CHILDREN
    COX, MV
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1978, 31 (MAY): : 168 - 169
  • [34] IMITATION WITHOUT PERSPECTIVE-TAKING
    HEYES, CM
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1993, 16 (03) : 524 - 525
  • [35] Contractualism and the Significance of Perspective-Taking
    Peter Timmerman
    Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2015, 18 : 909 - 925
  • [36] A Daoist interpretation of perspective-taking
    Tan, Charlene
    JOURNAL OF BELIEFS & VALUES-STUDIES IN RELIGION & EDUCATION, 2023, 44 (03): : 349 - 362
  • [37] PERSPECTIVE-TAKING AND PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR
    ZAHNWAXLER, C
    RADKEYARROW, M
    BRADYSMITH, J
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 13 (01) : 87 - 88
  • [38] Perspective-Taking and the Attribution of Ignorance
    Sammut, Gordon
    Sartawi, Mohammad
    JOURNAL FOR THE THEORY OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, 2012, 42 (02) : 181 - +
  • [39] Interacting Timescales in Perspective-Taking
    Dale, Rick
    Galati, Alexia
    Alviar, Camila
    Kallens, Pablo Contreras
    Ramirez-Aristizabal, Adolfo G.
    Tabatabaeian, Maryam
    Vinson, David W.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [40] Perspective-taking as an organizational capability
    Litchfield, Robert C.
    Gentry, Richard J.
    STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2010, 8 (03) : 187 - 205