3D-printed indium oxide monoliths for PFAS removal

被引:1
|
作者
Martins, Alysson Stefan [1 ]
Zoumpouli, Garyfalia A. [1 ]
Yi, Shan [2 ]
Exposito, Antonio Jose [1 ]
Wenk, Jannis [1 ]
Mattia, Davide [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Chem Engn, Bath BA2 7AY, England
[2] Univ Auckland, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
3D printing; Adsorption; PFAS; PFOA; Self-supported structure; PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID PFOA; PHOTOCATALYTIC DECOMPOSITION; PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES; DEGRADATION; WATER; TECHNOLOGIES; ADSORPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2024.154366
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
More efficient removal methods for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), anthropogenic compounds with high persistence in the environment, are urgently needed due to their significant adverse health effects. Current technologies for PFAS removal in water are limited by incomplete degradation or practical concerns about the use of slurry-based adsorbents. In this study, self-supported indium oxide (In2O3) monoliths were produced via extrusion-based 3D printing and used for the removal of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) via adsorption in a recirculating flow system. A detailed study of the sintering temperature, monolith geometry, and flow rate allowed maximising PFOA adsorption due to the improvement of PFOA diffusion and the increased number of active sites on the monolith, resulting in 53 % of PFOA removal with fast adsorption kinetics in 3 h. Additionally, a low-temperature pyrolysis process at 500 degrees C effectively regenerated the In2O3 monoliths, allowing reusing the monoliths for three adsorption cycles, while also improving the PFOA removal to 75 % in 3 h. The regenerated In2O3 monoliths not only have a high adsorption capacity (0.16 mg g- 1), but also required a much shorter time to reach the adsorption equilibrium compared with other adsorbents reported in the literature. The effectiveness, robustness and reusability of the 3D printed In2O3 monoliths highlight their potential as an efficient and sustainable adsorbent for PFAS removal. The approach presented here represents an effective strategy for the fabrication of complex adsorbents, which are reusable and can be easily handled, eliminating the expensive downstream removal required for slurries while offering a clear route for scale-up towards industrial use.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D-printed coolersThermoelectrics
    Yan Huang
    Nature Electronics, 2025, 8 (4) : 290 - 290
  • [22] 3D-printed minimalists
    Gross, Heinz
    Gross, Sebastian
    Nobrega, Miguel J.
    Vidal, Joao P.O.
    Kunststoffe International, 2019, 109 (1-2): : 40 - 43
  • [23] A 3D-Printed Computer
    Shirmohammadli, Vahideh
    Bahreyni, Behraad
    ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2023, 5 (08)
  • [24] 3D-Printed Microfluidics
    Au, Anthony K.
    Huynh, Wilson
    Horowitz, Lisa F.
    Folch, Albert
    ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2016, 55 (12) : 3862 - 3881
  • [25] 3D-printed microboat
    不详
    NATURE, 2020, 587 (7835) : 527 - 527
  • [26] 3D-printed ceramics
    Button, Keith (buttonkeith@gmail.com), 1600, AIAA International (58):
  • [27] 3D-PRINTED THERMOPLASTICS
    不详
    ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 2021, 179 (04): : 9 - 9
  • [28] Cu/ZSM5-Geopolymer 3D-Printed Monoliths for the NH3-SCR of NOx
    Cepollaro, Elisabetta Maria
    Botti, Renata
    Franchin, Giorgia
    Lisi, Luciana
    Colombo, Paolo
    Cimino, Stefano
    CATALYSTS, 2021, 11 (10)
  • [29] Thermomechanical properties of stereolithographic 3D-printed zinc oxide nanocomposites
    Garcia, Vincent Joseph
    Cheng, Xiang
    Rong, Lihan
    Lara-Ceniceros, Tania E.
    Ricohermoso, Emmanuel
    Bonilla-Cruz, Jose
    Espiritu, Richard D.
    Advincula, Rigoberto C.
    MRS COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 14 (04) : 676 - 685
  • [30] Formulation of Aminosilica Adsorbents into 3D-Printed Monoliths and Evaluation of Their CO2 Capture Performance
    Thakkar, Harshul
    Eastman, Stephen
    Al-Mamoori, Ahmed
    Hajari, Amit
    Rownaghi, Ali A.
    Rezaei, Fateme
    ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2017, 9 (08) : 7489 - 7498