The evolution of patient-reported outcome measures after a first lateral ankle sprain: A prospective study

被引:1
|
作者
Michels, Frederick [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dewyn, Tim [4 ]
Bogaerts, Kris [5 ,6 ]
De Waele, Camille [1 ]
Hamers, Delphine [1 ]
机构
[1] AZ Groeninge, Orthopaed Dept, President Kennedylaan 4, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[2] GRECMIP, Minimally Invas Foot & Ankle Soc, MIFAS, Merignac, France
[3] Univ Leuven campus Kortrijk, Fac Med, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[4] AZ Groeninge, Dept Emergency & Sports Med, President Kennedylaan 4, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Crit Care, I BioStat, Leuven, Belgium
[6] UHasselt, I BioStat, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
Ankle instability; Functional score; Chronic hindfoot instability; Ankle ligament; Recovery; Lateral ligaments; Recurrent sprains; Chronic pain; Residual complaints; FUNCTIONAL TREATMENT; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CAST IMMOBILIZATION; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; FIBULAR LIGAMENT; RECENT RUPTURE; INSTABILITY; VALIDATION; INJURIES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: A lateral ankle sprain is the most common musculoskeletal injury in the physically active population. However, it is unclear how the clinical condition evolves during the period after the injury and what proportion of patients develops chronic symptoms. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the evolution of patient-reported outcome measures after a first time lateral ankle sprain. Methods: A prospective clinical study assessed the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a consecutive group of 100 patients during 1 year after a first lateral ankle sprain. The Karlsson score and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)-score was assessed at 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. The difference between the time points of all scores was analysed using the positive change over time (binomial test versus 50%) and the difference in score (signed rank test). The time to sustained excellent level was also assessed overall and in several subgroups: age, gender, degree of injury (2 or 3), avulsion fracture, use of crutches, use of cast. Differences between subgroups were assessed by a generalized log-rank test. Results: All clinical scores demonstrated an improvement up to 12 months after the sprain. The median Karlsson score (interquartile range) improved from 62 (50-80) at 6 weeks to 90 (72-100) at 3 months, to 97 (82-100) at 6 months to 100 (90-100) at 9 months, to 100 (100-100) at 1 year. The analysis of positive change over time demonstrated a significant positive change (P-value < .0005) between all time points except between 6 weeks and 12 weeks when using the FAOS quality score. The difference in score demonstrated a significant change (P-value < .01) between all time points except between 36 weeks and 48 weeks when using the FAOS pain and FAOS sports score. Age and presence of an avulsion fracture were correlated with a slower recovery and worse results. At 1 year, in total 13 patients (13%) had a worse outcome corresponding to a Karlsson score < 81 or CAIT score < 24. Conclusion: The clinical condition after a first ankle sprain demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the different time points in the first year. Twelve months after a first lateral ankle sprain 13% had a fair or poor outcome. Higher age and presence of an avulsion fracture were correlated with a slower recovery and worse results. This information is useful in clinical practice to predict further progression and inform patients. Moreover, it is valuable to improve treatment strategies. Level of evidence: Level II (prospective cohort study) (c) 2024 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 575
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Discussion: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Toe-to-Hand Transfer: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
    Sasor, Sarah E.
    Chung, Kevin C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (04) : 1133 - 1134
  • [42] STONE (STent Or NEphrostomy) study: Patient-reported outcome measures
    Schuil, H. W.
    Hendriks, N.
    Kamphuis, G. M.
    Oskam, B. C. H.
    Arends, T. J. H.
    Duijvesz, D.
    Van Der Heij, B.
    Tjiam, I.
    Scheepens, W. A.
    d'Ancona, F. C. H.
    Van Uhm, J. I. M.
    Van Roijen, J. H.
    Weltings, S.
    Van Der Meer, R. W.
    Bosmans, J. E.
    Pelger, R. C. M.
    Beerlage, H. P.
    Duijnhoven, R. G.
    Schout, B. M. A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1755 - S1756
  • [43] Quantifying the patient experience with patient-reported outcome measures
    Lapin, Brittany
    Bautista, Joceyln
    Bae, Charles
    Katzan, Irene
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 98 - 98
  • [44] Patient-reported Outcome Measures A Stethoscope for the Patient History
    Griggs, Cornelia L.
    Schneider, Jeffrey C.
    Kazis, Lewis E.
    Ryan, Colleen M.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (06) : 1066 - 1067
  • [45] Patient-reported outcome measures after salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Madsen, C. Vestergaard
    Berg, M.
    Zedan, A.
    Mortensen, B.
    Andersen, T.
    Nissen, H.
    Volmer, L.
    Svenson, M.
    Siersbaek, T.
    Fokdal, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1183 - S1185
  • [46] Patient prioritization of routine and patient-reported postoperative outcome measures: a prospective, nested cross-sectional study
    Abdellatif, Soha
    Hladkowicz, Emily
    Lalu, Manoj M.
    Boet, Sylvain
    Gagne, Sylvain
    McIsaac, Daniel I.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2022, 69 (06): : 693 - 703
  • [47] Potential use of patient-reported outcome measures after Mohs surgery
    Sivaramakrishnan, M.
    Fleming, C. J.
    Affleck, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 169 : 75 - 76
  • [48] Patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular disease
    Kornowski, Ran
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2023, 9 (02) : 119 - 127
  • [49] A theoretical framework for patient-reported outcome measures
    Leah McClimans
    Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2010, 31 : 225 - 240
  • [50] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: The Promise of PROMIS
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2016, 24 (11) : 743 - 743