Comparison of degree of conversion performance of bulk-fill resin composites: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies

被引:0
|
作者
Hatipoglu, Omer [1 ]
Par, Matej [2 ]
Hatipoglu, Fatma Pertek [3 ]
机构
[1] Nigde Omer Halisdemir Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Nigde, Turkiye
[2] Univ Zagreb, Sch Dent Med, Dept Endodont & Restorat Dent, Gunduliceva 5, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Nigde Omer Halisdemir Univ, Dept Endodont, Nigde, Turkiye
关键词
Bulk-fill resin composites; Degree of conversion; In vitro; Network meta-analysis; Systematic review; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; MICROMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; POLYMERIZATION KINETICS; LAYER THICKNESS; LIGHT-INTENSITY; SHRINKAGE; MICROHARDNESS; TEMPERATURE; STRENGTH; ELUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105289
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To systematically compile data on the degree of conversion (DC) for bulk-fill composites using a network meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search for in vitro studies of DC of bulk-fill composites was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Open Grey. Risk of bias within studies and due to missing evidence was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoring system and ROB-MEN tool, respectively. The primary outcome was the DC of bulk-fill composites. Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank relative performance. Inconsistencies in the model were investigated to ensure its validity and the level of confidence in the network meta-analysis (CINeMA) was assessed. Results: A total of 28 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The average DC values (%) for 0-h/top, 0h/bottom, 24-h/top, and 24-h/bottom were 59.09, 57.14, 66.73, and 63.87, respectively. According to their SUCRA ranking, the best-performing composites were: SonicFill, Venus Bulk Fill, and SDR (0-h/top), Reveal HD, i-Flow Bulk Fill, and Venus Bulk- Fill (0-h/bottom), Venus Bulk Fill, SDR, and QuiXfil (24-h/top), and Venus Bulk Fill, Aura Bulk Fill, and i-Flow Bulk Fill (24-h/bottom). Incoherence between direct and indirect evidence was identified as the most significant factor affecting confidence. Conclusions: DC values of bulk-fill composites were within the range commonly reported for previous generations of "conventional" composites, with flowable composites tending to perform better than sculptable composites. High variability in DC data was observed, which may be attributed to incompletely understood methodological differences. Clinical significance: DC is a fundamental parameter that influences multiple mechanical and biological properties of resin composites and is particularly relevant for the group of bulk-fill composites that are designed for use in thick layers.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dental Bulk-Fill Resin Composites Polymerization Efficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ajaj, Reem A.
    Farsi, Nada J.
    Alzain, Lama
    Nuwaylati, Nour
    Ghurab, Raneem
    Nassar, Hani M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES SCIENCE, 2021, 5 (06):
  • [2] Degree of Conversion and Polymerization Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites
    Yu, P.
    Yap, A. U. J.
    Wang, X. Y.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 42 (01) : 82 - 89
  • [3] Degree of conversion and polymerization shrinkage of low shrinkage bulk-fill resin composites
    Salem, Haidy N.
    Hefnawy, Sherif M.
    Nagi, Shaymaa M.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 10 (03) : 465 - 470
  • [4] Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mamede Veloso, Sirley Raiane
    Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido
    Dantas de Moraes, Sandra Lucia
    do Egito Vasconcelos, Belmiro Cavalcanti
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (01) : 221 - 233
  • [5] Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sirley Raiane Mamede Veloso
    Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos
    Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes
    Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos
    Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
    Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019, 23 : 221 - 233
  • [6] Clinical Effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin Composite Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Isac Arbildo-Vega, Heber
    Lapinska, Barbara
    Panda, Saurav
    Lamas-Lara, Cesar
    Khan, Abdul Samad
    Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [7] Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis
    Frank Engelhardt
    Sebastian Hahnel
    Verena Preis
    Martin Rosentritt
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2016, 20 : 2123 - 2130
  • [8] Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis
    Engelhardt, Frank
    Hahnel, Sebastian
    Preis, Verena
    Rosentritt, Martin
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (08) : 2123 - 2130
  • [9] Do bulk-fill resins decrease the restorative time in posterior teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies
    Bellinaso, Mariana D.
    Soares, Fabio Z. M.
    Rocha, Rachel de Olivera
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 10 (04) : e12463
  • [10] Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin -a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cidreira Boaro, Leticia Cristina
    Lopes, Diana Pereira
    Caetano de Souza, Andreia Santos
    Nakano, Ellea Lie
    Ayala Perez, Mirko Dennys
    Pfeifer, Carmem Silvia
    Goncalves, Flavia
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2019, 35 (10) : E249 - E264