The impact of investment banks going public on underwriting behavior: Evidence from IPO clients' earnings management

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Jun [1 ]
Li, Ting [1 ]
Tian, Gary Gang [2 ]
Zhang, Tianshu [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Accounting & Finance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Macquarie Univ, Dept Appl Finance, Sydney, Australia
[3] Shanghai Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Accounting, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
IPO Underwriting; Earnings Management; Investment Bank; Gatekeeper; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; PRIVATE; QUALITY; FIRMS; PERFORMANCE; REPUTATION; LIQUIDITY; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107241
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the economic incentive theory, positing that listed investment banks facing significant economic pressure are likely to compromise their underwriting quality to meet client demands. Analyzing Chinese IPO firms from 2006 to 2020, we observe that those underwritten by listed investment banks demonstrate more substantial earnings management compared to those underwritten by privately held banks. This tendency is more evident in scenarios where investment banks have stronger economic incentives, weaker corporate governance, and increased performance pressure. We also find that IPO firms underwritten by listed investment banks are likelier to pass the IPO screening by the China Securities Regulatory Commission and secure higher IPO prices through pronounced earnings management. Additionally, these firms show poorer post-IPO accounting performance and stock returns. Our findings suggest that the public listing of investment banks can compromise the impartiality and quality of their services as gatekeepers in the capital market, particularly in emerging markets with limited shareholder rights protection. These results underscore the need for investors, stakeholders and regulators to be vigilant about the potential compromise to the independence of investment banks following their public listings.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Government Ownership on Investment Banks' Underwriting Performance: Evidence from China
    Jia, Ning
    Zhang, Haiyan
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2010, 39 (02) : 198 - 228
  • [2] Determinants of Underwriting Fees by New Entrant Banks: Evidence from the Japanese IPO Underwriting Market
    Koda, Keiichiro
    Yamada, Kazuo
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 47 (02) : 285 - 307
  • [3] Impact of Earnings Management on Profitability of Commercial Banks: Evidence from India
    Mangala, Deepa
    Singla, Neha
    [J]. FIIB BUSINESS REVIEW, 2022,
  • [4] The Impact of Commercial Banks on Underwriting Spreads: Evidence from Three Decades
    Kim, Dongcheol
    Palia, Darius
    Saunders, Anthony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2008, 43 (04) : 975 - 1000
  • [5] Pre-IPO earnings management: Evidence from India
    Nikbakht, Ehsan
    Sarkar, Sayan
    Smith, Garrett C.
    Spieler, Andrew C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2021, 44
  • [6] Does Investment Bankers' Prior Experience in Public Accounting Reduce Earnings Management in IPO Firms?
    He, Xianjie
    Pittman, Jeffrey
    Stein, Sarah E.
    Yin, Huifang
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2024, 43 (02): : 103 - 129
  • [7] Earnings forecast disclosure regulation and earnings management: Evidence from Taiwan IPO firms
    Jaggi B.
    Chin C.-L.
    Lin H.-W.W.
    Lee P.
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2006, 26 (3) : 275 - 299
  • [8] The Impact of Going Public on Firm-Level Employment: Evidence from IPO Listed Firms on BIST
    Usta, Ahmet
    [J]. ISTANBUL BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 50 (02): : 331 - 357
  • [9] Does going public imply short-termism in investment behavior? Evidence from China
    Yu, Zhuangxiong
    Zhang, Jie
    Li, Jie
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2020, 42
  • [10] Do investment banks create value for their clients? Empirical evidence from European acquisitions
    Kolb, Johannes
    [J]. EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (01) : 80 - 115