Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Repair in Octogenarians

被引:2
|
作者
Masraf, Hannah [1 ]
Navaratnarajah, Manoraj [2 ]
Viola, Laura [2 ]
Sef, Davorin [2 ]
Malvindi, Pietro G. [3 ]
Miskolczi, Szabolcs [2 ]
Velissaris, Theodore [2 ]
Luthra, Suvitesh [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kingston Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Div Surg, Kingston Upon Thames KT2 7QB, England
[2] Southampton Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Wessex Cardiothorac Ctr, Div Cardiac Surg, Southampton SO16 6YD, England
[3] Polytech Univ Marche, Lancisi Cardiovasc Ctr, Cardiac Surg Unit, Ospedali Riuniti Marche, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[4] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Dept Human Dev & Hlth, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England
关键词
acute aortic dissection; type A aortic dissection; octogenarians; Stanford type A; aortic dissection repair; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EMERGENCY-SURGERY; REGISTRY; JAPAN;
D O I
10.3390/medsci12030045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The aims of this study were to assess the perioperative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival of octogenarians undergoing acute type A aortic dissection repair (ATAAD), and to compare open and closed distal anastomosis techniques. Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study (2007-2021). Open versus closed distal anastomosis were compared. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods were used to compare long-term survival. Results: Fifty octogenarian patients were included (median age-82 years; closed distal-22; open distal-28). Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 187 min (open distal vs. closed distal group; 219 min vs. 115.5 min, p < 0.01, respectively). Median cross-clamp time was 93 min (IQR; 76-130 min). Median circulatory arrest time was 26 min (IQR; 20-39 min) in the open-distal group. In-hospital mortality was 18% (open distal; 14.2% vs. closed distal; 22.7%, p = 0.44). Stroke was 26% (open distal; 28.6% vs. closed distal; 22.7%, p = 0.64). Median survival was 7.2 years (IQR; 4.5-11.6 years). Survival was comparable between open and closed distal groups (median 10.6 vs. 7.2 years, p = 0.35, respectively). Critical preoperative status (HR; 3.2, p = 0.03) and composite endpoint (renal replacement therapy, new neurological event, length of stay > 30 days or return to theatre; HR; 4.1, p = 0.02) predicted adverse survival. Open distal anastomosis did no impact survival. Conclusions: ATAAD repair in selected octogenarians has acceptable short- and long-term survival. There is no significant difference between open versus closed distal anastomosis strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-Term Outcomes of Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Jiang, Xiaolang
    Liu, Yifan
    Zou, Lingwei
    Chen, Bin
    Jiang, Junhao
    Fu, Weiguo
    Dong, Zhihui
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (01):
  • [32] Long-Term Outcome of Immediate Aortic Repair for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Complicated With Brain Malperfusion
    Tsukube, Takuro
    Nakai, Chikashi
    Kanno, Reiko
    Sakaguchi, Kazunori
    Kondo, Mayo
    Izumi, So
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [33] Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgical Repair in Octogenarians, Meta Analysis
    Awad, Ahmed K.
    Hasan, Mohammed Tarek
    Rezq, Hazem Salah
    Aboeldahab, Heba
    Elkhashab, Mohamed K.
    Hamouda, Salah Mahmoud
    Elkersh, Hassan
    Awad, Ayman K.
    Nabeel, Ambreen
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [34] Long-term Outcomes After Controlled Pericardial Drainage for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection
    Nakai, Chikashi
    Izumi, So
    Haraguchi, Tomonori
    Okada, Yasushi
    Ijuin, Shinichi
    Nakayama, Shinichi
    Tsukube, Takuro
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (04): : 1357 - 1363
  • [35] Long-term outcomes of total arch replacement with the non-frozen elephant trunk technique for Stanford Type A acute aortic dissection
    Inoue, Yosuke
    Matsuda, Hitoshi
    Omura, Atsushi
    Seike, Yoshimasa
    Uehara, Kyokun
    Sasaki, Hiroaki
    Kobayashi, Junjiro
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 27 (03) : 455 - 460
  • [36] Long-Term Survival in Patients With Acute Kidney Injury After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair
    Sasabuchi, Yusuke
    Kimura, Naoyuki
    Shiotsuka, Junji
    Komuro, Tetsuya
    Mouri, Hideyuki
    Ohnuma, Tetsu
    Asaka, Kayo
    Lefor, Alan K.
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    Yamaguchi, Atsushi
    Adachi, Hideo
    Sanui, Masamitsu
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 102 (06): : 2003 - 2009
  • [37] Impact of Different Aortic Entry Tear Sites on Early Outcomes and Long-Term Survival in Patients with Stanford A Acute Aortic Dissection
    Merkle, Julia
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Deppe, Antje Christin
    Weber, Saskia
    Mader, Navid
    Choi, Yeong-Hoon
    Liakopoulos, Oliver
    Kuhn-Regnier, Ferdinand
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2019, 67 (05): : 363 - 371
  • [38] Acute type A aortic dissection: long-term results and reoperations
    Bekkers, Jos A.
    Raap, Goris Bol
    Takkenberg, Johanna J. M.
    Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 43 (02) : 389 - 396
  • [39] Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: long-term results
    Moreo, A
    Russo, CF
    Lorusso, R
    Munforti, C
    Garatti, A
    Francesconi, M
    Vitali, E
    Mauri, F
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 638 - 639
  • [40] Long-term outcomes comparing endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians
    Scallan, Oonagh
    Novick, Teresa
    Power, Adam H.
    DeRose, Guy
    Duncan, Audra
    Dubois, Luc
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 71 (04) : 1162 - 1168