Bimodal imaging: Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer is higher in MRI lesions visible to transrectal ultrasound

被引:0
|
作者
Falkenbach, Fabian [1 ]
Ahmad-Sterkau, Fatima [1 ]
Kachanov, Mykyta [1 ,2 ]
Beyersdorff, Dirk [3 ]
Koehler, Daniel [3 ]
Ambrosini, Francesca [1 ,4 ]
Ortner, Gernot [1 ]
Maurer, Tobias [1 ,5 ]
Graefen, Markus [1 ]
Budaeus, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Human Genet, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Nucl Med, Hamburg, Germany
[4] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Genoa, Italy
[5] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
PROSTATE | 2024年 / 84卷 / 16期
关键词
MRI; systematic biopsy; targeted biopsy; transrectal ultrasound; FUSION; VISIBILITY;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24785
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To explore the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; ISUP >= 2) in patients with a single MRI lesion that is visible or invisible on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) during biopsy. Methods: Retrospective analyses of patients who underwent targeted and systematic biopsy of the prostate for one MRI-visible lesion (PI-RADS score >= 3) between 2017 and 2022. TRUS-visibility, PI-RADS score, and clinical parameters were recorded prospectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of csPCa. Results: 277 consecutive patients with one MRI-visible lesion were identified. A correlating lesion on TRUS was present in 147/277 (53%). The median age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 68.0 years (IQR: 62.0-73.0), 7.3 ng/ml (IQR: 5.4-10.8) and 45.0 cc (IQR: 32.0-68.0), respectively. Baseline parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. CsPCa was detected in 59/130 (45%) without and in 102/147 (69%) patients with a corresponding TRUS lesion. In multivariable logistic regression analysis predicting csPCa, TRUS-visibility (OR: 2.13, CI: 1.14-4.03, p = 0.02) and PI-RADS score (PI-RADS 4: OR: 7.28, CI: 3.33-17.19; PI-RADS 5: OR: 13.39, CI: 5.27-36.83, p < 0.001) achieved independent predictor status. Conclusions: Bimodal-visible lesions more often harbored csPCa and were easier to target. TRUS-visibility of MRI lesions is an independent predictor of csPCa. Therefore, education in both modalities is essential. Despite MRI, the ultrasound should still be diligently examined.
引用
收藏
页码:1448 / 1455
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diffusion MRI Predicts Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy Results in Prostate Cancer Detection
    Chen, Yu-Jen
    Pu, Yeong-Shiau
    Chueh, Shih-Chieh
    Shun, Chia-Tung
    Chu, Woei-Chyn
    Tseng, Wen-Yih Isaac
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (02) : 356 - 363
  • [32] Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Sherrer, Rachael L.
    Glaser, Zachary A.
    Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Porter, Kristin K.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2019, 22 (02) : 331 - 336
  • [33] Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Rachael L. Sherrer
    Zachary A. Glaser
    Jennifer B. Gordetsky
    Jeffrey W. Nix
    Kristin K. Porter
    Soroush Rais-Bahrami
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2019, 22 : 331 - 336
  • [34] How to improve the reconstruction of prostate MRI imaging to transrectal ultrasound imaging?
    Bak, S.
    Lipczynski, W.
    Glazar, B.
    Dobrowolski, Z.
    Urbanik, A.
    Chrzan, R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (08) : 573 - 573
  • [35] MRI vs Transrectal Ultrasound to Estimate Prostate Volume and PSAD : Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection
    Choe, Shawn
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Lanzotti, Nicholas
    Okabe, Yudai
    Rac, Goran
    Shea, Steven M.
    Gorbonos, Alex
    Quek, Marcus L.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    Goldberg, Ari
    Gupta, Gopal N.
    UROLOGY, 2023, 171 : 172 - 178
  • [36] Micro-ultrasound for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with negative MRI
    Albers, Patrick
    Bennett, Jacob
    Evans, Moira
    Martin, Ella St.
    Wang, Betty
    Broomfield, Stacey
    Martin, Anais Medina
    Tu, Wendy
    Fung, Christopher
    Kinnaird, Adam
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2024, 18 (06): : 208 - 211
  • [37] MIDLINE PROSTATE LESIONS: FUSION BIOPSY IMPROVES DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CANCER
    Muthigi, Akhil
    George, Arvin
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Shakir, Nabeel
    Kadakia, Meet
    Kilchevsky, Amichai
    Frye, Thomas
    Su, Daniel
    Merino, Maria
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter
    Wood, Bradford
    Pinto, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E175 - E175
  • [38] CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATE OF PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM SCORE 4 IN THE PERIPHERAL ZONE
    Song, Gang
    Sun, Zhoujie
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E897 - E897
  • [39] Clinically significant prostate cancer detection with MRI-US Fusion biopsy
    Gnanappiragasam, S.
    Redmond, E. J.
    McEvoy, E.
    Conroy, T.
    Ward, E.
    McDermott, T. E. D.
    Thomas, A. J.
    Flynn, R. J.
    Lynch, T. H.
    Manecksha, R. P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 : 36 - 36
  • [40] Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: A radiomic shape features study
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Ponsiglione, Andrea
    Romeo, Valeria
    Verde, Francesco
    Creta, Massimiliano
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Longo, Nicola
    Pace, Leonardo
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 116 : 144 - 149