Age Matters

被引:1
|
作者
Mitsuhashi, Shuji [1 ]
Azari, Jade [2 ]
Dioguardi, Vincent [1 ]
Bilello, Justin [1 ]
Tang, Marshall [2 ]
Kastenberg, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Med, 833 Chestnut St,Suite 220, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Sidney Kimmel Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
adenoma detection rate; colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001953
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Goals:This study aims to address gaps in medical knowledge by determining whether adenoma detection rate (ADR) in average-risk screening patients aged 45 to 49 is equivalent to screening patients aged 50 to 54.Background:Current guidelines recommend initiating colon cancer screening at age 45, yet our understanding of the effects of ADR in average-risk individuals among 45- to 49-year-olds is still limited.Study:A retrospective analysis was conducted on records of average-risk screening colonoscopies performed on patients aged 45 to 54 from January 2018 to August 2022. Exclusions were prior diagnoses of colorectal cancer or adenomatous polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, personal or family history of genetic cancer syndromes, incomplete colonoscopy, and inadequate bowel preparation. The primary outcome was ADR in the age 45 to 49 group compared with the age 50 to 54 group.Results:Of the 3199 average-risk screening colonoscopies performed, 879 and 2116 patients were included in the age 45 to 49 and 50 to 54 groups, respectively. Both groups were predominantly female, White ethnicity, never smokers, and obese. ADR was found to be 27% in the age 45 to 49 group compared with 34% in the age 50 to 54 group (odds ratio 0.70, 90% CI: 0.60-0.83, P-value for equivalence=0.81 w/ margin 0.77 to 1.30).Conclusions:The study did not demonstrate equivalent ADR between the 2 age groups, with ADR being substantially lower in the age 45 to 49 group (27% vs. 34%). Despite this, the ADR in the 45 to 49 age range surpasses the established benchmark of 25%, supporting the decision to lower the screening age to 45 years. Ongoing national monitoring is essential to comprehensively evaluate the impact of these updated guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:896 / 901
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Age matters: The effect of job applicant age on hiring decisions
    Richardson, BA.
    Webber, LS.
    Smith, KM.
    Webb, J.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 58 : 184 - 184
  • [32] Age matters: The effect of job applicant age on hiring decisions
    Richardson, B.
    Webber, L.
    Smith, K.
    Webb, J.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 58 : 47 - 47
  • [33] Mouse Age Matters: How Age Affects the Murine Plasma Metabolome
    Pann, Patrick
    de Angelis, Martin Hrabe
    Prehn, Cornelia
    Adamski, Jerzy
    METABOLITES, 2020, 10 (11) : 1 - 14
  • [34] Age matters for girls: School entry age and female graduate education
    Zhang, Lin
    ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2022, 86
  • [35] Hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer disease: Age matters
    Smith, A. David
    van de Pol, Laura A.
    Barkhof, Frederik
    Scheltens, Philip
    van der Flier, Wiesje M.
    NEUROLOGY, 2006, 67 (04) : 728 - 728
  • [36] Aspirin for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: Age Matters
    Shureiqi, Imad
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (09) : 565 - 568
  • [37] Academic Labor in the Age of Anxiety: Autoethnography Matters
    Foster, Elissa
    CULTURAL STUDIES-CRITICAL METHODOLOGIES, 2017, 17 (04): : 320 - 326
  • [38] Being Occupied with What Matters in Advanced Age
    Clair, Valerie
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 19 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [39] Age matters: the struggle for life of a monumental tree
    Marchica, A.
    Pellegrini, E.
    Remorini, D.
    Massai, R.
    Lorenzini, G.
    Nali, C.
    Bernardi, R.
    AGROCHIMICA, 2017, 61 (02): : 110 - 122
  • [40] Vascular Risk Scores for Dementia: Age Matters
    Reijmer, Yael
    Biessels, Geert Jan
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2011, 68 (02) : 267 - 267