Functional outcomes after retrosigmoid approach to the cerebellopontine angle: Observations from a single-center experience of over 13 years

Introduction: Accessing the posterior base of the skull is complex because of the vital neurovascular structures in the area. However, the retrosigmoid approach (RSA) offers a solution to this challenge. Research question: To analyze surgical outcome of RSA. Material and methods: This study involved a retrospective review of patient charts from a single center, focusing on the surgical procedure and outcomes following the operation. Results: The study included 517 patients suffering from conditions like vestibular schwannomas (VS), metastatic cancers, and trigeminal neuralgia. The most frequent symptoms reported were balance disorders (42.7%), hearing loss (36.5%), walking difficulties (21.2%), headaches (18.9%), facial pain (17.1%), issues with trigeminal nerve function (14.1%), cerebellar dysfunction (13.5%), and facial nerve paralysis (10.2%). The rate of complications stood at 21.1%, with 11.3% of patients needing revision surgery. The median score on the ClavienDindo scale was 2, and the rate of mortality related to surgery was 1.0%. Permanent symptom improvement was seen in 72.1% of cases. Temporary new deficits occurred in 43.2% of patients, with facial nerve paralysis being the most common (14.1%). No significant correlation was found between the size of the craniotomy and the extent of tumor resection (p = 0.155), except in the case of VS (p = 0.041). Larger craniotomy sizes were associated with higher rates of complications (p = 0.016), especially CSF leaks (p = 0.006). Complications significantly affected the likelihood and number of new deficits (p < 0.001 for both), particularly postoperative bleeding (p = 0.019, p = 0.001), CSF leaks (p = 0.026, p = 0.039), and hydrocephalus (p = 0.050, p = 0.007). Conclusions: The potential for complications related to the surgical approach cannot be overlooked. The size of the tumor should not dictate larger surgical approaches due to the associated increase in postoperative complications; a tailored approach that considers the precise tumor location and pathology is crucial for optimizing postoperative outcomes.