Evaluating Open Source IoT Platforms: A GitHub Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Turki, Mahdi [1 ]
El Boussaidi, Ghizlane [1 ]
Benzarti, Imen [1 ]
Mili, Hafedh [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Technol Super, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Iot Platforms; Open Source; GitHub; Evaluation;
D O I
10.1145/3643794.3648348
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Internet of Things (IoT) platforms have emerged as key enablers for connected device deployment, providing core infrastructure capabilities that can be customized and extended. As IoT adoption continues accelerating across domains, understanding the landscape of mature open source platforms is important for guiding technology selection and evolution. Several studies have compared open source and proprietary IoT platforms in terms of different capabilities. However, there has been limited research specifically targeting leading open source IoT platforms that are hosted on developer communities like GitHub. In this paper, we compare the most popular open source IoT platforms on GitHub in terms of activity metrics and popularity indicators. We also identify the main features and technical capabilities implemented across the top five starred open source IoT platforms on GitHub based on a systematic review of their documentation. Our results show that: 1) Open source IoT platforms on GitHub exhibit diverse technical capabilities, yet share core features focused on device management and data visualization, 2) ThingBoard platform emerges as a leader of the open-source IoT platforms not only in terms of popularity metrics and popularity indicators, but also in terms of a broad range of features and technical capabilities, 3) Platforms specialised in industrial IoT, such as Industial-IoT and United manufacturing hub, display the best health scores and ratios of open and closed issues, and 4) OpenRemote platform capabilities are rich but focused on the support and management of smart environments.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:14 / 21
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Software effort estimation based on open source projects: Case study of Github
    Qi, Fumin
    Jing, Xiao-Yuan
    Zhu, Xiaoke
    Xie, Xiaoyuan
    Xu, Baowen
    Ying, Shi
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 92 : 145 - 157
  • [42] Analyzing Developer Use of ChatGPT Generated Code in Open Source GitHub Projects
    Grewal, Balreet
    Lu, Wentao
    Nadi, Sarah
    Bezemer, Cor-Paul
    2024 IEEE/ACM 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MINING SOFTWARE REPOSITORIES, MSR, 2024, : 157 - 161
  • [43] Open{WSN| Mote}: Open-Source Industrial IoT
    Watteyne, Thomas
    Vilajosana, Xavier
    Tuset, Pere
    ERCIM NEWS, 2015, (101): : 11 - 12
  • [44] Open-Source Federated Learning Frameworks for IoT: A Comparative Review and Analysis
    Kholod, Ivan
    Yanaki, Evgeny
    Fomichev, Dmitry
    Shalugin, Evgeniy
    Novikova, Evgenia
    Filippov, Evgeny
    Nordlund, Mats
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [45] An Open Source IoT Framework for Environmental Sensing
    Sudantha, B. H.
    Premakumara, Nilantha
    Manchanayaka, M. A. L. S. K.
    Premachandra, Chinthaka
    Sumathipala, Sagara
    Kawanaka, Hiroharu
    2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING AND ROBOTICS (ICIPROB 2020, 2020,
  • [46] An Open-source Testbed for IoT Systems
    Ciuffoletti, Augusto
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (WEBIST), 2021, : 397 - 403
  • [47] IoT Manager: An open-source IoT framework for smart cities
    Calderoni, Luca
    Magnani, Antonio
    Maio, Dario
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE, 2019, 98 : 413 - 423
  • [48] Evaluating IoT Platforms Using Integrated Probabilistic Linguistic MCDM Method
    Lin, Mingwei
    Huang, Chao
    Xu, Zeshui
    Chen, Riqing
    IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2020, 7 (11): : 11195 - 11208
  • [49] Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software
    Spinellis, Diomidis
    Gousios, Georgios
    Karakoidas, Vassilios
    Louridas, Panagiotis
    Adams, Paul J.
    Samoladas, Ioannis
    Stamelos, Ioannis
    ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2009, 233 (0C) : 5 - 28
  • [50] Evaluating open source GIS for libraries
    Donnelly, Francis P.
    LIBRARY HI TECH, 2010, 28 (01) : 131 - 151