The LTAR Cropland Common Experiment in the Upper Chesapeake Bay

被引:1
|
作者
Dell, Curtis J. [1 ]
Karsten, H. D. [2 ]
Laboski, C. A. M. [1 ]
Adams, Thomas S. [2 ]
Goslee, Sarah C. [1 ]
Adler, Paul R. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Unit, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, University Pk, PA USA
关键词
MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/jeq2.20606
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Dairy production is a key agricultural enterprise in the Upper Chesapeake Bay (UCB) basin, where phosphorous (P) and nitrogen (N) loading contribute to eutrophication. Import of forages and grains and application of mineral fertilizers contribute to nutrient imbalances in the basin. The UCB Long-Term Agroecosystem Research Cropland Common Experiment aims to evaluate diverse crop rotations that minimize the need for imported feed, maximize year-round living cover, and reduce nutrient losses. UCB's plot-scale experiment was established in 2018, incorporating an ongoing cropping system study that was established by the Pennsylvania State University in 2010. An alternative dairy cropping rotation (including silage and grain corn [Zea mayes L.], alfalfa [Medicago sativa L.]/orchardgrass [Dactylis glomerata L.] mix, winter rye silage [Secale cereale L.], and sorghum-sudangrass [Sorghum x drummondii (Steud.) Millsp. & Chas]) that employed manure injection, integrated pest management, and less frequent manure application was compared to a prevailing, conventionally managed silage corn-alfalfa rotation with higher manure application rates. A field-scale experiment was established in 2019 to monitor alternative production practices (manure injection and avoidance of neonicotinoid seed treatment) and prevailing practices in three fields on a commercial dairy farm. Findings suggest that crop rotation diversification, manure injection, and integrated pest management have the potential to increase the economic and environmental sustainability of dairy cropping systems, but long-term evaluation is needed for confirmation. The Upper Chesapeake Bay (UCB) LTAR represents the northern section of the bay watershed. UCB is largely forested with crops and pasture on less than 20% of the land area. Dairy is the most intensive agricultural enterprise in UCB. Prevailing conventional rotation is compared to an alternative diverse rotation with adaptive management. Continuous silage corn-rye silage double crop was adopted as the prevailing treatment in 2024. Dairy production is common in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and P and N losses from these farms can degrade water quality. Importing feed and fertilizers increases the quantities of P and N that must be managed. The Upper Chesapeake Bay Long-Term Agroecosystem Research Cropland Common Experiment addresses these concerns by studying crop rotations that minimize the need for imported feed and use alternative crop production methods that reduce nutrient losses. A plot-scale experiment with a 6-year crop rotation that includes manure injection, integrated pest management, and lower manure application rates is compared to a conventional dairy forage system. A field-scale experiment has been used to monitor alternative production practices on a commercial dairy farm. Findings suggest that diverse crop rotations, manure injection, and integrated pest management have the potential to increase the economic and environmental sustainability of dairy cropping systems.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 831
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HISTORICAL CHANGES IN SUBMERGED MACROPHYTE COMMUNITIES OF UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY
    DAVIS, FW
    ECOLOGY, 1985, 66 (03) : 981 - 993
  • [32] Home range of largemouth bass in the tidal upper Chesapeake Bay
    Heft, AA
    Richardson-Heft, CA
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES, 2002, : 17 - 25
  • [33] INFLUENCE OF PREDATION ON INFAUNAL ABUNDANCE IN UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY, USA
    HOLLAND, AF
    MOUNTFORD, NK
    HIEGEL, MH
    KAUMEYER, KR
    MIHURSKY, JA
    MARINE BIOLOGY, 1980, 57 (03) : 221 - 235
  • [34] DISTRIBUTION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF FECAL INDICATOR ORGANISMS IN UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY
    SAYLER, GS
    NELSON, JD
    JUSTICE, A
    COLWELL, RR
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1975, 30 (04) : 625 - 638
  • [35] RESPONSES OF UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY TO VARIATIONS IN DISCHARGE OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIVER
    SCHUBEL, JR
    PRITCHARD, DW
    ESTUARIES, 1986, 9 (4A): : 236 - 249
  • [36] FIELD ASSESSMENT OF BLUE CRAB RESTOCKING IN UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY
    Johnson, Eric
    Hines, Anson
    Kramer, Margaret
    Goodison, Michael
    Aguilar, Robert
    Soulen, Heather
    Roberts, Paige
    Zohar, Yonathan
    Zmora, Oded
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2009, 28 (03): : 705 - 706
  • [37] GEOCHEMICAL PROFILES OF CHESAPEAKE BAY SEDIMENTS - UPPER CRETACEOUS TO RECENT
    PYZIK, AJ
    SOMMER, SE
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1972, 53 (04): : 529 - &
  • [39] CHESAPEAKE BAY
    SANDLER, G
    HARPERS, 1966, 232 (1389): : 11 - 11
  • [40] Chesapeake Bay
    Mclane, Maureen N.
    AMERICAN SCHOLAR, 2009, 78 (04): : 51 - 51