Bimodal imaging: Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer is higher in MRI lesions visible to transrectal ultrasound

被引:0
|
作者
Falkenbach, Fabian [1 ]
Ahmad-Sterkau, Fatima [1 ]
Kachanov, Mykyta [1 ,2 ]
Beyersdorff, Dirk [3 ]
Koehler, Daniel [3 ]
Ambrosini, Francesca [1 ,4 ]
Ortner, Gernot [1 ]
Maurer, Tobias [1 ,5 ]
Graefen, Markus [1 ]
Budaeus, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Human Genet, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Nucl Med, Hamburg, Germany
[4] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Genoa, Italy
[5] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
PROSTATE | 2024年 / 84卷 / 16期
关键词
MRI; systematic biopsy; targeted biopsy; transrectal ultrasound; FUSION; VISIBILITY;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24785
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To explore the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; ISUP >= 2) in patients with a single MRI lesion that is visible or invisible on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) during biopsy. Methods: Retrospective analyses of patients who underwent targeted and systematic biopsy of the prostate for one MRI-visible lesion (PI-RADS score >= 3) between 2017 and 2022. TRUS-visibility, PI-RADS score, and clinical parameters were recorded prospectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of csPCa. Results: 277 consecutive patients with one MRI-visible lesion were identified. A correlating lesion on TRUS was present in 147/277 (53%). The median age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 68.0 years (IQR: 62.0-73.0), 7.3 ng/ml (IQR: 5.4-10.8) and 45.0 cc (IQR: 32.0-68.0), respectively. Baseline parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. CsPCa was detected in 59/130 (45%) without and in 102/147 (69%) patients with a corresponding TRUS lesion. In multivariable logistic regression analysis predicting csPCa, TRUS-visibility (OR: 2.13, CI: 1.14-4.03, p = 0.02) and PI-RADS score (PI-RADS 4: OR: 7.28, CI: 3.33-17.19; PI-RADS 5: OR: 13.39, CI: 5.27-36.83, p < 0.001) achieved independent predictor status. Conclusions: Bimodal-visible lesions more often harbored csPCa and were easier to target. TRUS-visibility of MRI lesions is an independent predictor of csPCa. Therefore, education in both modalities is essential. Despite MRI, the ultrasound should still be diligently examined.
引用
收藏
页码:1448 / 1455
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bimodal imaging: Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer is higher in MRI lesions visible by transrectal ultrasound
    Falkenbach, F.
    Ahmad-Sterkau, F.
    Kachanov, M.
    Beyersdorff, D.
    Koehler, D.
    Ambrosini, F.
    Ortner, G.
    Maurer, T.
    Graefen, M.
    Budaus, L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1106 - S1107
  • [2] Can transrectal prostate ultrasound compete with multiparametric MRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Grey, Alistair D. R.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Tam, Joseph
    Loch, Tillmann
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1492 - 1500
  • [3] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1749 - 1754
  • [4] COMPARISON OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-FUSION BIOPSY AND STANDARD TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND BIOPSY : CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATE
    Byun, Hye Jin
    Jung, Wonho
    Ha, Ji Yong
    Kim, Byung Hoon
    Park, Chol Hee
    Kim, Chun Il
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E516 - E516
  • [5] Are Hypoechoic Lesions on Transrectal Ultrasonography a Marker for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer?
    Il Noh, Tae
    Shin, Yoon Sun
    Shim, Ji Sung
    Yoon, Jong Hyun
    Kim, Jae Heon
    Bae, Jae Hyun
    Moon, Du Geon
    Park, Jae Young
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 54 (10) : 666 - 670
  • [6] DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE-CANCER BY TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SYSTEMATIC BIOPSIES
    TERRIS, MK
    MCNEAL, JE
    STAMEY, TA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (03): : 829 - 832
  • [7] Re: Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Reply
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (06): : 1888 - 1889
  • [8] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy EDITORIAL COMMENTS
    Jones, J. Stephen
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1754 - 1754
  • [9] Diagnostic performance of targeted transrectal MRI-Ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yuwono, A.
    Tan, T. -W.
    Yeow, Y.
    Lee, C. -H.
    Tan, C. -H.
    Chong, K. -T.
    Lee, Y. -M.
    Png, K. -S.
    Tan, Y. -K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 19 - 19
  • [10] Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04) : 597 - 606