Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Kyu-Chong [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jin-Kyem [1 ]
Kim, Dong-Kyu [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Armed Forces Capital Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seongnam 13574, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Anam Hosp, Dept Radiol, 73 Goryeodae Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol Sci, Severance Hosp,Dept Radiol, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
gallbladder; polyps; ultrasonography; reproducibility of results; RISK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/tomography10070077
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: There is little information regarding the size measurement differences in gallbladder (GB) polyps performed by different radiologists on abdominal ultrasonography (US). Aim: To reveal the differences in GB polyp size measurements performed by different radiologists on abdominal US. Methods: From June to September 2022, the maximum diameter of 228 GB polyps was measured twice on abdominal US by one of three radiologists (a third-year radiology resident [reader A], a radiologist with 7 years of experience in abdominal US [reader B], and an abdominal radiologist with 8 years of experience in abdominal US [reader C]). Intra-reader agreements for polyp size measurements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland-Altman plot was used to visualize the differences between the first and second size measurements in each reader. Results: Reader A, reader B, and reader C evaluated 65, 77, and 86 polyps, respectively. The mean size of measured 228 GB polyps was 5.0 +/- 1.9 mm. Except for the case where reader A showed moderate intra-reader agreement (0.726) for polyps with size <= 5 mm, all readers showed an overall high intra-reader reliability (reader A, ICC = 0.859; reader B, ICC = 0.947, reader C, ICC = 0.948), indicative of good and excellent intra-reader agreements. The 95% limit of agreement of reader A, B, and C was 1.9 mm of the mean in all three readers. Conclusions: GB polyp size measurement on abdominal US showed good or excellent intra-reader agreements. However, size changes of approximately less than 1.9 mm should be interpreted carefully because these may be within the measurement error.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1041
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Three Different Emergency Ultrasonography Applications Using 3D and Biplanar Probe Technology
    Tayal, V. S.
    Weekes, A.
    Jayarama, K.
    Norton, J.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (03) : S98 - S98
  • [32] Comparison of Three Different 22-G Endobronchial Ultrasonography (EBUS) Needles in Terms of Diagnostic Yield
    Cetin, Nazli
    Ugurlu, Erhan
    Dursunoglu, Nese
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2024, 64
  • [33] Common Pathogenetic Mechanisms in Symptomatic, Uncomplicated Gallstone Disease and Functional Dyspepsia (Volume Measurement of Gallbladder and Antrum Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography)
    Trygve Hausken
    Karl Sondenaa
    Sven Svebak
    Odd Helge Gilja
    Snorri Olafsson
    Svein Odegaard
    Odd Soreide
    Arnold Berstad
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1997, 42 : 2505 - 2512
  • [34] Common pathogenetic mechanisms in symptomatic, uncomplicated gallstone disease and functional dyspepsia - Volume measurement of gallbladder and antrum using three-dimensional ultrasonography
    Hausken, T
    Sondenaa, K
    Svebak, S
    Gilja, OH
    Olafsson, S
    Odegaard, S
    Soreide, O
    Berstad, A
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1997, 42 (12) : 2505 - 2512
  • [35] A Comparison of the Abdominal and Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Size in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis and Healthy Patients at Rest and During Contraction Using Ultrasonography
    Shadani, Ailin
    Bandpei, Mohammad Ali Mohseni
    Rahmani, Nahid
    Bassampour, Seyed Alireza
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 41 (08) : 691 - 697
  • [36] In-vitro comparison of three different tracheal wall pressure measurement techniques
    Horisberger, T.
    Gerber, S.
    Bemet, V
    Schmitz, A.
    Weiss, M.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2007, 137 : 20S - 20S
  • [37] Comparison of three different methods for measurement of cervical cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis
    Zivadinov, R.
    Banas, A. C.
    Yella, V.
    Abdelrahman, N.
    Weinstock-Guttman, B.
    Dwyer, M. G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2008, 29 (02) : 319 - 325
  • [38] Transit time flow measurement: Experimental validation and comparison of three different systems
    Beldi, G
    Bosshard, A
    Hess, OM
    Althaus, U
    Walpoth, BH
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 70 (01): : 212 - 217
  • [39] Comparison of ventilation performance of three different air supply devices: a measurement study
    Larsson, U.
    Moshfegh, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VENTILATION, 2017, 16 (03) : 244 - 254
  • [40] Actigraphy in Older Adults: Comparison of Means and Variability of Three Different Aggregates of Measurement
    Rowe, Meredeth
    McCrae, Christina
    Campbell, Judy
    Horne, Claydell
    Tiegs, Tom
    Lehman, Brandy
    Cheng, Jing
    BEHAVIORAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2008, 6 (02) : 127 - 145