Application value of multi-parameter magnetic resonance image-transrectal ultrasound cognitive fusion in prostate biopsy

被引:0
|
作者
Yuan, Haichuan [1 ]
Huang, Min [2 ]
Liu, Tao [3 ]
Song, Wu [1 ]
Luo, Chengpeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Renhe Hosp, Dept Urol, 1999 West Changjiang Rd, Shanghai 200431, Peoples R China
[2] Gaojing Town Community Hlth Serv Ctr, Prevent Hlth Care Sect, Shanghai 200435, Peoples R China
[3] Youyi St Community Hlth Serv Ctr, Dept Urol, Shanghai 221116, Peoples R China
来源
OPEN MEDICINE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
three-dimensional reconstruction; prostate cancer; cognitive fusion; targeted biopsy; systematic biopsy; MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI; CANCER STATISTICS; 3D RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1515/med-2024-1026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the effect of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction-assisted cognitive fusion in targeted prostate biopsy.Results There was no significant difference in the detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) between targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy, and there was significant difference in the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) between targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy. In the low prostate total specific antigen (tPSA) group, there was no statistically significant difference in the detection rate of prostate cancer between the two biopsy modalities. However, compared with systematic puncture, targeted puncture had a higher detection rate for csPCa and a lower detection rate for clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ciPCa), and the difference was statistically significant. In the high tPSA group, there was no significant difference in the detection rate of PCa, csPCa, and ciPCa between the two biopsy types. Single needle positive rate of targeted puncture (29.77%) was significantly higher than that of systematic puncture (10.28%).Conclusions The detection rate of csPCa in 3D reconstruction-assisted cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsy is better than that of 12-needle systematic biopsy, which markedly improved the positive rate of prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-A Systematic Review
    Rai, Bhavan Prasad
    Mayerhofer, Christoph
    Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Nagele, Udo
    Tokas, Theodoros
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (06): : 904 - 913
  • [32] Magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound prostate image segmentation based on improved level set for robotic prostate biopsy navigation
    Wang, Weirong
    Pan, Bo
    Yan, Jiawen
    Fu, Yili
    Liu, Yanjie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [33] Value of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy to select patients for focal therapy
    Roman Ganzer
    Alexander Mangold
    Fiona Sofia Siokou
    Christian Brinkschmidt
    Wolfgang Brummeisl
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2689 - 2694
  • [34] Value of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy to select patients for focal therapy
    Ganzer, Roman
    Mangold, Alexander
    Siokou, Fiona Sofia
    Brinkschmidt, Christian
    Brummeisl, Wolfgang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (11) : 2689 - 2694
  • [35] 3-Dimensional Elastic Registration System of Prostate Biopsy Location by Real-Time 3-Dimensional Transrectal Ultrasound Guidance With Magnetic Resonance/Transrectal Ultrasound Image Fusion
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Palmer, Suzanne
    Valencerina, Samuel
    Gross, Mitchell
    Abreu, Andre L.
    Aron, Monish
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (03): : 1080 - 1086
  • [36] Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy Significantly Upgrades Prostate Cancer Versus Systematic 12-core Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Hong Truong
    Stamatakis, Lambros
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Hoang, Anthony N.
    Walton-Diaz, Annerleim
    Shuch, Brian
    Weintraub, Michael
    Kruecker, Jochen
    Amalou, Hayet
    Turkbey, Baris
    Merino, Maria J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (05) : 713 - 719
  • [37] Prostate cancer detection rate of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy. Impact of clinical indications on biopsy outcome
    Silecchia, G.
    Selvaggio, O.
    Milillo, P.
    Tewari, A.
    Stallone, G.
    Carrieri, G.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2018, 66 (04): : 205 - 210
  • [38] Diagnostic Value of Guided Biopsies: Fusion and Cognitive-registration Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Conventional Ultrasound Biopsy of the Prostate
    Oberlin, Daniel T.
    Casalino, David D.
    Miller, Frank H.
    Matulewicz, Richard S.
    Perry, Kent T.
    Nadler, Robert B.
    Kundu, Shilajit
    Catalona, William J.
    Meeks, Joshua J.
    UROLOGY, 2016, 92 : 75 - 79
  • [39] Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Tareen, Basir
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (02): : 333 - 334
  • [40] Prostate cancer detection using magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy: A retrospective cohort study
    Pratihar, Sarbartha Kumar
    Khanna, Ashish
    Vasudeo, Vivek
    Gupta, Rahul
    Saurabh, Nikhil
    Kumar, Bhuwan
    Ali, Mujahid
    Akotkar, Shravika S.
    Rawal, Sudhir Kumar
    Singh, Amitabh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 39 (04) : 297 - 302