On the Use of SuperDARN Ground Backscatter Measurements for Ionospheric Propagation Model Validation

被引:0
|
作者
Ruck, Joshua J. [1 ]
Themens, David R. [1 ,2 ]
Ponomarenko, Pasha [3 ]
Burrell, Angeline G. [4 ]
Kunduri, Bharat [5 ]
Ruohoniemi, J. Michael [5 ]
Elvidge, Sean [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Engn, Space Environm & Radio Engn SERENE Grp, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Phys, Fredericton, NB, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Inst Space & Atmospher Studies, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[4] US Naval Res Lab, Space Sci Div, Washington, DC USA
[5] Virginia Tech, Bradley Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Blacksburg, VA USA
关键词
SuperDARN; ionosphere; validation; backscatter; radar; model; HIGH-LATITUDES; RADAR; PARAMETERIZATION; DISTURBANCES;
D O I
10.1029/2024SW003916
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Prior to use in operational systems, it is essential to validate ionospheric models in a manner relevant to their intended application to ensure satisfactory performance. For Over-the-Horizon radars (OTHR) operating in the high-frequency (HF) band (3-30 MHz), the problem of model validation is severe when used in Coordinate Registration (CR) and Frequency Management Systems (FMS). It is imperative that the full error characteristics of models is well understood in these applications due to the critical relationship they impose on system performance. To better understand model performance in the context of OTHR, we introduce an ionospheric model validation technique using the oblique ground backscatter measurements in soundings from the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN). Analysis is performed in terms of the F-region leading edge (LE) errors and assessment of range-elevation distributions using calibrated interferometer data. This technique is demonstrated by validating the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) 2016 for January and June in both 2014 and 2018. LE RMS errors of 100-400 km and 400-800 km are observed for winter and summer months, respectively. Evening errors regularly exceeding 1,000 km across all months are identified. Ionosonde driven corrections to the IRI-2016 peak parameters provide improvements of 200-800 km to the LE, with the greatest improvements observed during the nighttime. Diagnostics of echo distributions indicate consistent underestimates in model NmF2 during the daytime hours of June 2014 due to offsets of -8 degrees being observed in modeled elevation angles at 18:00 and 21:00 UT. Models of the ionized upper atmosphere, a region known as the ionosphere, must be validated using appropriate techniques prior to their use in operational systems. This is of greatest importance for Over-the-Horizon radars (OTHR) that rely on the reflection of radio waves in the 3-30 MHz band from the ionosphere for their operation. The accuracy of OTHR is largely related to the performance of the model ionosphere used to establish target positions, and so it is essential to understand how models behave under different circumstances. We introduce a new technique for validating models using measurements from the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) of research radars. Using a dominant feature present within these radar echoes, we perform an example validation of the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) 2016 by modeling the expected path of radio waves. The performance is seen to be best during winter and typically worse in the evening. Using further information present within the measurements, we diagnose the likely cause of errors to be due to underestimates in a key model parameter. This is confirmed when we offset model parameters using direct measurements of the ionosphere and observe a significant improvement in model performance. We introduce an ionospheric model validation technique using SuperDARN ground backscatter Performance of the IRI-2016 is best during the daytime of January 2014 and 2018, whilst sporadic-E in June causes significant degradations IRI-2016 range errors are seen to be most significant near the terminator and during the nighttime
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ground dynamics model validation by use of landing flight test
    Beaulieu, M. Nadeau
    Botez, R. A.
    Hiliuta, A.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2007, 44 (06): : 2063 - 2068
  • [42] A MODEL FOR INTERPRETATION OF IONOSPHERIC DRIFTS MEASUREMENTS
    KENT, GS
    ANNALES DE GEOPHYSIQUE, 1966, 22 (03): : 427 - +
  • [43] Validation of Backscatter Measurements from the Advanced Scatterometer on MetOp-A
    Anderson, C.
    Figa, J.
    Bonekamp, H.
    Wilson, J. J. W.
    Verspeek, J.
    Stoffelen, A.
    Portabella, M.
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 29 (01) : 77 - 88
  • [44] GROUND VALIDATION OF TRMM/PR MEASUREMENTS
    Nakagawa, K.
    Hanado, H.
    Kawamura, S.
    Takahashi, N.
    Iguchi, T.
    NETWORKING THE WORLD WITH REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 38 : 154 - 157
  • [45] An Evaluation of Spire Radio Occultation Data in Assimilative Ionospheric Model GPSII and Validation by Ionosonde Measurements
    Kramer, Kelsey K.
    Fridman, Sergey V.
    Nickisch, L. J.
    RADIO SCIENCE, 2021, 56 (04)
  • [46] An evaluation of Spire radio occultation data in assimilative ionospheric model GPSII and validation by ionosonde measurements
    Kramer, Kelsey K.
    Fridman, Sergey, V
    Nickisch, L. J.
    2020 XXXIIIRD GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF RADIO SCIENCE, 2020,
  • [47] ZAM Distribution Analysis of Radiowave Ionospheric Propagation Interference Measurements
    Skeberis, Christos
    Zaharis, Zaharias D.
    Xenos, Thomas D.
    Stratakis, Dimitrios I.
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND MULTIMEDIA (TEMU), 2014, : 155 - 161
  • [48] REPORT ON SOUND PROPAGATION MEASUREMENTS OVER GROUND
    OLESON, SK
    INGARD, U
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1956, 28 (04): : 763 - 763
  • [49] A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN GROUND-BASED AND AIRBORNE RADAR BACKSCATTER MEASUREMENTS
    DELOOR, GP
    HOOGEBOOM, P
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1982, 20 (01): : 134 - 136
  • [50] Use of wind tunnel measurements for mathematical model comparison and validation
    Corti, A
    Zanobini, M
    Canepa, E
    AIR POLLUTION MODELLING AND SIMULATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 341 - 354