A systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning approaches in predicting EV charging behavior

被引:4
|
作者
Yaghoubi, Elaheh [1 ]
Yaghoubi, Elnaz [1 ,3 ]
Khamees, Ahmed [2 ]
Razmi, Darioush [1 ]
Lu, Tianguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Coll Sci & Technol, umm al Aranib, Libya
[3] Karabuk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Karabuk, Turkiye
关键词
Electric vehicle; Machine learning; Deep learning; Ensemble learning; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; GRID INTEGRATION; MODEL; LOAD; INFRASTRUCTURE; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108789
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have enabled algorithms to autonomously acquire knowledge from data, facilitating predictive and decision-making capabilities without explicit programming. This transformative potential has reshaped industries by utilizing data-driven insights. ML and DL models have found extensive application within the domain of electric vehicle (EV) charging predictions. These techniques effectively forecast EV charging behavior, considering variables such as charging station location, time of day, battery state of charge, EV owner behavioral patterns, and weather conditions. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate ML and DL applications in forecasting EV charging behavior while introducing a systematic categorization, a notable gap in current literature. A comprehensive dataset, selected from both the Web of Science and the Scopus database, sourced from Elsevier Journal, was thoughtfully chosen to cover relevant research studies for the purpose of achieving this goal. Furthermore, our research emphasizes the significance of model evaluation and explores the usefulness of commonly employed ML and DL techniques within forecasting approaches, including Short-Term Load Forecasting (STLF), Medium-Term Load Forecasting (MTLF), and Long-Term Load Forecasting (LTLF) to ensure precise predictions. Within this framework, the selected publications are classified based on methodology, research focus, objectives, publication year, geographic origin, and research outcomes. While both ML and DL techniques exhibit substantial potential in predicting EV charging behavior and mitigating challenges posed by the rising adoption of EVs, our analysis demonstrates that ensemble learning techniques surpass them in terms of predictive performance.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine Learning Approaches for EV Charging Behavior: A Review
    Shahriar, Sakib
    Al-Ali, A. R.
    Osman, Ahmed H.
    Dhou, Salam
    Nijim, Mais
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 168980 - 168993
  • [2] A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial neural network, machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning approaches in field of geotechnical engineering
    Elaheh Yaghoubi
    Elnaz Yaghoubi
    Ahmed Khamees
    Amir Hossein Vakili
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2024, 36 (21) : 12655 - 12699
  • [3] Machine learning in predicting antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, Rui
    Luo, Rui
    Tang, Shiwei
    Song, Haoxin
    Chen, Xiujuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2022, 60 (5-6)
  • [4] Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches in Predicting EV Charging Demand
    Koohfar, Sahar
    Woldemariam, Wubeshet
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [5] Predicting infectious disease for biopreparedness and response: A systematic review of machine learning and deep learning approaches
    Keshavamurthy, Ravikiran
    Dixon, Samuel
    Pazdernik, Karl T.
    Charles, Lauren E.
    [J]. ONE HEALTH, 2022, 15
  • [6] Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Olender, Robert T.
    Roy, Sandipan
    Nishtala, Prasad S.
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [7] Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Robert T. Olender
    Sandipan Roy
    Prasad S. Nishtala
    [J]. BMC Geriatrics, 23
  • [8] Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Adebayo, Oluwasemilore
    Bhuiyan, Zunira Areeba
    Ahmed, Zubair
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [9] Predicting Student Dropout based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Systematic Review
    Andrade-Giron, Daniel
    Sandivar-Rosas, Juana
    Marin-Rodriguez, William
    Ramirez, Edgar Susanibar-
    Toro-Dextre, Eliseo
    Ausejo-Sanchez, Jose
    Villarreal-Torres, Henry
    Angeles-Morales, Julio
    [J]. EAI ENDORSED TRANSACTIONS ON SCALABLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 10 (05) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Part of speech tagging: a systematic review of deep learning and machine learning approaches
    Chiche, Alebachew
    Yitagesu, Betselot
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIG DATA, 2022, 9 (01)