A CASE STUDY ON THE URBAN SKYLINES OF ISTANBUL: DIMENSIONS OF VISUAL COMPLEXITY WITH FRACTAL ANALYSIS (1)

被引:0
|
作者
Cobanli, Furkan Taha [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Inst Social Sci, Dept Geog, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Skyline; fractal dimension; box-counting method; urban morphology; Istanbul; LANDSCAPE QUALITY ASSESSMENT; ARCHITECTURE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.4305/METU.JFA.2024.1.4
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Urban skylines have a dynamic structure because they reflect changing conditions in time and space. This dynamic structure also has the potential to be an urban information tool for evaluating the visual qualities and complexities of cities. This article presents a new methodological perspective on urban skyline studies through fractal analysis in Istanbul. In the last 30 years, several computational techniques have been developed to measure the morphological characteristics of cities. Fractal analysis, the most well-known and widespread of these, is used in this study to analyze the complex structure of urban skylines obtained through visual data. The study aims to first expose the existing urban skyline of Istanbul and then assess the influence of the factors influencing this skyline on its appearance by using fractal geometry. The fractal dimension, measured by the box count is used for this purpose and that is a metric used to describe the complexity of urban skylines. In this study, in which Beyaz & imath;t Fire Tower is accepted as the reference point, the fractal dimensions of the skyline obtained from urban panoramas are calculated using the ImageJ Program and FracLac plugin. As a result of the fractal analysis of the skyline, fractal dimensions in the range of 1,0731-1,2171 were obtained. The skylines and their trends are presented through the rose diagram, and fractal analysis shows that two main elements complicate the appearance of the city the most which are: mosque and skyscrapers.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agent-Based Urban Growth Simulation A Case Study on Istanbul
    Bingol, Cemal Koray
    Colakoglu, Birgul
    [J]. ECAADE 2016: COMPLEXITY & SIMPLICITY, VOL 2, 2016, : 41 - 48
  • [22] Factors affecting the planning and management of urban forests: A case study of Istanbul
    Kose, Murat
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2020, 54
  • [23] Fractal dimensions characterizing mammal teeth: a case study involving Elephantidae
    Stone, J
    Telford, M
    [J]. MAMMAL REVIEW, 2005, 35 (01) : 123 - 128
  • [24] XERISCAPE ANALYSIS: A CASE STUDY IN A RESIDENTIAL GARDEN IN ISTANBUL
    Cinar, H. S.
    Aktas, N. Kart
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2018, 19 (04): : 1904 - 1917
  • [25] The Suleymaniye Mosque: a computational fractal analysis of visual complexity and layering in Sinan's masterwork
    Ediz, Ozgur
    Ostwald, Michael J.
    [J]. ARQ-ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2012, 16 (02) : 171 - 182
  • [26] Complexity modeling and stability analysis of urban subway network Wuhan City case study
    Liu, Youjun
    Tan, Yue
    [J]. INTELLIGENT AND INTEGRATED SUSTAINABLE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDINGS FROM THE 13TH COTA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF TRANSPORTATION PROFESSIONALS (CICTP2013), 2013, 96 : 1611 - 1621
  • [27] Study of Urban ComMunity Public Security Management in Complexity Visual Field
    Ren Guoyou
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 CHINESE SEMINAR ON THE PRINCIPLES OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, : 105 - 108
  • [28] Sustainability Understanding and Behaviors across Urban Areas: A Case Study on Istanbul City
    Topal, Hasan Fehmi
    Hunt, Dexter V. L.
    Rogers, Christopher D. F.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [29] THE IMPORTANCE OF AWARENESS IN URBAN CONSERVATION AND THE ROLE OF CHILDREN, USKUDAR IN ISTANBUL AS A CASE STUDY
    Atalay, Hilay
    Andic, Yasemin Tosun
    [J]. LESS MORE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN LANDSCAPE, 2012, (16): : 523 - 530
  • [30] Monitoring urban growth on the European side of the Istanbul metropolitan area: A case study
    Kaya, S
    Curran, PJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2006, 8 (01): : 18 - 25