Biomass powder, biogas and biosolid from microalgae processing: The technical, environmental and economic performance

被引:0
|
作者
Medeiros, Diego Lima [1 ]
Tommaso, Giovana [2 ]
Moreira, ICaro Thiago Andrade [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Maranhao UFMA, Clean Technol Network TECLIM, Balsas Campus,140 Highway,Km 4, BR-65800000 Balsas, MA, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Anim Sci & Food Engn FZEA, Environm Biotechnol Lab LBA, Fernando Costa Campus,Duque Caxias Norte Ave,225 J, BR-13635900 Pirassununga, SP, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Bahia UFBA, Polytech Sch EP, Environm Engn Dept DEA, Green Blue Lab GBLAB, Prof Aristides Novis St,2 Federacao, BR-40210630 Salvador, BA, Brazil
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2024年 / 188卷
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Biotechnology; Multiproduct biorefinery; Circular bioeconomy; Energy efficiency; Environmental impact; Cost-benefit; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ENERGY; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107329
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The goal of this research was to quantify the energy demand, carbon footprint, and financial cost of microalgae biomass processing with solar drying to produce biomass powder and anaerobic digestion, which is preceded by heat treatment, to produce biogas and biosolids. Microalgae biomasses were produced from cultivation in open raceway ponds in nutrient regimes with the availability and limitation of nitrogen and phosphorus. The methods used in this study were life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA). The largest contribution in the Processing stage was from the microalgae biomass production, which accounted for 43-91 % of the indicator values in the base scenarios. The production of bioproducts from microalgae cultivation in scenarios of nutrient limitation, higher biomass productivity, electricity supply from a photovoltaic plant, and nutrient supply from on-site residual sources combined reduced up to 61 % in energy demand, 79 % in carbon footprint, and 47 % in financial cost compared to those of the base scenarios. Biomass powder is a competitive input for substituting fossil-based materials in plastic composites. Even though the biomass composition change from microalgae cultivation in nutrient limitation, methane loss reduction, and multiproduct coproduction favored the viability of anaerobic digestion in the assessed categories, the financial cost of biogas production must be reduced to increase its competitiveness compared to fossil fuels. Therefore, the proposed strategies in the evaluated scenarios should be combined to increase the eco-efficiency in an integrated microalgae biorefinery.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biogas Production from Chlorella sp TISTR 8411 Biomass Cultivated on Biogas Effluent of Seafood Processing Wastewater
    Jehlee, Aminee
    Khongkliang, Peerawat
    O-Thong, Sompong
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2017, 138 : 853 - 857
  • [42] Economic evaluation of technical, environmental and institutional barriers on biomass residue collection cost in California
    Sethi, P
    Tiangco, V
    Lee, Y
    Dee, V
    Yomogida, D
    Simons, G
    BIOMASS: A GROWTH OPPORTUNITY IN GREEN ENERGY AND VALUE-ADDED PRODUCTS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 471 - 476
  • [43] Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: Life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance
    Keoleian, GA
    Volk, TA
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2005, 24 (5-6) : 385 - 406
  • [44] Economic and environmental analysis of decentralized heating using biomass gasification gas and household biogas in rural areas
    Xia, Zongpeng
    Yang, Mengjun
    Chen, Guanyi
    Yan, Beibei
    Zhou, Weihong
    Tian, Xue
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30 (13): : 211 - 218
  • [45] Sludge Treatment Wetland for Treating Microalgae Digestate Grown in Agricultural Runoff: A Technical, Economic, and Environmental Assessment
    Gonzalez-Flo, Eva
    Ortiz, Antonio
    A. Arias, Carlos
    Diez-Montero, Ruben
    Kohlheb, Norbert
    Schauser, Ulf-Henning
    Garcia, Joan
    Gregersen, Peder K. S.
    WATER, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [46] Relative Environmental, Economic, and Energy Performance Indicators of Fuel Compositions with Biomass
    Glushkov, Dmitrii
    Nyashina, Galina
    Medvedev, Valeriy
    Vershinina, Kseniya
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [47] Assessment of environmental, economic and technical performance of geopolymer concrete: a case study
    Firdous, Rafia
    Nikravan, Morteza
    Mancke, Raoul
    Voege, Manuel
    Stephan, Dietmar
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2022, 57 (40) : 18711 - 18725
  • [48] Assessment of environmental, economic and technical performance of geopolymer concrete: a case study
    Rafia Firdous
    Morteza Nikravan
    Raoul Mancke
    Manuel Vöge
    Dietmar Stephan
    Journal of Materials Science, 2022, 57 : 18711 - 18725
  • [49] The technical or biological loop? Economic and environmental performance of circular building components
    Jansen, Bas Wouterszoon
    van Stijn, Anne
    Eberhardt, Leonora Charlotte Malabi
    van Bortel, Gerard
    Gruis, Vincent
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 34 : 476 - 489
  • [50] Study of the Potential for Energy Use of Biogas From a Wastewater Treatment Plant To a Medium-Sized City: A Technical, Economic and Environmental Analysis
    Freitas, Flavio Ferreira
    Coelho, Ulisses Raad
    Sales Silva, Sara Talita
    Lemes Gomes, Andresa Aparecida
    Barros, Regina Mambeli
    Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lucio
    Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo
    Silva dos Santos, Ivan Felipe
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2022, 13 (08) : 3509 - 3521