Predictive model for contralateral inguinal hernia repair within three years of primary repair: a nationwide population-based cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Hung-Yu [1 ,4 ]
Chen, Chung-Yen [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chen, Jian-Han [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Eda Canc & Eda Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Eda Hosp, Div Gen Surg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] E Da Hosp, Bariatr & Metab Int Surg Ctr, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] I Shou Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
Predictive score; Preoperative risk factors; Contralateral inguinal hernia repair; Contralateral exploration; TAPP; TEP; National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD); EXTRAPERITONEAL TEP REPAIR; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GROIN HERNIA; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11233-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Limited reports have discussed the risk factors for contralateral inguinal hernia (CIH) repair. We generated a risk factor scoring system to predict CIH within 3 years after unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Methods We extracted the admission data of patients aged >= 18 years who underwent primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair without any other operation from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients were randomly divided into 80% and 20% validation cohorts. Multivariate analysis with a logistic regression model was used to generate the scoring system, which was used in the validation group. Results Overall, 170,492 adult men were included, with a median follow-up of 87 months. The scoring system ranged from 0-5 points, composited with age (< 45 years, 0 points; 45-65 years, 2 points; 65-80 years, 3 points; > 80 years, 2 points) and two comorbidities (cirrhosis and prostate disease: 1 point each). The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.606 and 0.551 for the derivation and validation groups, respectively. The rates and adjusted odds ratios (OR) of CIH repair in the derivation group were 3.0% at 0-2 points, 5.5% (1.854, p < 0.001) at 3, 6.7% (2.279, p < 0.001) at 4, and 6.9% (2.348, p < 0.001) at 5, with similar results in the validation group [2.3% at 0-2 points, 3.8% (1.668, p < 0.001) at 3, 5.4% (2.386, p < 0.001) at 4, and 6.8% (3.033, p < 0.001) at 5]. Conclusions The CIH scoring system effectively predicted CIH repair within three years of primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Surgeons could perform laparoscopic surgery with CIH scores > 2 points which enables easier contralateral exploration and repair during the same surgery, without additional incisions, to minimize the need for future surgeries. However, further prospective validation of this scoring system is required.
引用
收藏
页码:6605 / 6613
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Incidence and risk factors of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia development up to 25 years after unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a single-centre retrospective cohort study
    Glorieux, Robin
    Van Aerde, Matthias
    Vissers, Schila
    Fieuws, Steffen
    De Groof, Pieter
    Miserez, Marc
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (02): : 846 - 856
  • [32] Incidence and risk factors of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia development up to 25 years after unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a single-centre retrospective cohort study
    Robin Glorieux
    Matthias Van Aerde
    Schila Vissers
    Steffen Fieuws
    Pieter De Groof
    Marc Miserez
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 : 1170 - 1179
  • [33] Second repair of pediatric inguinal hernia: A longitudinal cohort study
    Chen, Yi-Sheng
    Yang, Stephen Shei-Dei
    Chen, Judy Yi-Chu
    Chang, Shang-Jen
    Chen, Ke-Chi
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [34] A study of the effectiveness of the bilateral and contralateral occult inguinal hernia repair by total extraperitoneal repair with intraperitoneal examination
    Ota, Masato
    Nitta, Toshikatsu
    Kataoka, Jun
    Fujii, Kensuke
    Ishibashi, Takashi
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 15 (01) : 97 - 102
  • [35] Association between outdoor temperature and achilles tendon repair: A 14-years nationwide population-based cohort study
    Park, Kwang Hwan
    Park, Jae Han
    Yoon, Yeo Kwon
    Kwon, Jai Bum
    Kim, Jung Hwan
    Lee, Eunju
    Roh, Yunho
    Han, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Jin Woo
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [36] Chronic pain after reoperation of an inguinal hernia with Lichtenstein or laparoscopic repair following a primary Lichtenstein repair: A nationwide questionnaire study
    Oberg, Stina
    Andresen, Kristoffer
    Baker, Jason J.
    Angenete, Eva
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 219 (04): : 701 - 706
  • [37] STUDY OF PROLENE HERNIA MESH SYSTEM IN MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR
    Nandagawali, Vishal
    Bellurkar, Amit
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (36): : 6232 - 6240
  • [38] The impact of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair for inguinal hernia treatment: A retrospective cohort study
    Zhao, Yong
    Xu, Zipeng
    Wang, Tao
    Zhou, Dingxing
    Tang, Neng
    Zhang, Shuo
    Chen, Chaobo
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2023, 6 (04)
  • [39] Consenting Practice for Primary Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: 10Years on
    Ashmore, D.
    Shiwani, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 97 - 97
  • [40] High recurrence rate 12 years after primary inguinal hernia repair
    Melis, P
    van der Drift, DGF
    Sybrandy, R
    Go, PMNYH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 166 (04) : 313 - 314