Passenger valuation of interchanges in urban public transport

被引:0
|
作者
Yap, Menno [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Howard [1 ,3 ]
Cats, Oded [2 ]
机构
[1] Transport London, London, England
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Transport & Planning, Delft, Netherlands
[3] UCL, Ctr Adv Spatial Anal, London, England
关键词
Interchange; Public transport; Revealed preference; Smart card data; Transfer; Valuation; ROUTE CHOICE MODELS; TRANSFERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubtr.2024.100089
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Understanding how passengers perceive public transport interchanges is important to better explain current public transport mode and route choice behaviour and to better predict future demand levels. In this study we derive how passengers value a public transport interchange in a metropolitan context entirely based on recent, large-scale, Revealed Preference data, explicitly distinguishing between different types and modes of public transport interchanges. For this purpose we estimate three discrete choice models using maximum likelihood estimation, based on over 26,000 passenger route choices observed in June 2023 in the Greater London Area. We find that each public transport interchange is on average valued equivalent to 5 min uncrowded in-vehicle time. Additionally, our model results provide quantitative evidence that cross-platform interchanges between two metro journey legs are valued 20-25 % less negatively than a regular metro interchange where a level change is required. Multimodal bus-metro interchanges and out-of-station interchanges are perceived most negatively by passengers. Passengers value bus-bus interchanges on average about 60 % more negatively than metro-metro interchanges, possibly driven by factors such as comfort, service frequency, reliability and (perceived) safety. Our study results can be used for business case and appraisal purposes, when quantifying the impact of service changes which affect the number or type of interchanges.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of railways for urban passenger transport
    Abramovic, B.
    Petrovic, M.
    Zavada, J. Blaskovic
    [J]. URBAN TRANSPORT XIV: URBAN TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2008, 101 : 243 - 251
  • [22] TRANSPORT INTERCHANGES
    TAKAMATSU, S
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, 1994, (109) : 32 - 32
  • [23] URBAN PASSENGER TRANSPORT - SOME REALITIES
    DICKSON, LR
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN MECHANICAL ENGINEER, 1980, 30 (08): : 289 - 294
  • [24] Evaluation of urban passenger transport structure
    Zhang, SR
    Zhou, W
    Shao, C
    [J]. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol 5, 2005, 5 : 441 - 449
  • [25] A Study on the Use of Autonomous Vehicles for the Interconnection of Urban Transport Interchanges
    Georganti, Anastasia
    Soumpasis, Nikolaos
    Adamos, Giannis
    [J]. SMART ENERGY FOR SMART TRANSPORT, CSUM2022, 2023, : 621 - 621
  • [26] City-Hubs: Sustainable and Efficient Urban Transport Interchanges
    Chen, Chia-Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 65 : 200 - 201
  • [27] Role of railway traffic in public urban and suburban passenger transport (example of the City of Zagreb)
    Baric, D.
    Badanjak, D.
    Novacko, L.
    [J]. URBAN TRANSPORT XIV: URBAN TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2008, 101 : 37 - 46
  • [28] PASSENGER REQUIREMENTS AND ERGONOMICS IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT
    KOGI, K
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1979, 22 (06) : 631 - 639
  • [29] Developing an urban public passenger transport route network with account for natural resource limitations
    Yakimov, Mikhail
    Trofimenko, Yuri
    [J]. SYSTEM AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENSURING TRAFFIC SAFETY, 2018, 36 : 801 - 809
  • [30] A Level-of-Service concept regarding intermodal hubs of urban public passenger transport
    Kopylova, Tatiana
    Mikhailov, Alexander
    Shesterov, Evgenii
    [J]. SYSTEM AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENSURING TRAFFIC SAFETY, 2018, 36 : 303 - 307