Comparative analysis on the development potential of green hydrogen industry in China, the United States and the European Union

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Pingkuo [1 ]
Gui, Junqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Elect Power, Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai 200090, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green hydrogen; EIC-TER assessment framework; Industrial potential; Comparative analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.298
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Green hydrogen is an ideal option for decarbonizing energy systems. This article examines the status and policies of the green hydrogen industry in the world's top three energy-consuming economies. An entire industry chain-technology, economy, and roadmap assessment framework has been adopted to make a multi-dimensional discussion. The results show that: (1) China's hydrogen application potential for 2050 is 112 Mt/year (82% of which will be green hydrogen), the United States' is 93 Mt/year (similar to 100% green hydrogen), and the European Union's is 71 Mt/year (similar to 100% green hydrogen). (2) By 2030, green hydrogen is targeted to reach competitive costs in China (US$2.18/kg), the United States (US$1/kg), and the European Union (US$2.16/kg). (3) The most noticeable limitations in China, the U.S., and the EU are pipelines, raw materials for SOEC, and raw materials for PEM, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:700 / 717
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparative analysis of green certificates markets in the European Union
    Plumb, Ion
    Zamfir, Andreea-Ileana
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2009, 20 (06) : 684 - 695
  • [32] Green giants? Environmental policies of the United States and the European Union.
    Beck, Silke
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2007, 20 (03) : 283 - 289
  • [33] Multi-Omics Research Trends in Sepsis: A Bibliometric, Comparative Analysis Between the United States, the European Union 28 Member States, and China
    Evangelatos, Nikolaos
    Satyamoorthy, Kapaettu
    Levidou, Georgia
    Bauer, Pia
    Brand, Helmut
    Kouskouti, Christina
    Lehrach, Hans
    Brand, Angela
    OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 22 (03) : 190 - 197
  • [34] Regulatory approaches towards AI Medical Devices: A comparative study of the United States, the European Union and China
    Tang, Daolu
    Xi, Xuezhi
    Li, Yong
    Hu, Meiling
    HEALTH POLICY, 2025, 153
  • [35] Methodologies for calculating FRAND damages: an economic and comparative analysis of the case law from China, the European Union, India, and the United States
    Layne-Farrar A.
    Wong-Ervin K.W.
    Jindal Global Law Review, 2017, 8 (2) : 127 - 160
  • [36] EUROPEAN UNION INVESTMENT IN THE BALTIC STATES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Endriukaitiene, Janina
    Linkeviciute, Vilma
    Makutenas, Valdemaras
    Paliuliene, Lina
    MANAGEMENT THEORY AND STUDIES FOR RURAL BUSINESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 44 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [37] The Green Economy in the Energy Transformation Process-Comparative Analysis of the European Union Member States
    Wyrwa, Joanna
    Jazwinski, Ireneusz
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (20)
  • [38] Medical device regulation in the United States and the European Union: A comparative study
    Chai, JY
    FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, 2000, 55 (01) : 57 - 80
  • [39] Tax measures to reduce food losses and waste in the United States and the European Union: a comparative analysis
    Landin, Sofia Arana
    REVESCO-REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS COOPERATIVOS, 2024, (146):
  • [40] Catastrophe Risk Financing in the United States and the European Union: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Regulatory Approaches
    Klein, Robert W.
    Wang, Shaun
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE, 2009, 76 (03) : 607 - 637