Private, Public, Personal: Shifting Patterns in Geospatial Data Sources in Geographic Research

被引:0
|
作者
Appiah, Gabriel [1 ]
Kaufman, Mira [1 ]
Cooney, Billy [1 ]
Andris, Clio [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch City & Reg Planning, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch City & Reg Planning, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Interact Comp, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
big data; geospatial data sources; government data; private sector data; research funding; MODEL; INTEGRATION; GENERATION; IMPACT; GIS;
D O I
10.1080/24694452.2024.2394078
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Geospatial data sources include data collected by the public sector (i.e., government), private sector (i.e., industry), or through field work. Of these categories, the private sector, especially through tech firms, has provided new types of cutting-edge data sets that are particularly large and novel. These include data from social media platforms and location-based technologies such as Global Positioning Systems and mobile phones. Here, we explore the extent to which peer-reviewed geospatial research has adopted these data sources, perhaps in lieu of more traditional data types. We review peer-reviewed journal articles from six flagship journals in geographic information systems, geography, and urban analytics that publish research that uses spatial data analysis. We find that geospatial researchers continue to rely on government-collected data for their research, but that researchers' use of data from the private sector have increased in recent years. This finding implies that as spatial analysis studies increasingly rely on private data sets, we should revisit (1) how industry data collection faces fewer regulations on data quality and has different motivations for their collection, (2) how this affects our ability to trust our data sets, and (3) the role of government and field work in data collection and dissemination in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 57
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Sources of Public Access to Personal Data
    Alvarado Avalos, Francisco
    REVISTA CHILENA DE DERECHO Y TECNOLOGIA, 2014, 3 (02): : 205 - 226
  • [2] PATTERNS OF RESEARCH USE IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTORS
    DESHPANDE, R
    ZALTMAN, G
    KNOWLEDGE-CREATION DIFFUSION UTILIZATION, 1983, 4 (04): : 561 - 575
  • [3] Geomatics and the law: Geospatial data: Balancing private ownership and public interest
    Mills M.
    de Rijcke I.
    1600, Canadian Institute of Geomatics (70): : 145 - 149
  • [4] Exploring personal data for public good research
    Bietz, Matthew J.
    Bloss, Cinnamon
    Godino, Job
    Patrick, Kevin
    Interactions, 2015, 22 (05) : 62 - 65
  • [5] PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR SOURCES OF RESEARCH FUNDING - APPROACHES AND STRATEGIES
    MCDERMOTT, MR
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 195 : 85 - CHED
  • [6] Public commons of geographic data: Research and development challenges
    Onsrud, H
    Camara, G
    Campbell, J
    Chakravarthy, NS
    GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3234 : 223 - 238
  • [7] Allonymous science: the politics of placing and shifting credit in public-private nutrition research
    Penders, Bart
    Lutz, Peter
    Shaw, David M.
    Townend, David M. R.
    LIFE SCIENCES SOCIETY AND POLICY, 2020, 16 (01)
  • [8] Public, private and personal: Qualitative research on policymakers' opinions on smokefree interventions to protect children in 'private' spaces
    Rouch, Gareth
    Thomson, George
    Wilson, Nick
    Hudson, Sheena
    Edwards, Richard
    Gifford, Heather
    Lanumata, Tolotea
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
  • [9] Public, private and personal: Qualitative research on policymakers' opinions on smokefree interventions to protect children in 'private' spaces
    Gareth Rouch
    George Thomson
    Nick Wilson
    Sheena Hudson
    Richard Edwards
    Heather Gifford
    Tolotea Lanumata
    BMC Public Health, 10
  • [10] Research Using Blogs for Data: Public Documents or Private Musings?
    Eastham, Linda A.
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2011, 34 (04) : 353 - 361