Recurrent cervical cancer detection using DNA methylation markers in self-collected samples from home

被引:0
|
作者
Schaafsma, Mirte [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van den Helder, Rianne [4 ,5 ]
Mom, Constantijne H. [6 ]
Steenbergen, Renske D. M. [2 ,3 ]
Bleeker, Maaike C. G. [2 ,3 ]
van Trommel, Nienke E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Antoni Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Canc Inst, Ctr Gynecol Oncol Amsterdam, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] locat Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Pathol, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Biomarkers & Imaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] locat Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Zaans Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Zaandam, Netherlands
[6] locat Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Ctr Gynecol Oncol Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam,Dept Gynecol Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
cervical cancer recurrence; DNA methylation levels; remote monitoring; self-sampling; FOLLOW-UP; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; WOMEN; SURVEILLANCE; GUIDELINES; STRATEGY; SOCIETY; UPDATE; HPV;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.35143
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Early detection of recurrent cervical cancer is important to improve survival rates. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical performance of DNA methylation markers and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervicovaginal self-samples and urine for the detection of recurrent cervical cancer. Cervical cancer patients without recurrence (n = 47) collected cervicovaginal self-samples and urine pre- and posttreatment. Additionally, 20 patients with recurrent cervical cancer collected cervicovaginal self-samples and urine at time of recurrence. All samples were self-collected at home and tested for DNA methylation and high-risk HPV DNA by PCR. In patients without recurrent cervical cancer, DNA methylation levels decreased 2-years posttreatment compared to pretreatment in cervicovaginal self-samples (p < .0001) and urine (p < .0001). DNA methylation positivity in cervicovaginal self-samples was more frequently observed in patients with recurrence (77.8%) than in patients without recurrence 2-years posttreatment (25.5%; p = .0004). Also in urine, DNA methylation positivity was more frequently observed in patients with recurrence (65%) compared to those without recurrence (35.6%; p = .038). Similarly, high-risk HPV positivity in both cervicovaginal self-samples and urine was more frequent (52.6% and 55%, respectively) in patients with recurrence compared to patients without recurrence (14.9% and 8.5%, respectively) (p = .004 and p = .0001). In conclusion, this study shows the potential of posttreatment monitoring of cervical cancer patients for recurrence by DNA methylation and high-risk HPV testing in cervicovaginal and urine samples collected at home. The highest recurrence detection rate was achieved by DNA methylation testing in cervicovaginal self-samples, detecting 77.8% of all recurrences and, specifically, 100% of the local recurrences.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Detection of human papillomavirus from self-collected vaginal samples of women in Chiang Mai, Thailand
    Wongworapat, Kanlaya
    Keawvichit, Rassamee
    Sirirojn, Bangorn
    Dokuta, Sirikwan
    Ruangyuttikarn, Cholticha
    Sriplienchan, Somchai
    Sontirat, Auchara
    Kla, Kanitta Thai
    Gravitt, Patti E.
    Celentano, David D.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2008, 35 (02) : 172 - 173
  • [42] A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF FILTER PAPER CARD FOR THE DETECTION OF HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS DNA IN SELF-COLLECTED CERVICOVAGINAL SAMPLES
    Thomas, A.
    Kannangai, R.
    Sebastian, A.
    Calvin, J. Dickson
    Thomas, V.
    Thomas, D. Susan
    Chandy, R. George
    Abraham, P.
    Peedicayil, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A319 - A319
  • [43] Discovery of DNA methylation markers in cervical cancer using relaxation ranking
    Ongenaert, Mate
    Wisman, G. Bea A.
    Volders, Haukeline H.
    Koning, Alice J.
    van der Zee, Ate G. J.
    van Criekinge, Wim
    Schuuring, Ed
    BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS, 2008, 1 (1)
  • [44] Discovery of DNA methylation markers in cervical cancer using relaxation ranking
    Maté Ongenaert
    G Bea A Wisman
    Haukeline H Volders
    Alice J Koning
    Ate GJ van der Zee
    Wim van Criekinge
    Ed Schuuring
    BMC Medical Genomics, 1
  • [45] Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing?: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Petignat, Patrick
    Faltin, Daniel L.
    Bruchim, Ilan
    Train, Martin R.
    Franco, Eduardo L.
    Coutlee, Francois
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 105 (02) : 530 - 535
  • [46] Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pretorius, Robert G.
    Belinson, Jerome L.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 107 (03) : 595 - 596
  • [47] Endometrial Cancer Detection by DNA Methylation Analysis in Cervical Papanicolaou Brush Samples
    Wang, San-feng
    Du, Chong-yang
    Li, Mi
    Wen, Bin
    Shen, Qing-jun
    Ma, Fang
    Zhang, Liang
    Deng, Hua
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2024, 23
  • [48] What will it take to obtain DNA methylation markers for early cervical cancer detection?
    Nephew, Kenneth P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (02) : 291 - 292
  • [49] Use of Self-Collected Saliva Samples for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Sogbesan, Kehinde
    Sogbesan, Taiwo
    Hata, Jane
    White, Edward L.
    Daniel, Wyeth
    Gasson, Samuel L.
    Jones, Dylan S.
    Vicari, Brittany P.
    Van Siclen, Carleen P.
    Palmucci, Carla
    Marquez, Christopher P.
    Parkulo, Mark A.
    Thielen, Kent R.
    Nassar, Aziza
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 53 (06) : 580 - 584
  • [50] Detection of DNA Methylation Markers in Urine of Cervical Cancer Patients: a feasibility study
    Rurup, R.
    van Trommel, N.
    van Splunter, A.
    Segerink, L.
    Kenter, G.
    Heideman, D.
    van Gent, M.
    Pinedo, B.
    Snijders, P.
    van den Berg, A.
    Steenbergen, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 : 170 - 170