Associations of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Eligibility Policies With Mammography

被引:1
|
作者
Kazmi, Ali R. [1 ]
Hussaini, S. M. Qasim [2 ]
Chino, Fumiko [3 ]
Yabroff, K. Robin [4 ]
Barnes, Justin M. [5 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, ONeal Comprehens Canc Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Affordabil Working Grp, New York, NY USA
[4] Amer Canc Soc, Dept Surveillance & Hlth Equ Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
Mammography; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; SNAP; public policy; difference-in-differences; access to care; HEALTH-CARE; MEDICAID EXPANSIONS; FOOD INSECURITY; ENROLLMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2024.04.028
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) addresses food insecurity for low-income households, which is associated with access to care. Many US states expanded SNAP access through policies eliminating the asset test (ie, restrictions based on SNAP applicant assets) and/or broadening income eligibility. The objective of this study was to determine whether state SNAP policies were associated with the use of mammography among women eligible for breast cancer screening. Methods: Data for income-eligible women 40 to 79 years of age were obtained from the 2006 to 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Difference-in-differences analyses were conducted to compare changes in the percentage of mammography in the past year from pre- to post-SNAP policy adoption (asset test elimination or income eligibility increase) between states that and did not adopt policies expanding SNAP eligibility. Results: In total, 171,684 and 294,647 income-eligible female respondents were included for the asset test elimination policy and income eligibility increase policy analyses, respectively. Mammography within 1 year was reported by 58.4%. Twenty-eight and 22 states adopted SNAP asset test elimination and income increase policies, respectively. Adoption of asset test elimination policies was associated with a 2.11(95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-4.15; P = .043) percentage point increase in mammography received within 1 year, particularly for nonmetropolitan residents (4.14 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.07-7.21 percentage points; P = .008), those with household incomes <$25,000 (2.82 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.68-4.97 percentage points; P = .01), and those residing in states in the South (3.08 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.17-5.99 percentage points; P = .038) or that did not expand Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (3.35 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.36-6.34; P = .028). There was no significant association between mammography and state-level policies broadening of SNAP income eligibility. Conclusions: State policies eliminating asset test requirements for SNAP eligibility were associated with increased mammography among low-income women eligible for breast cancer screening, particularly for those in the lowest income bracket or residing in nonmetropolitan areas or Medicaid nonexpansion states.
引用
收藏
页码:1406 / 1418
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Eligibility Policies With Adult Mental Health and Suicidality
    Austin, Anna E.
    Frank, Madeline
    Shanahan, Meghan E.
    Reyes, H. Luz McNaughton
    Corbie, Giselle
    Naumann, Rebecca B.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (04) : E238415
  • [2] State expansion of supplemental nutrition assistance program eligibility and rates of interpersonal violence
    Austin, Anna E.
    Shanahan, Meghan
    Frank, Madeline
    Reyes, H. Luz McNaughton
    Ammerman, Alice
    Short, Nicole A.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 175
  • [3] State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Policies and Substance Use Rates
    Naumann, Rebecca B.
    Frank, Madeline
    Shanahan, Meghan E.
    Reyes, H. Luz McNaughton
    Ammerman, Alice S.
    Corbie, Giselle
    Austin, Anna E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 66 (03) : 526 - 533
  • [4] State expansion of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program eligibility and rates of foster care entries
    Austin, Anna E.
    Naumann, Rebecca B.
    Shanahan, Meghan E.
    Frank, Madeline
    [J]. CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2023, 145
  • [5] Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Eligibility and HIV Incidence in the United States
    Richterman, Aaron
    Block, Jason P.
    Tsai, Alexander C.
    Ivers, Louise C.
    [J]. OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 8 (08):
  • [6] Do state Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program policies influence program participation among seniors?
    Jones, Jordan W.
    Courtemanche, Charles
    Denteh, Augustine
    Marton, James
    Tchernis, Rusty
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2022, 44 (02) : 591 - 608
  • [7] The Impact of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Policies on Asset Holdings
    Todd, Jessica E.
    Jo, Young
    Boohaker, James Richard
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2019, 41 (02) : 305 - 328
  • [8] Cardiometabolic Mortality by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation and Eligibility in the United States
    Conrad, Zach
    Rehm, Colin D.
    Wilde, Parke
    Mozaffarian, Dariush
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 107 (03) : 466 - 474
  • [9] Limiting Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Eligibility May Increase Sudden Death
    Davari, Danielle
    Mirzaei, Mojtaba
    Simpson, Ross J., Jr.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 180 (09) : 1259 - 1260
  • [10] Impact of county and state immigration policies on immigrant household enrollment in the supplemental nutrition assistance program
    Argibay, Sofia
    Auchincloss, Amy H.
    Chaparro, M. Pia
    Kravitz, Caroline
    Eastus, Alexandra
    Langellier, Brent A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIGRATION AND HEALTH, 2024, 9