Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Huajie [1 ]
Xing, Xiuli [2 ]
Wu, Mousong [1 ]
Ju, Weimin [1 ]
Jiang, Fei [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Int Inst Earth Syst Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Frontiers Sci Ctr Crit Earth Mat Cycling, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COVARIANCE FLUX DATA; LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY; LAND-SURFACE MODEL; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; BIOSPHERE MODEL; UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION; CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE RESPONSE; COUPLED CARBON;
D O I
10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Accurately modeling gross primary productivity (GPP) is of great importance for diagnosing terrestrial carbon-climate feedbacks. Process-based terrestrial ecosystem models are often subject to substantial uncertainties, primarily attributed to inadequately calibrated parameters. Recent research has identified carbonyl sulfide (COS) as a promising proxy of GPP due to the close linkage between leaf exchange of COS and carbon dioxide (CO2) through their shared pathway of stomatal diffusion. However, most of the current modeling approaches for COS and CO2 do not explicitly consider the vegetation structural impacts, i.e., the differences between the sunlit and shaded leaves in COS uptake. This study used ecosystem COS fluxes from seven sites to optimize GPP estimation across various ecosystems with the Biosphere-atmosphere Exchange Process Simulator (BEPS), which was further developed to simulate the canopy COS uptake under its state-of-the-art two-leaf framework. Our results demonstrated substantial improvement in GPP simulation across various ecosystems through the data assimilation of COS flux into the two-leaf model, with the ensemble mean of the root mean square error (RMSE) for simulated GPP reduced by 20.16 % to 64.12 %. Notably, we also shed light on the remarkable identifiability of key parameters within the BEPS model, including the maximum carboxylation rate of RuBisCO at 25 degrees C (Vcmax25), minimum stomatal conductance (bH2O), and leaf nitrogen content (Nleaf), despite intricate interactions among COS-related parameters. Furthermore, our global sensitivity analysis delineated both shared and disparate sensitivities of COS and GPP to model parameters and suggested the unique treatment of parameters for each site in COS and GPP modeling. In summary, our study deepened insights into the sensitivity, identifiability, and interactions of parameters related to COS and showcased the efficacy of COS in reducing uncertainty in GPP simulations.
引用
收藏
页码:3735 / 3760
页数:26
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Development of a two-leaf light use efficiency model for improving the calculation of terrestrial gross primary productivity
    He, Mingzhu
    Ju, Weimin
    Zhou, Yanlian
    Chen, Jingming
    He, Honglin
    Wang, Shaoqiang
    Wang, Huimin
    Guan, Dexin
    Yan, Junhua
    Li, Yingnian
    Hao, Yanbin
    Zhao, Fenghua
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2013, 173 : 28 - 39
  • [2] Modeling the Effects of Global and Diffuse Radiation on Terrestrial Gross Primary Productivity in China Based on a Two-Leaf Light Use Efficiency Model
    Zhou, Yanlian
    Wu, Xiaocui
    Ju, Weimin
    Zhang, Leiming
    Chen, Zhi
    He, Wei
    Liu, Yibo
    Shen, Yang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 21
  • [3] Improving MODIS Gross Primary Productivity by Bridging Big-Leaf and Two-Leaf Light Use Efficiency Models
    Ma, Yongming
    Guan, Xiaobin
    Chen, Jing Ming
    Ju, Weimin
    Huang, Wenli
    Shen, Huanfeng
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2024, 129 (05)
  • [4] A remote sensing-based two-leaf canopy conductance model: Global optimization and applications in modeling gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration of crops
    Bai, Yun
    Zhang, Jiahua
    Zhang, Sha
    Yao, Fengmei
    Magliulo, Vincenzo
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 215 : 411 - 437
  • [5] Seasonal Effect of the Vegetation Clumping Index on Gross Primary Productivity Estimated by a Two-Leaf Light Use Efficiency Model
    Li, Zhilong
    Jiao, Ziti
    Wang, Chenxia
    Yin, Siyang
    Guo, Jing
    Tong, Yidong
    Gao, Ge
    Tan, Zheyou
    Chen, Sizhe
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (23)
  • [6] Evaluation of Leaf-To-Canopy Upscaling Approaches for Simulating Canopy Carbonyl Sulfide Uptake and Gross Primary Productivity
    Chen, Bin
    Wang, Pengyuan
    Wang, Shaoqiang
    Liu, Zhenhai
    Croft, Holly
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2024, 129 (03)
  • [7] Quantifying Northern High Latitude Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Using Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS)
    Kuai, Le
    Parazoo, Nicholas C.
    Shi, Mingjie
    Miller, Charles E.
    Baker, Ian
    Bloom, Anthony A.
    Bowman, Kevin
    Lee, Meemong
    Zeng, Zhao-Cheng
    Commane, Roisin
    Montzka, Stephen A.
    Berry, Joe
    Sweeney, Colm
    Miller, John B.
    Yung, Yuk L.
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2022, 36 (09)
  • [8] Improving modeling of ecosystem gross primary productivity through re-optimizing temperature restrictions on photosynthesis
    Yang, Dong
    Xu, Xianli
    Xiao, Fengjin
    Xu, Chaohao
    Luo, Wei
    Tao, Lizhi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 788
  • [9] Modeling China's terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity with BEPS model: Parameter sensitivity analysis and model calibration
    Xing, Xiuli
    Wu, Mousong
    Zhang, Wenxin
    Ju, Weimin
    Tagesson, Torbern
    He, Wei
    Wang, Songhan
    Wang, Jun
    Hu, Lu
    Yuan, Shu
    Zhu, Tingting
    Wang, Xiaorong
    Ran, Youhua
    Li, Sien
    Wang, Chunyu
    Jiang, Fei
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2023, 343
  • [10] Performance of a two-leaf light use efficiency model for mapping gross primary productivity against remotely sensed sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence data
    Zan, Mei
    Zhou, Yanlian
    Ju, Weimin
    Zhang, Yongguang
    Zhang, Leiming
    Liu, Yibo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 613 : 977 - 989