The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic and transcranial direct current stimulation on memory functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Hu, Mengdie [1 ]
Nitsche, Michael A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lv, Yanxin [5 ]
Han, Hairong [6 ]
Lin, Xu [7 ]
Qi, Fengxue [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Sport Univ, Sch Sports Med & Rehabil, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Leibniz Res Ctr Working Environm & Human Factors, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Dortmund, Germany
[3] Bielefeld Univ, Univ Clin Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Univ Hosp OWL, Protestant Hosp Bethel Fdn, Bielefeld, Germany
[4] German Ctr Mental Hlth DZPG, Bochum, Germany
[5] Beijing Sport Univ, Sports Coaching Coll, Sports Exercise & Brain Sci Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Eighth Peoples Hosp Jinan, Blood Purificat Dept, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[7] Shandong Univ, Shandong Mental Hlth Ctr, Jinan, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
mild cognitive impairment; memory; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; cognitive function; non-invasive brain stimulation; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MOTOR CORTEX; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; EPISODIC MEMORY; TEMPORAL-LOBE; MODULATION; LTD;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2024.1436448
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a condition that impairs activities of daily living, and often transforms to dementia. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) show promise in improving cognitive functions in MCI patients. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the effects of rTMS and tDCS on memory functions in MCI patients. We explored eight databases from their inception to March 16, 2024. We obtained 11 studies with 406 patients with MCI. We used the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to synthesize the effect size. rTMS and tDCS significantly improved memory functions in MCI patients (SMD = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.82; p < 0.00001; I-2 = 22%). In subgroup analysis of number of stimulation sessions, both rTMS and tDCS over 10 sessions (SMD = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.50-1.17, p < 0.00001, I-2 = 0%) significantly improved the memory function in MCI patients. The subgroup analyses on different stimulation types (SMD = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.51-1.06; p < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%) and treatment persistent effects (SMD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.51-1.35, p < 0.0001, I-2 = 0%) showed that rTMS was more effective than tDCS. rTMS with a stimulation frequency of 10 Hz (SMD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.51-1.21; p < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%) and over 10 sessions (SMD = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.58-1.38; p < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%) at multiple sites (SMD = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.44-1.49; p = 0.0003; I-2 = 0%) showed a great improvement in the memory performance of patients with MCI. rTMS was more likely to appear temporary side effects (risk ratio (RR) = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.29-7.83, p = 0.01). This meta-analysis suggests that rTMS and tDCS are safe and efficient tools to improve memory functions in patients with MCI, while rTMS had a larger effect than tDCS. rTMS with a stimulation frequency of 10 Hz targeted on multiple sites over 10 sessions showed the greatest effect. We could not conclude parameters of tDCS because of insufficient data.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcranial magnetic stimulation effects on cognitive enhancement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yan, Yixin
    Tian, Minjie
    Wang, Tong
    Wang, Xixi
    Wang, Yingying
    Shi, Jingping
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [22] Cognitive Enhancement of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Ye
    Li, Yunxia
    Nie, Lu
    Zhang, Wanting
    Ke, Zijun
    Ku, Yixuan
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 9
  • [23] The role of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of cognitive impairment in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Mengting
    Bao, Guanai
    Bai, Lu
    Yu, Enyan
    SCIENCE PROGRESS, 2021, 104 (02)
  • [24] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on episodic memory
    Galli, Giulia
    Vadillo, Miguel A.
    Sirota, Miroslav
    Feurra, Matteo
    Medvedeva, Angela
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (02) : 231 - 241
  • [25] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for mania: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kishi, Taro
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Kito, Shinsuke
    Iwata, Nakao
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2023, 25 (02) : 160 - 161
  • [26] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Knijnik, Leonardo M.
    Dussan-Sarria, Jairo A.
    Rozisky, Joanna R.
    Torres, Iraci L. S.
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Caumo, Wolnei
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (03) : 294 - 304
  • [27] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognitive Function in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
    Jiang, Lijuan
    Cui, Huiru
    Zhang, Caidi
    Cao, Xinyi
    Gu, Nannan
    Zhu, Yikang
    Wang, Jijun
    Yang, Zhi
    Li, Chunbo
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 12
  • [28] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on neuropathic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Xue
    Yan, Wangwang
    Wan, Ruihan
    Lin, Yangyang
    Zhu, Xiaoxia
    Song, Ge
    Zheng, Kangyong
    Wang, Yuling
    Wang, Xueqiang
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2022, 132 : 130 - 141
  • [29] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Xiao
    Yin, Lu
    An, Yun
    Yan, Huixin
    Zhang, Tao
    Lu, Xingang
    Yan, Juntao
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2022, 59
  • [30] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Apathy in Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Padala, Prasad R.
    Padala, Kalpana P.
    Caceda, Ricardo
    Bopp, Melinda
    Dennis, Richard A.
    Mennemeier, Mark S.
    Sullivan, Dennis H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 24 (03): : S150 - S151