Performance comparison of structure delineation based on image registration methods in head and neck cancer patients

被引:0
|
作者
Paitoon, Komsorn [1 ,2 ]
Watcharawipha, Anirut [2 ]
Tharavichitkul, Ekkasit [2 ]
Thongsuk, Warit [2 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Med Phys Program, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Div Radiat Oncol, Chiang Mai, Thailand
关键词
Rigid image registration; deformable image registration; delineation; treatment planning; RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396924000190
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Propose: To investigate the performance of image registration methods for structure delineation in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients.Methods and materials: This retrospective study randomly recruited 22 patients who had been irradiated in the H&N region between January 2016 and February 2024. The sample group included nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. The treatment planning structures were delineated as images of computed tomography simulation (CTsim) and were set as the ground-truth. The latest CT diagnostic (CTdiag) image sets of these selected patients were imported into third-party software for delineation. The structures of CTdiag were delineated using an artificial intelligence method except for the target. The performance of rigid and deformable image registration methods (RIR and DIR, respectively) between these two image sets were evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The performance evaluation scores were also compared between NPC and OPC.Result: The DSC revealed a significant difference in all structures between RIR and DIR, whereas the HD showed no significant difference on the target and the larynx. In terms of a comparison of treatment regions, OPC appeared to sustain the greatest benefit from DIR.Conclusion: Image registration can provide the benefit of structure delineation, particularly when employing the DIR method. Although the DIR method may not offer a high degree of performance in terms of target delineation, it could effectively serve as a delineation guideline in this process.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical-based image registration for head and neck radiation treatment
    Al-Mayah, Adil
    Moseley, Joanne
    Hunter, Shannon
    Velec, Mike
    Chau, Lily
    Breen, Stephen
    Brock, Kristy
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (21): : 6491 - 6500
  • [22] Deformable image registration to assist clinical decision for radiotherapy treatment adaptation for head and neck cancer patients
    Iliadou, Vasiliki
    Economopoulos, Theodore L.
    Karaiskos, Pantelis
    Kouloulias, Vasileios
    Platoni, Kalliopi
    Matsopoulos, George K.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2021, 7 (05)
  • [23] Validation and Comparison of 3D Image Registration Approaches for Adaptive IMRT in Head-And-Neck Cancer
    Li, H.
    Thorstad, W.
    Zhu, J.
    Wu, B.
    Yang, D.
    Low, D.
    Lu, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [24] Comparison of different QA methods for deformable image registration to the known errors for prostate and head-and-neck virtual phantoms
    Obeidat, M.
    Narayanasamy, G.
    Cline, K.
    Stathakis, S.
    Pouliot, J.
    Kim, H.
    Kirby, N.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2016, 2 (06):
  • [25] Comparison of Different QA Methods for Deformable Image Registration to the Known Errors for Prostate and Head-And-Neck Virtual Phantoms
    Obeidat, M.
    Narayanasamy, G.
    Cline, K.
    Stathakis, S.
    Pouliot, J.
    Kim, H.
    Kirby, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3291 - 3291
  • [26] Adaptive RT for Head-and-Neck Cancer: The Usefulness of Deformable Image Registration
    Behrens, C. F.
    Eiland, R. B.
    Sjostrom, D.
    Maare, C.
    Paulsen, R. R.
    Samsoe, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S775 - S775
  • [27] Adaptive IMRT for head and neck cancer based on automatically generated contours using deformable image registration
    Tsuji, S. Y.
    Hwang, A.
    Weinber, V.
    Yom, S. S.
    Quivey, J. M.
    Xia, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S162 - S162
  • [28] Evaluation of deformable image registration methods for dose monitoring in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy
    Rigaud, B.
    Simon, A.
    Castelli, J.
    Gobeli, M.
    Arango, J. D. Ospina
    Cazoulat, G.
    Henry, O.
    Haigron, P.
    De Crevoisier, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S488 - S489
  • [29] Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
    Turchan, William Tyler
    Arya, Ritu
    Hight, Robert
    Al-Hallaq, Hania
    Dominello, Michael
    Joyce, Dan
    McCabe, Bradley P.
    McCall, Anne R.
    Perevalova, Eugenia
    Stepaniak, Christopher
    Yenice, Kamil
    Burmeister, Jay
    Golden, Daniel W.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (11): : 80 - 87
  • [30] Benchmarking of five commercial deformable image registration algorithms for head and neck patients
    Pukala, Jason
    Johnson, Perry B.
    Shah, Amish P.
    Langen, Katja M.
    Bova, Frank J.
    Staton, Robert J.
    Manon, Rafael R.
    Kelly, Patrick
    Meeks, Sanford L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (03): : 25 - 40