Probabilistic-based seismic fragility analysis of a ground-bridge structure system considering site liquefaction

被引:1
|
作者
Wan, Hua-Ping [1 ]
Peng, Zi-Xin [1 ]
Su, Lei [2 ]
Ren, Wei-Xin [3 ]
Gao, Qing-Fei [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Transportat Sci & Engn, Harbin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ground -bridge structure system; Site liquefaction; Seismic fragility analysis; Probabilistic seismic demand model; Damage exceeding probability; CHINA EARTHQUAKE; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; TYPICAL BRIDGES; MOTIONS; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; DAMAGE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118470
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Bridge structures are vulnerable to severe damage in previous earthquake events. Meanwhile, the earthquakeinduced site liquefaction can significantly affect the seismic performance of bridge structures. Seismic fragility analysis is considered as an effective approach for evaluating seismic performance of bridge structural systems exposed to seismic hazards. This study aims to assess seismic fragility of a ground-bridge structure system considering site liquefaction. Based on the probabilistic seismic demand model (PSDM) and joint probabilistic seismic demand model (JPSDM), a holistic framework for fragility analysis considering site liquefaction is proposed to derive the liquefaction fragility as well as the structural system fragility. The system fragility surfaces obtained by the proposed method can reflect the influence of site properties on the damage exceeding probability of bridge structures. The results demonstrate an increasing probability of undergoing high-level damage states for the whole system containing highly loose sand under strong earthquakes, which may provide significant basis for probabilistic-based aseismic design.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Reliability based seismic fragility analysis of bridge
    Kia, M.
    Bayat, M.
    Emadi, A.
    Kutanaei, S. Soleimani
    Ahmadi, H. R.
    COMPUTERS AND CONCRETE, 2022, 29 (01): : 59 - 67
  • [12] Seismic Fragility Analysis of Bridge System Based on Fuzzy Failure Criteria
    Ren, Leping
    He, Shuanhai
    Yuan, Haoyun
    Zhu, Zhao
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [13] Multivariate Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model for the Bridge Multidimensional Fragility Analysis
    Qi’ang Wang
    Ziyan Wu
    Shukui Liu
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22 : 3443 - 3451
  • [14] Multivariate Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model for the Bridge Multidimensional Fragility Analysis
    Wang, Qi'ang
    Wu, Ziyan
    Liu, Shukui
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (09) : 3443 - 3451
  • [15] Seismic Response Analysis of Water-Soil-Bridges System Considering Site Liquefaction
    Cai, Liang
    Gu, Yin
    Huang, Zhiyang
    Zhuo, Weidong
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITY AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ICSCSE), 2018, : 106 - 111
  • [16] Seismic response analysis of offshore bridges considering site liquefaction
    Gu, Y.
    Huang, Z. Y.
    Cai, L.
    Zhuo, W. D.
    EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 2740 - 2747
  • [17] System seismic fragility analysis methods for bridge structures
    Wu W.
    Li L.
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37 (21): : 273 - 280
  • [18] System fragility evaluation of a curved highway bridge structure considering multi-direction seismic excitations
    Rashid, Muhammad
    Nishio, Mayuko
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 26 (14) : 2672 - 2692
  • [19] Bridge seismic fragility analysis based on Nataf transformation
    Shen, Guo-Yu
    Yuan, Wan-Cheng
    Pang, Yu-Tao
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31 (06): : 93 - 100
  • [20] Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis considering nonlinear site effect
    Tsai, CCP
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 90 (01) : 66 - 72