Non-coplanar CBCT image reconstruction using a generative adversarial network for non-coplanar radiotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Wei, Ran [1 ]
Song, Zhiyue [1 ]
Pan, Ziqi [1 ]
Cao, Ying [1 ]
Song, Yongli [1 ]
Dai, Jianrong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol,Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cone-beam computed tomography; deep learning; image reconstruction; limited angle; non-coplanar radiotherapy; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; LIMITED-ANGLE; QUALITY; OPTIMIZATION; REGISTRATION; VERIFICATION; UNCERTAINTY; ACQUISITION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14487
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo develop a non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image reconstruction method using projections within a limited angle range for non-coplanar radiotherapy.MethodsA generative adversarial network (GAN) was utilized to reconstruct non-coplanar CBCT images. Data from 40 patients with brain tumors and two head phantoms were used in this study. In the training stage, the generator of the GAN used coplanar CBCT and non-coplanar projections as the input, and an encoder with a dual-branch structure was utilized to extract features from the coplanar CBCT and non-coplanar projections separately. Non-coplanar CBCT images were then reconstructed using a decoder by combining the extracted features. To improve the reconstruction accuracy of the image details, the generator was adversarially trained using a patch-based convolutional neural network as the discriminator. A newly designed joint loss was used to improve the global structure consistency rather than the conventional GAN loss. The proposed model was evaluated using data from eight patients and two phantoms at four couch angles (+/- 45 degrees, +/- 90 degrees) that are most commonly used for brain non-coplanar radiotherapy in our department. The reconstructed accuracy was evaluated by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE) and an overall registration error epsilon, computed by integrating the rigid transformation parameters.ResultsIn both patient data and phantom data studies, the qualitative and quantitative metrics results indicated that +/- 45 degrees couch angle models performed better than +/- 90 degrees couch angle models and had statistical differences. In the patient data study, the mean RMSE and epsilon values of couch angle at 45 degrees, -45 degrees, 90 degrees, and -90 degrees were 58.5 HU and 0.42 mm, 56.8 HU and 0.41 mm, 73.6 HU and 0.48 mm, and 65.3 HU and 0.46 mm, respectively. In the phantom data study, the mean RMSE and epsilon values of couch angle at 45 degrees, -45 degrees, 90 degrees, and -90 degrees were 91.2 HU and 0.46 mm, 95.0 HU and 0.45 mm, 114.6 HU and 0.58 mm, and 102.9 HU and 0.52 mm, respectively.ConclusionsThe results show that the reconstructed non-coplanar CBCT images can potentially enable intra-treatment three-dimensional position verification for non-coplanar radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Determining the Preliminary Orbit in the Non-Coplanar Case
    Kuznetsov, V. B.
    SOLAR SYSTEM RESEARCH, 2022, 56 (03) : 195 - 205
  • [32] Integral dose investigation of non-coplanar treatment beam geometries in radiotherapy
    Dan Nguyen
    Dong, Peng
    Long, Troy
    Ruan, Dan
    Low, Daniel A.
    Romeijn, Edwin
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (01)
  • [33] Angular Velocity Estimation Using Non-Coplanar Accelerometer Array
    Maynard, Michael
    Vikas, Vishesh
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (20) : 23452 - 23459
  • [34] ORBITAL TUMOR-IRRADIATION USING NON-COPLANAR BEAMS
    HARISIADIS, L
    SCHELL, MC
    WORKING, KR
    JUSTICE, T
    WESSELS, BW
    LING, CC
    RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (03) : 823 - 824
  • [35] Automated non-coplanar beam direction optimization
    de Pooter, JA
    Essers, M
    Woudstra, E
    Storchi, PJM
    Levendag, PC
    Heijmen, BJM
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S346 - S346
  • [36] Symposium overview: Toxicity of non-coplanar PCBs
    Fischer, LJ
    Seegal, RF
    Ganey, PE
    Pessah, IN
    Kodavanti, PRS
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 41 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [37] A Statistical Voxel Based Normal Organ Dose Prediction Model for Coplanar and Non-Coplanar Prostate Radiotherapy
    Tran, A.
    Yu, V.
    Nguyen, D.
    Woods, K.
    Low, D.
    Sheng, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3531 - 3532
  • [38] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cancer in the cranial base region -: CoPlanar versus non-coplanar irradiation
    Eich, HT
    Hero, B
    Micke, O
    Skripnitchenko, R
    Seegenschmiedt, MH
    Berthod, F
    Müller, RP
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2004, 180 : 12 - 12
  • [39] Linac Leakage Dose Received by Patients Treated Using Non-coplanar Radiotherapy Beams
    Kairn, Tanya
    Crowe, Scott
    Peet, Samuel
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2018, VOL 3, 2019, 68 (03): : 549 - 551
  • [40] y Improved Hippocampal Sparing by non-coplanar Techniques compared with coplanar Techniques in Radiotherapy of Gliomas Patients
    Levegruen, S.
    Garcia, A. S.
    Qamhiyeh, S.
    Khouya, A.
    Guberina, N.
    Stuschke, M.
    Poettgen, C.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2022, 198 (SUPPL 1) : S80 - S80