Antimicrobial Sub-MIC induces Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation without affecting the bacterial count

被引:4
|
作者
Elawady, Raghda [1 ]
Aboulela, Aliaa G. [1 ]
Gaballah, Ahmed [1 ]
Ghazal, Abeer A. [1 ]
Amer, Ahmed N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Med Res Inst, Dept Microbiol, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Pharos Univ, Fac Pharm & Drug Mfg, Dept Pharmaceut Microbiol & Immunol, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Biofilm biomass; S; aureus; Subinhibitory concentration; qPCR; Spread plate technique; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA BIOFILMS; REAL-TIME PCR; INHIBITORY CONCENTRATIONS; SUBINHIBITORY CONCENTRATIONS; VIRULENCE FACTORS; GENE-EXPRESSION; ANTIBIOTICS; QUANTIFICATION; COLISTIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12879-024-09790-3
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background Biofilm formation is an essential virulence factor that creates a highly protected growth mode for Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) to survive in any hostile environment. Antibiotic sub-minimal inhibitory concentration (sub-MIC) may modulate the biofilm formation ability of bacterial pathogens, thereby affecting bacterial pathogenesis and infection outcomes. Intense antimicrobial therapy to treat biofilm-associated infections can control the pathogenic infection aggravation but cannot guarantee its complete eradication. Objective This study aimed to assess the sub-MICs effect of 5 different antimicrobial classes on biofilm-forming capacity among Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates using three different biofilm quantitation techniques. Methods In this study, the effects of 5 different antimicrobial agents, namely, azithromycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and imipenem, at sub-MICs of 12.5%, 25%, and 50% were tested on 5 different clinical isolates of S. aureus. The biofilms formed in the absence and presence of different antimicrobial sub-MICs were then assessed using the following three different techniques: the crystal violet (CV) staining method, the quantitative PCR (qPCR) method, and the spread plate method (SPM). Results Biofilm formation was significantly induced in 64% of the tested conditions using the CV technique. On the other hand, the qPCR quantifying the total bacterial count and the SPM quantifying the viable bacterial count showed significant induction only in 24% and 17.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). The difference between CV and the other techniques indicates an increase in biofilm biomass without an increase in bacterial growth. As expected, sub-MICs did not reduce the viable cell count, as shown by the SPM. The CV staining method revealed that sub-MICs of imipenem and ciprofloxacin had the highest significance rate (80%) showing an inductive effect on the biofilm development. On the other hand, doxycycline, azithromycin, and gentamicin displayed lower significance rates of 73%, 53%, and 47%, respectively. Conclusion Exposure to sub-MIC doses of antimicrobial agents induces the biofilm-forming capacity of S. aureus via increasing the total biomass without significantly affecting the bacterial growth of viable count.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cuminaldehyde inhibits biofilm formation by affecting the primary adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus
    Li, Hui
    Addo, Keren Agyekumwaa
    Yu, Yi-gang
    Xiao, Xing -long
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2023, 156 : 13 - 20
  • [22] Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Strains and Effect of Phloretin on Biofilm Formation
    Mandalari, Giuseppina
    Minuti, Aurelio
    La Camera, Erminia
    Barreca, Davide
    Romeo, Orazio
    Nostro, Antonia
    CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 80 (09)
  • [23] Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Strains and Effect of Phloretin on Biofilm Formation
    Giuseppina Mandalari
    Aurelio Minuti
    Erminia La Camera
    Davide Barreca
    Orazio Romeo
    Antonia Nostro
    Current Microbiology, 2023, 80
  • [24] The effect of nisin on the biofilm production, antimicrobial susceptibility and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Ghapanvari, Parnia
    Taheri, Mohammad
    Jalilian, Farid Aziz
    Dehbashi, Sanaz
    Dezfuli, Aram Asareh Zadegan
    Arabestani, Mohammad Reza
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [25] The effect of nisin on the biofilm production, antimicrobial susceptibility and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Parnia Ghapanvari
    Mohammad Taheri
    Farid Aziz Jalilian
    Sanaz Dehbashi
    Aram Asareh Zadegan Dezfuli
    Mohammad Reza Arabestani
    European Journal of Medical Research, 27
  • [26] Linezolid decreases Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation by affecting the IcaA and IcaB proteins
    Bi, Hongxia
    Deng, Rong
    Liu, Yanbin
    ACTA MICROBIOLOGICA ET IMMUNOLOGICA HUNGARICA, 2022, 69 (02) : 109 - 117
  • [27] Antimicrobial effect of gold nanoparticles in the formation of the Staphylococcus aureus biofilm on a polyethylene surface
    Villa-Garcia, Lorena Dafnee
    Marquez-Preciado, Raul
    Ortiz-Magdaleno, Marine
    Patron-Soberano, Olga Araceli
    alvarez-Perez, Marco Antonio
    Pozos-Guillen, Amaury
    Sanchez-Vargas, Luis Octavio
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 52 (02) : 619 - 625
  • [28] Antimicrobial effect of gold nanoparticles in the formation of the Staphylococcus aureus biofilm on a polyethylene surface
    Lorena Dafnee Villa-García
    Raúl Márquez-Preciado
    Marine Ortiz-Magdaleno
    Olga Araceli Patrón-Soberano
    Marco Antonio Álvarez-Pérez
    Amaury Pozos-Guillén
    Luis Octavio Sánchez-Vargas
    Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2021, 52 : 619 - 625
  • [29] Antimicrobial Resistance and Biofilm Formation by Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Ocular Infections
    Klos, Marta
    Pomorska-Wesolowska, Monika
    Romaniszyn, Dorota
    Chmielarczyk, Agnieszka
    Wojkowska-Mach, Jadwiga
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 : S121 - S122
  • [30] Antimicrobial Activity of Punicalagin Against Staphylococcus aureus and Its Effect on Biofilm Formation
    Xu, Yunfeng
    Shi, Chao
    Wu, Qian
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Liu, Peifeng
    Li, Guanghui
    Peng, Xiaoli
    Xia, Xiaodong
    FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2017, 14 (05) : 282 - 287