Comprehensive evaluation of fetal renal ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Qinxiao [1 ]
Wang, Liang [2 ]
Hu, Mingzi [1 ]
Yang, Sisi [1 ]
Zhang, Wen [1 ]
Chen, Haiying [1 ]
Jiao, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325000, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Yuying Childrens Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325027, Peoples R China
关键词
Fetal growth restriction; Renal ultrasound; Diagnostic efficacy; Multi-parameter evaluation; DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HYPERTENSION; DIAGNOSIS; VELOCITY; HEALTH; VOLUME; ARTERY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36687
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to investigate variances in renal ultrasound parameters between fetuses experiencing fetal growth restriction (FGR) and those with normal intrauterine development, with the intent to offer actionable insights for clinical management. Method: Forty-five pregnant women diagnosed with FGR between 28 and 36 weeks of gestation, who underwent examination at Wenzhou People's Hospital from September 2021 to June 2023, constituted the FGR group. Concurrently, 65 pregnant women with normal intrauterine development at matching gestational weeks formed the control group. Renal ultrasound parameters, encompassing renal artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), time averaged maximum velocity (TAMX), resistive indices (S/D, PI, RI), ratios of renal volume to gestational age (RV/WEEK) and estimated fetal weight (RV/EFW), vascular indices (VI, FI, VFI), were compared between the two groups. All parameters represented the mean values of bilateral kidneys. Result: In the FGR group, fetal renal artery PSV (37.71 +/- 9.93 cm/s), EDV (6.19 +/- 1.50 cm/s), TAMX (15.10 +/- 3.83 cm/s), RV/WEEK (0.45 +/- 0.12), RV/EFW (7.53 +/- 3.24), VI (22.19 +/- 15.00), and VFI (5.53 +/- 3.63) were significantly lower compared to the control group (PSV: 47.11 +/- 11.24 cm/s, EDV: 7.13 +/- 2.00 cm/s, TAMX: 17.85 +/- 3.85 cm/s, RV/WEEK: 0.66 +/- 0.19, RV/EFW:9.20 +/- 3.17, VI: 28.67 +/- 14.72, VFI: 7.40 +/- 3.68). Conversely, fetal renal artery resistive indices (S/D: 9.09 +/- 2.58, PI: 2.71 +/- 0.56, RI: 0.92 +/- 0.04) in the FGR group were notably higher than those in the control group (S/D: 6.22 +/- 1.93, PI: 2.20 +/- 0.73, RI: 0.87 +/- 0.04), with statistical significance (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in renal FI between the FGR group (26.78 +/- 6.59) and the control group (26.89 +/- 5.82) (P > 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed higher diagnostic efficacy for RV/WEEK and RI among individual indicators, while combined parameter application yielded the highest diagnostic efficiency. Conclusion: Utilizing a comprehensive evaluation of fetal kidney ultrasound parameters with multiple indices facilitates early screening and diagnosis of FGR fetuses, thereby aiding clinical decision-making and enhancing newborn birth outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Screening for fetal growth restriction
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Magann, Everett F.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (02): : 284 - 294
  • [42] Fetal Growth Restriction in Africa
    Zhang, Jun
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (02) : 197 - 199
  • [43] Management of fetal growth restriction
    Alberry, M.
    Soothill, P.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2007, 92 (01): : F62 - F67
  • [44] Stillbirth and fetal growth restriction
    Serena, C.
    Marchetti, G.
    Rambaldi, M. P.
    Ottanelli, S.
    Di Tommaso, M.
    Avagliano, L.
    Pieralli, A.
    Mello, G.
    Mecacci, F.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (01): : 16 - 20
  • [45] Consequences of fetal growth restriction
    Newnham, J
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 10 (02) : 145 - 149
  • [46] Stillbirth and Fetal Growth Restriction
    Bukowski, Radek
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 53 (03): : 673 - 680
  • [47] Fetal growth restriction - Reply
    Magee, L
    LANCET, 2000, 355 (9212): : 1367 - 1367
  • [48] Models of fetal growth restriction
    Schröder, HJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2003, 110 : S29 - S39
  • [49] Fetal growth restriction: The etiology
    Maulik, Dev
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (02): : 228 - 235
  • [50] Placenta and fetal growth restriction
    Salafia, Carolyn M.
    Charles, Adrian K.
    Maas, Elizabeth M.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (02): : 236 - 256