Machine learning models for predicting the rejection of organic pollutants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis membranes and unveiling the rejection mechanisms

被引:0
|
作者
Tayara, Adel [1 ]
Shang, Chii [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Jing [1 ]
Xiang, Yingying [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Hong Kong Branch, Chinese Natl Engn Res Ctr Control & Treatment Heav, Kowloon, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Forward osmosis; Reverse osmosis; Machine learning; Organic pollutant; Rejection mechanism; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; WASTE-WATER; PHARMACEUTICALS; REMOVAL; CONTAMINANTS; REUSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2024.122363
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) processes have been proven effective in rejecting organic pollutants, the rejection rate is highly dependent on compound and membrane characteristics, as well as operating conditions. This study aims to establish machine learning (ML) models for predicting the rejection of organic pollutants by FO and RO and providing insights into the underlying rejection mechanisms. Among the 14 ML models established, the random forest model (R-2 = 0.85) and extreme gradient boosting model (R-2 = 0.92) emerged as the best-performing models for FO and RO, respectively. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis identified the length of the compound, water flux, and hydrophobicity as the top three variables contributing to the FO model. For RO, in addition to the length of the compound and operating pressure, advanced variables including four molecular descriptors (e.g., ATSC2m and Balaban J) and three fingerprints (e. g., C=C double bond and carbonyl group) significantly contributed to the prediction. Besides, the associations between these highly ranked variables and their SHAP values shed light on the rejection mechanisms, such as size exclusion, adsorption, hydrophobic interaction, and electrostatic interaction, and illustrate the role of the operating parameters, such as the FO permeate water flux and RO operating pressure, in the rejection process. These findings provide interpretable predictive models for the removal of organic pollutants and advance the mechanistic understanding of the rejection mechanisms in the FO and RO processes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A mechanistic study on boron rejection by sea water reverse osmosis membranes
    Hyung, Hoon
    Kim, Jae-Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 286 (1-2) : 269 - 278
  • [32] Separation of organic pollutants by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes: Mathematical models and experimental verification
    Williams, M.E.
    Hestekin, J.A.
    Smothers, C.N.
    Bhattacharyya, D.
    [J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1999, 38 (10): : 3683 - 3695
  • [33] Separation of organic pollutants by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes: Mathematical models and experimental verification
    Williams, ME
    Hestekin, JA
    Smothers, CN
    Bhattacharyya, D
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1999, 38 (10) : 3683 - 3695
  • [34] Trace organic contaminant rejection by aquaporin forward osmosis membrane: Transport mechanisms and membrane stability
    Xie, Ming
    Luo, Wenhai
    Guo, Hao
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Tang, Chuyang Y.
    Gray, Stephen R.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2018, 132 : 90 - 98
  • [35] Comparison of flux behavior and synthetic organic compound removal by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis membranes
    Heo, Jiyong
    Boateng, Linkel K.
    Flora, Joseph R. V.
    Lee, Heebum
    Her, Namguk
    Park, Yong-Gyun
    Yoon, Yeomin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2013, 443 : 69 - 82
  • [36] Rejection of organic micropollutants from greywater with forward osmosis: A matter of time
    Mendoza, Esther
    Blandin, Gaetan
    Castano-Trias, Marc
    Alonso, Lucas Leonel
    Comas, Joaquim
    Buttiglieri, Gianluigi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (05):
  • [37] Influence of colloidal fouling on rejection of trace organic contaminants by reverse osmosis
    Ng, HY
    Elimelech, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2004, 244 (1-2) : 215 - 226
  • [38] Phenol rejection by cellulose triacetate and thin film composite forward osmosis membranes
    Xiao, Tingting
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Song, Jianfeng
    Bao, Ruyi
    Li, Xuemei
    He, Tao
    [J]. SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 186 : 45 - 54
  • [39] Comparison of tetracycline rejection in reclaimed water by three kinds of forward osmosis membranes
    Zheng, Yu
    Huang, Man-hong
    Chen, Liang
    Zheng, Wei
    Xie, Pan-ke
    Xu, Qi
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2015, 359 : 113 - 122
  • [40] Validating the rejection of trace organic chemicals by reverse osmosis membranes using a pilot-scale system
    Fujioka, Takahiro
    Khan, Stuart J.
    McDonald, James A.
    Nghiem, Long D.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2015, 358 : 18 - 26