Comprehensive evaluation of fetal renal ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Qinxiao [1 ]
Wang, Liang [2 ]
Hu, Mingzi [1 ]
Yang, Sisi [1 ]
Zhang, Wen [1 ]
Chen, Haiying [1 ]
Jiao, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325000, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Yuying Childrens Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325027, Peoples R China
关键词
Fetal growth restriction; Renal ultrasound; Diagnostic efficacy; Multi-parameter evaluation; DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HYPERTENSION; DIAGNOSIS; VELOCITY; HEALTH; VOLUME; ARTERY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36687
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to investigate variances in renal ultrasound parameters between fetuses experiencing fetal growth restriction (FGR) and those with normal intrauterine development, with the intent to offer actionable insights for clinical management. Method: Forty-five pregnant women diagnosed with FGR between 28 and 36 weeks of gestation, who underwent examination at Wenzhou People's Hospital from September 2021 to June 2023, constituted the FGR group. Concurrently, 65 pregnant women with normal intrauterine development at matching gestational weeks formed the control group. Renal ultrasound parameters, encompassing renal artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), time averaged maximum velocity (TAMX), resistive indices (S/D, PI, RI), ratios of renal volume to gestational age (RV/WEEK) and estimated fetal weight (RV/EFW), vascular indices (VI, FI, VFI), were compared between the two groups. All parameters represented the mean values of bilateral kidneys. Result: In the FGR group, fetal renal artery PSV (37.71 +/- 9.93 cm/s), EDV (6.19 +/- 1.50 cm/s), TAMX (15.10 +/- 3.83 cm/s), RV/WEEK (0.45 +/- 0.12), RV/EFW (7.53 +/- 3.24), VI (22.19 +/- 15.00), and VFI (5.53 +/- 3.63) were significantly lower compared to the control group (PSV: 47.11 +/- 11.24 cm/s, EDV: 7.13 +/- 2.00 cm/s, TAMX: 17.85 +/- 3.85 cm/s, RV/WEEK: 0.66 +/- 0.19, RV/EFW:9.20 +/- 3.17, VI: 28.67 +/- 14.72, VFI: 7.40 +/- 3.68). Conversely, fetal renal artery resistive indices (S/D: 9.09 +/- 2.58, PI: 2.71 +/- 0.56, RI: 0.92 +/- 0.04) in the FGR group were notably higher than those in the control group (S/D: 6.22 +/- 1.93, PI: 2.20 +/- 0.73, RI: 0.87 +/- 0.04), with statistical significance (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in renal FI between the FGR group (26.78 +/- 6.59) and the control group (26.89 +/- 5.82) (P > 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed higher diagnostic efficacy for RV/WEEK and RI among individual indicators, while combined parameter application yielded the highest diagnostic efficiency. Conclusion: Utilizing a comprehensive evaluation of fetal kidney ultrasound parameters with multiple indices facilitates early screening and diagnosis of FGR fetuses, thereby aiding clinical decision-making and enhancing newborn birth outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of single ultrasound parameters in detection of fetal growth restriction
    Niknafs, P
    Sibbald, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2001, 18 (06) : 325 - 334
  • [2] Predicting fetal growth restriction with renal volume using 3-D ultrasound: Efficacy evaluation
    Chang, Chiung-Hsin
    Tsai, Pei-Yin
    Yu, Chen-Hsiang
    Ko, Huei-Chen
    Chang, Fong-Ming
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 34 (04): : 533 - 537
  • [3] Prediction of fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age by ultrasound cardiac parameters
    Schaak, Ricarda
    Danzer, Moritz Fabian
    Steinhard, Johannes
    Schmitz, Ralf
    Koester, Helen A.
    Moellers, Mareike
    Sondern, Kathleen
    De Santis, Chiara
    Willy, Daniela
    Oelmeier, Kathrin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 300 : 142 - 149
  • [4] Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)-Fetal Evaluation and Antepartum Intervention
    Ferrazzi, Enrico
    Stampalija, Tamara
    Makarenko, Karina
    Casati, Daniela
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 2 (02): : 112 - 121
  • [5] Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)—Fetal Evaluation and Antepartum Intervention
    Enrico Ferrazzi
    Tamara Stampalija
    Karina Makarenko
    Daniela Casati
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2013, 2 (2) : 112 - 121
  • [6] The use of ultrasound to assess fetal growth in a guinea pig model of fetal growth restriction
    Swanson, A. M.
    Mehta, V.
    Ofir, K.
    Rowe, M.
    Rossi, C.
    Ginsberg, Y.
    Griffin, H.
    Barker, H.
    White, T.
    Boyd, M.
    David, A. L.
    LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2017, 51 (02) : 181 - 190
  • [7] Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters
    Marchand, Carolin
    Koeppe, Jeanette
    Koester, Helen Ann
    Oelmeier, Kathrin
    Schmitz, Ralf
    Steinhard, Johannes
    Fruscalzo, Arrigo
    Kubiak, Karol
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [8] Clinician performed ultrasound in fetal growth restriction: fetal, neonatal and pediatric aspects
    A Sehgal
    F Crispi
    M R Skilton
    W -P de Boode
    Journal of Perinatology, 2017, 37 : 1251 - 1258
  • [9] Clinician performed ultrasound in fetal growth restriction: fetal, neonatal and pediatric aspects
    Sehgal, A.
    Crispi, F.
    Skilton, M. R.
    de Boode, W-P
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2017, 37 (12) : 1251 - 1258
  • [10] Fetal Growth Restriction: A Comprehensive Review of Major Guidelines
    Giouleka, Sonia
    Tsakiridis, Ioannis
    Mamopoulos, Apostolos
    Kalogiannidis, Ioannis
    Athanasiadis, Apostolos
    Dagklis, Themistoklis
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2023, 78 (11) : 690 - 708